Guantánamo Pilgrimage

Since the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, a particular narrative has dominated the American consciousness. It goes like this: Terrorists are unconditionally committed to a religious ideology that requires them to kill “infidels” without any regard for their own lives or any effort toward reconciliation; therefore, there is but one realistic option for the United States as it relates to such persons: permanent incapacitation through killing or detention. This narrative seeks to rationalize a perpetual war against terrorism and keeps places like Guantánamo and the detention facility at Bagram Air Base open. I reject it, however, and its conclusion that the United States must continue its war and detention policies.

Rejecting the legitimacy of such an outlook, I pray for the grace to live the Christian alternative faithfully: love of one’s enemies. Jesus commanded his followers to “do good to those who hate you, bless those who curse you, pray for those who mistreat you” (Lk 6:43-44). He did not instruct them to kill their enemies or detain them indefinitely. Since each enemy is a human being, there is always hope for relationship and dialogue, redemption and transformation.


Since 2002 the United States has detained about 800 men at Guantánamo and about 3,000 men and women at the Bagram base. The U.S. government has reported to the United Nations that about 100 of these detainees have been juveniles as young as 13 years of age.

Concerning these detentions, the Bush and Obama administrations have made substantially the same claim: Since the nation is fighting a war, the law allows the executive to indefinitely detain those declared to be “an unlawful enemy combatant” without ever charging them with a crime or giving them due process in a court of law. As long as military authorities determine that a person either constitutes a threat to national security or possesses valuable intelligence about terrorist activities, detention may continue indefinitely.

In large part, U.S. courts have accepted the argument that in wartime it is legal for the executive to use indefinite detention. Guantánamo and Bagram remain open for business. While the number of people held has been reduced in the last year-and-a-half, currently almost 1,000 men are detained in these two facilities.

The Bush and Obama administrations have also claimed that there should be no independent judicial oversight of these detentions, that in wartime military authorities, not the courts, determine whether a person has been accurately classified as an enemy combatant. But at least in regard to those detained in Guantá-namo, the U.S. Supreme Court has rejected that claim.

In a historic case, Boumediene v. Bush (2008), the court ruled that Guantánamo detainees possess a constitutional right to have their detentions reviewed in U.S. federal courts.

The Obama administration has opposed extending habeas corpus to Bagram detainees, however, even when detainees were initially captured outside Afghanistan and later transferred to an “active theater of war.” In April 2009 a U.S. district judge rejected the administration’s argument, but in May 2010 a federal appeals court overturned the district court ruling. Now it is up to the U.S. Supreme Court to decide whether to hear the case.

The Guantánamo Detainees

According to the prevailing U.S. view of who the enemy is, permanent incapacitation through killing or detention appears a plausible or even necessary response. If the enemy is irredeemably evil, he or she cannot and will not change. If the United States sets them free, they will inevitably “return to the battlefield” to kill more Americans.

Civilian leaders have continually reinforced this narrative. Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld and Vice President Dick Cheney repeatedly characterized the detainees as the “worst of the worst” terrorists in the world, captured on the battlefield fighting U.S. soldiers. The available evidence does not support these accusations.

Since 2008, when federal courts finally began to review detentions at Guantánamo, judges have concluded that in 36 of 50 cases the executive branch failed to provide sufficient evidence to support its claim that the detainee in question is an “enemy combatant” who can be lawfully detained for an indefinite amount of time. In nearly 75 percent of cases, the courts ruled the detention unlawful and ordered the detainee released.

In May, President Obama’s Guantánamo Review Task Force finally released its review of detainee cases and recommendations for disposition. The report admits that only 10 percent of the 240 detainees (when Obama came into office) had a “direct role in plotting, executing, or facilitating” terrorist acts. A majority of the detainees, the task force reports, were “low-level foreign fighters” who “lacked a significant leadership or other specialized role” in a terrorist organization. (Note: these classifications reflect the task force’s own investigation, not the assessment of an independent court that has objectively scrutinized the available evidence in each case.)

Not only have the Guantánamo detainees been wrongly characterized as the “worst of the worst” terrorists in the world, but they have been consistently dehumanized by Rush Limbaugh and others who have called them “human debris” and “bottom-of- the-barrel dregs.” Whatever the accusations against the Guantánamo detainees, however, they retain their inherent dignity and basic rights as human beings. These men are fathers, sons, uncles and brothers.

Living the Gospel

As I learn more about the Guantánamo detainees, I have experienced a deep desire to enter into relationship with them. These days I am less interested in collecting information from legal briefs and newspaper articles. Instead, I want to meet these men, shake their hands, engage in dialogue and imagine a new way forward. I want to be a brother to them. I want to be a faithful companion of Jesus, who invited his followers to love their enemies. I want to sit down with Guantánamo detainees and learn their stories, to ask: Where did you grow up? What did you do as a child? What did you dream of? What formed you and shaped you as an adolescent? What is important to you now? What are your values?

If the person is one of the few Guantánamo detainees who is a committed member of Al Qaeda, I want to hear his reasons for joining the terrorist organization. I want to ask: “What motivates you? What are your grievances against us?” I want to learn what has compelled him to resort to violence.

He might ask similar questions of me: “Why does the United States wage war against Muslims? Why invest $800 billion in soldiers and weapons each year? Why resort to violence in an attempt to solve the world’s problems?”

Such a relationship might seem far-fetched were it not for the prophetic witness of communities and individuals who have creatively incarnated Jesus’ love for enemies. Here are three:

• The Witness Against Torture community, founded by Catholic Workers and friends, made a pilgrimage to Guantánamo in 2005 to perform a corporal work of mercy: visiting the imprisoned (Mt 25:36). Even though the pilgrims were stopped at a military checkpoint outside the U.S. Naval Base and prohibited from going any farther, they were able to hold a 24-hour fast and vigil near the barbed-wire fence as an act of solidarity with the prisoners, who were informed that the vigil was taking place.

• Marc Falkoff, a professor of law at Northern Illinois University and an attorney for 17 Guantánamo prisoners, edited Poems From Guantánamo: the Detainees Speak (Univ. Iowa Press, 2007). The collection presents the voices of detainees, who share their experiences of darkness and light, despair and hope.

• Brandon Neely, a former guard at Guantánamo, traveled to London in December 2009 to meet with two former Guantánamo detainees. During the meeting, he expressed regret and sorrow for his complicity in their suffering.

Prophetic acts entail risk. Will it be possible to build trust between so-called enemies? Will Americans who seek reconciliation be labeled “terrorist sympathizers”?

I think Jesus would understand such a loss of good repute. For touching lepers and talking with Samaritans, Jesus was declared unclean. For dining with sinners, Jesus was called a glutton and a drunkard. Jesus took this risk and entered into these relationships because he believed that redemption is possible for all people. In doing so, Jesus provides a counter-narrative to the dominant belief that perpetual war and indefinite detention are the regrettable, yet inevitable responses to alleged terrorism. He showed us another way, the way of love.

Listen to an interview with Luke Hansen, S.J.

Comments are automatically closed two weeks after an article's initial publication. See our comments policy for more.
Ruth Burr
8 years 9 months ago

I would suggest  before Luke Hansen starts  his "relationship " with Guantanamo detainees , he sit down and have a heart to heart with the Salah Sultan who has joyfully proclaimed on  TV in the Islamic world , that  they will soon , very soon  bring death and destruction to the US . It is unforgiveable that the U.S. befriends Israel
and as a result of this friendship we DESERVE destruction.
This is common rhethoric  in the Islamic world.
There was ,also, the dear nurse at Guantanamo  ,who  daily treated a detainee for his injuries from the battle field , only to have her head grabbed and her face smashed into the wall on her way out of his room on her final visit. Sorry , I cannot remember the name of the Colonel who wrote the book, but , would ,also, advise Luke Hansen to read 'Inside Guantanamo'. It is very enlightening.
I DO believe in turning the other cheek  and being my brothers keeper, HOWEVER , this is to be done with eyes wide open and not crawling in with ,"Mea Culpa, Mea Culpa."

Christopher Myers
8 years 9 months ago
I agree with Ruth Burr.  Luke, please do not be so naive.  I am will adversed into Islam and its ideology.  I have traveled around the world.  I have read much and seen much.  I have been exposed much through Muslim eyes in Chicago and around the world.  I would suggest you have a good sit down talk with Robert Spencer and David Horowitz.  

What you perceive and experience with these men in prison is through your heart but you do not understand indoctrination which they will may revert back to immediately because of the brainwashing and culture they know as 'home' base.  

Your love and care is admirable and hopefully they will always remember such love.  Do you think they will hold onto it very long when put back into their environment of distorted truth and hate? Not for a minute.  Okay maybe 2 minutes.  

I am a military chaplain.  I have seen much, I have learned much, I have encountered many muslims.  

You are young and have much to learn.  Your heart is correct but the psychological aspect of a person born into believing that Mohammad is the perfect man is something you may not fully understand.

Again, speak and study under Robert Spencer and David Horowitz.  I also suggest that you sit down with Fr. Mitch Pacwa, S.J.  I know that many of you Jesuits do not like Mitch Pacwa thinking he is a fundamentalist catholic priest but he knows more about Islam and the way they think than you do and it would be good for you to give him a chance to explain some matters to you.

God bless you, Luke.  You are a Don Quiote!

Fr. David

tom gross shader
8 years 7 months ago
Thank you for this witness to gospel values.
The dehumanization of these individuals through brutal abuse, torture and murder - all of which are well documented facts - is an intregal and strategic aspect of this false war on terror.  Any witness to gospel values related to these detainees interrupts this stream of brutality and shines a hard light on our own complicity in these crimes.  That is one reason why your witness and other's is typically criticized so harshly. 
A strong effort at this witness can be found through the National Religious Campaign Against Torture (NRCAT).  Thanks you for your example.


The latest from america

Pope Francis proclaimed that the former Bishop of Wheeling-Charleston can no longer participate in the liturgy and commands him to make amends for the harm he caused.
What started as a "Gilmore Girls"-themed trip through New England gave me and my parents far more than we had expected.
Detail from a Latin Missal (iStock/wwing)
Latin is often seen as an outdated tradition, but language student Grace Spiewak writes that it can foster pride in our global church, reminding us of our unique and complicated history.
Grace SpiewakJuly 19, 2019
Callahan was an independent scholar working at the frontier where ethics meets medicine, law and religion.