Debating 'Souled Out' II: Are the Democrats expanding their tent?

Read Part 1 or 3 of this discussion.

Dear Kathleen:


I too was struck by E.J. Dionne’s discussion of the early twentieth century work of Msgr. John Ryan. What I found particularly interesting was that Msgr. Ryan thought it necessary and valuable to make a direct connection between his faith and his politics, arguing that his call for economic justice rested "ultimately on the foundational principle that God created the earth for the sustenance of all his children; therefore, that all persons are equal in the inherent claims upon the bounty of nature." This is a fundamentally Catholic social anthropology and it led Msgr. Ryan to conclude that the subsistence wages of his day were an injustice that had to be remedied.

In order for any political platform to be coherent, as you well know, it has to be built on a solid anthropology: a set of sound principles that describe who human beings are, what they require, and what should be done to achieve it. Throughout the 1990s, as Dionne rightly points out, the anthropology or worldview of the religious right led them to conclude that Christian faith is necessarily identified with the politics and policies of the Republican Party. The opportunity now is for Christians to carve out a new philosophy of public action that is post-partisan, big enough to transcend traditional ideological barriers. Catholics are uniquely situated to meet this challenge. We have a rich and compelling tradition, as Dionne points out, of sustained reflection on what it means to be human and this, it seems to me, is the first and most fundamental political question.

Mr. Obama has taken some hits lately for seeming to lack a philosophical grounding. Michael Powell recently wrote in the New York Times “Mr. Obama, an intellectually curious man, is nothing if not pragmatic in the application of philosophy to politics, temperamentally inclined toward no strand of thinking.” I suspect that isn’t quite fair. But it is true that when it comes to clearly articulating the philosophy that undergirds his positions, Mr. Obama has been less eloquent, even hesitant, about his thinking. We saw this, I think, at the Saddleback forum.

Yet Mr. Obama’s troubles in this regard seem to mirror America’s troubles as it struggles to re-cast faith, philosophy and politics on the national stage following the exit of the religious right. And Mr. Obama’s somewhat tentative philosophical instincts also seem to reflect a Democratic Party that is in the midst of some pretty big changes. Sixteen years ago, the Governor of Pennsylvania, Bob Casey, was banned from speaking before the Democratic convention because of his pro-life views. Last night, his son, Senator Bob Casey, Jr., also pro-life, had a prime time speaking role. This seems to indicate that the times are indeed a-changing. Are these clear signs that the Democratic Party has grown more comfortable with religious and ideological diversity? Is the party expanding to fill a bigger tent?

I look forward to hearing from you.



Dear Matt,

You raise three very interesting points about the connection of faith and public life. First, whether Barrack Obama has a philosophical grounding that undergirds his policy positions. Second, are there clear signs that the Democratic Party has grown more comfortable with religious and ideological diversity? And, third is the party expanding to fill a bigger tent?

The answer to the last two questions is YES. I have been at the Democratic Convention for the last four days. I have felt the excitement and witnessed the change in the party. There have been many forums on faith and public life. Jim Wallis, the evangelical editor of Sojourners, is a rock star here, and he is pro-life. His message is that to be pro-life one must care about life after birth—as well as before.

Bob Casey, Jr.—whose father was prohibited from speaking at the 1992 convention—has been welcomed in the Democratic Party today. What a change. He has spoken eloquently about his faith. And, his message is wise. Casey argues that people of faith must, first, listen, so that we can learn from others. Faith defined as hearing what others say is in itself a shift from the unfortunate caricature of religion as close-minded and didactic.

And, the big tent in the Democratic Party also includes vets. I have attended a number of events that celebrate the contributions of veterans. Part of last night was a tribute to the many men and women who are serving our nation.

Finally, on the day when the first African American was nominated by a major party, the proceedings ended with a benediction from one of my heroes: Sister Catherine Pinkerton, the founder of NETWORK, a social action advocacy group in Washington D.C.

The question of Obama’s philosophical grounding may take a few more entries, written with a little more time, something not easily found in the chaos of a convention! One point: Joe Biden’s argument that we are all equal, that no one is better than us, could be the beginning of a uniquely American, faith-based philosophy. His point about the dignity of work is a big part of Catholic social thought. Each of us wishes to contribute to society, to feel that our work is important, to be able to say to our family and community. “I have produced. I take care of my family. I am human.”

Biden also spoke about the conversations families have over the kitchen table. People are worried about the price of gas, the declining value of their home, and the bills that keep going up. Yet we are not alone, Biden said, we all share these same worries and dreams. We are very much connected to one another. (Some in the Republican Party seem to believe that we are alone, but that’s a subject for another conversation.)

I assume that Barrack Obama chose Biden because they did share these common values…and a commitment to the common good. Tonight, we shall hear more.

All best,


Comments are automatically closed two weeks after an article's initial publication. See our comments policy for more.
virginia parker
10 years 1 month ago
Right above the post a comment invitation on this web page is another invitation: an invitation to explore service opportunities through the Jesuit Volunteer Corps. As an FJV(Seattle, WA, '72-73), it was a pleasure upon reading Senator's Biden's autobiography PROMISES TO KEEP to discover that both Joe's son and daughter-in-law were also Jesuit Volunteers in the inner city of the Pacific Northwest. Joe also has a nephew who generously served a year in Seattle as a volunteer working with the homeless. Most of us know that Senator Casey is also a Former Jesuit Volunteer, having worked as an inner city teacher in Philadelphia. And, coincidentally(?), Jim Wallis mentions in his book FAITHWORKS that his brother once served as an Area Director for th JVC Midwest. WOW! Is it possible that with all these Jesuitical interconnections among America's great leaders, our whole dear country is about to be "ruined for life," as the JVC slogan goes, and we're actually heading not toward damnation but salvific RUINATION???????????? What an Uncommon Good that would be. ' as the JVC slogan goes , and that we may be on the pathway to
James McPhillips
10 years 1 month ago
I must comment on the last few statements in this atricle. Joe Biden is a hypocrite, pretending to be concerned about what we discuss at the "kitchen table" - the taxpayers pay for HIS gas and HIS train-fare to Washington. Plus he must have cringed to see young Bob Casey speak at the convention, since he is all FOR abortion, just like Obama. And Biden hypocritically proclaims what a "great" Catholic he is. It sadens me to see a Jesuit paper,which I have enjoyed reading up to now, allow people who have the opposite thoughts of Jesus to publish their views . Jim McPhillips
10 years 1 month ago
A note of caution: Single issue voting may be easy, but responsible voting requires more thought and discernment. I am a Catholic convert who grew up evangelical. I can tell you that the neocons who have been elected on the basis of their stance on Roe v. Wade have a world view that is not consistent with a responsible Catholic world view (and often hostile toward Catholics). The concept of the common good and social responsibility, not to mention stewardship of the environment are all but absent in their political agenda.
10 years 1 month ago
How to promote the common good and be socially responsible for others (economic/educational/military policy) can be charitably debated by good Catholics on both sides. We have that Christian freedom. Abortion, >>embryonic<< stem cell research, and homosexual "marriage" are not debatable by good Catholics who remain faithful to the Holy See and Our Lord. As Catholics we must vote for candidates that promote the most moral good, or, at least mitigate the evil relative to the other candidate(s). The most tragic lie that Satan has foisted onto this world is the lack of moral outrage at the murder of 1 Million innocent, helpless human beings every year in the US. There is no greater responsibility to the common good than the defense of the innocent from murder. A candidate that has a chance to improve that effort to save that many innocent lives will be more in accord with the Church than a candidate that will improve the minimum wage but continue to allow instituationalized murder of innocents, or worse, make it easier or more acceptable. Who cares what party they are? Take each race (local/state/federal) one at a time, know what the Church teaches, and vote with the mind of Christ's Church.
10 years 1 month ago
Why doesn't America just come out and flatly endorse Obama? For a second, I thought I was reading an Obama campaign blog. Fr. Malone and Ms. Townsend sound as if the democratic party is the only one that cares about ordinary people and that the Republicans could care less (most of the time, I feel the opposite). It would also seem that as long as there is a few pro-life democrats out there, then we can just ignore the fact that the bulk of the party is in the hip pocket of Planned Parenthood and the like. If this magazine is going to dabble this much into politics, they could at least have the integrity to keep it balanced.


The latest from america

While recommitting to help, L.I.R.S. and the U.S. bishops called on the Trump administration to “commit to immigration policies that are humane and uphold each individual’s human dignity.”
J.D. Long-GarcíaOctober 17, 2018
Caroline McClain, 16, sits on the ruins of her family's Mexico Beach vacation home after Hurricane Michael. Photo by Atena Sherry.
Human-driven climate change is intensifying tropical cyclones across the globe, climatologists say, but the role it played in the tragedy at Mexico Beach is both subtle and surprising.
Mario ArizaOctober 17, 2018
Our faith tells us that Christ chose to suffer on our behalf and that when we choose to do the same, in the service of others, we imitate Jesus in our own lives.
Terrance KleinOctober 17, 2018
Let’s begin to enlist both left and right in service of the vulnerable—using the ideological language they already accept.
Simcha FisherOctober 17, 2018