Francis of Assisi: The Life and Afterlife of a Medieval Saint: July-August Catholic Book Club Selection

As the ballots were being read during the papal conclave last March, it soon became clear to the cardinal electors that Jorge Bergoglio of Argentina would be named pope. When the two-thirds majority was reached, Cardinal Claudio Hummes—a member of the Order of Friars Minor—comforted Bergoglio, who was seated next to him at the conclave. Hummes embraced him, and said: remember the poor. Pope Francis has since explained that at this moment the name “Francis” came into his mind. He thought of the Poor Man of Assisi. He recalled St. Francis’ love for the poor and his commitment to peace.

In his exceptional compendium—for this book is more than a biography—on the life and legacy of Francis of Assisi, Andre Vauchez offers a profound analysis of the Poor Man, his insights into authentic witness to Christ, the religious and cultural context out of which his band of penitents emerged and how Francis’ novel enterprise began to deviate from the dream he held for the life and mission of his Friars Minor. After presenting the life of Francis, Vauchez describes Francis’ death, analyzes the various accounts of his death, and introduces the idea of a second death for Francis. The second death dims the evangelical fire and innovation of the Poor Man of Assisi and replaces the flesh and blood Francis with a concept of Francis. Ironically, this is exactly the inclination that Francis fought against his entire life. To know the gospel was not to do the gospel. The Poor Man rejected the concept, the word, for the Word—living and gesticulating and exemplifying a human life clinging to Jesus Christ. Perhaps, with the name and orientation of Pope Francis I, the Poor Man of Assisi is experiencing a second birth. But who was the Poor Man of Assisi, stripped of centuries of saccharine saintly veneer?

Advertisement

Two themes dominate Andre Vauchez’ analysis of St. Francis: poverty and authenticity. The themes embody Francis, the actual person who died in 1226. I organize my brief presentation of Vauchez’ rich account on these two concepts.

Poverty

After his “turnaround” from knight in training to serious Christian penitent, Francis began to attract men to him on account of his example of penance and life of preaching. As the band of penitents grew, Francis sought approval from Pope Innocent III to affirm the way of life of his small fraternity. They were called the Poor Minors. Later, the group adopted the name Friars Minor. Vauchez clarifies the meaning of the socio-cultural term minoritas. The term signified: “the condition and spiritual state of those who were deprived of power and influence by the fact of their poverty, but also to their lack of learning, their physical illness, or their marginality: in short, the neglected and little people who depended for their survival on Providence and the charity of others” (64). At once, the name identifies the orientation of the group. In the first decade of the Friars Minor, the group was composed of men from various economic backgrounds. The wealthy and educated lived alongside the poor and unlettered. There was no separation between choir monk and lay brother (46). Initially, clerics had no distinction from the other friars aside from their responsibility to offer Mass for the group. The way of life is further delineated in Francis’ rule of 1221: “The rule and life of these friars is this: to live in obedience, in chastity and without anything of one’s own, and to follow the teaching and footprints of Jesus Christ” (105). Francis saw total poverty as crucial to the Minors, because, as Vauchez reasons, for Francis

[T]he less a human being possesses, the more he or she belongs to God: the sovereign Good who is at the origin of all goods, to whom it is proper to give back these goods in a prayer of praise and gratitude. To live in poverty is to return to the perfection of the beginning—that of Adam before the Fall—and to rediscover the only true wealth, which is that of shared love (106).

Vauchez continues to explain Francis’ disdain for money. For Francis, who was remarkably sensitive to the incarnational reality of the Christian God, money reduces things that have dignity in themselves to a monetary value. Money represents a distortion, that is, “by using monetary coinage as a gauge of value, the human person was taking the place of God, who created them, leading to a kind of diabolical transubstantiation” (108). St. Francis sensed that such distortions regarding money permeated religious life as well, and he sought to keep the Minors clear of the ambiguities of traditional religious poverty which was “voluntary and not lived on a daily basis” (109). Yet, as Vauchez explains, at the end of his life, Francis did not identify poverty as a defining aspect of his own vocation. In his Testament, written in the last year of his life, Francis writes about his encounter with the lepers as that which brought him into the life of the minoritas. Vauchez explains:

[T]he fundamental experience he emphasizes is the encounter with lepers, which had shaken up his life by getting him to enter the world of the excluded. These certainly included the indigent; but in letting it be understood that neither the desire to become poor nor the refusal of ownership constituted the decisive factors of his vocation, he was reminding the brothers that at the center of the project of the Minors is the desire to follow in the footprints of Christ and to fully embrace the logic of the Cross, which leads, here and now, to a reversal of values (133).

For Francis, poverty is an aspect of conforming to the charity demonstrated by Christ. The Poor Man of Assisi practiced radical poverty so as to follow Christ.

Authenticity

Vauchez is quite clear that Francis’ contemporaries did not seek out the Poor Man of Assisi because of his good looks, his preaching, his learning or his ability to heal. What they saw in him was authenticity. They saw sincerity. They saw honesty in the way he lived his life and preached the gospel. Vauchez describes it this way:

Others before him [St. Francis]—hermits, recluses or pious pilgrims, but also Cathar bons hommes or Waldensian preachers—had been able to impress people by their austerity or their edifying lives. But in Francis, they vaguely perceived something more: his strength of conviction fascinated them, but even more so did his total sincerity, his constant refusal to allow the least distance between the exterior and the interior, between word and action aim at making it real in this world (74).

Vauchez further describes the novelty of Francis this way:

In contrast to his contemporary St. Dominic, his primary objective was not to defend the Church against its adversaries or even to proclaim sacred doctrine by refuting the errors of heretics, but to communicate to all men and women of his day the fundamental certitudes that animated him: God is good and full of love; we must praise him for having sent into the world his Son, who has suffered for us and wants to save us; the human person has the obligation to respond with such care by changing his or her life without delay, for the day of judgment approaches (78).

Discussion

I urge members of the Catholic Book Club to read this book that brings Francis down to earth. He loved others, he loved the church (including the hierarchy and the Popes Innocent III and Gregory IX) and he loved Christ. He was devoted to the presence of Christ in the Eucharist and respected priests as bearers of the Eucharist. He was stubborn and complicated, and he loved with all his heart. Vauchez’s account of Francis and Cusato’s translation from the French have enriched my faith and nourished my mind and heart.

And so, I offer some questions. Most of my presentation above considers Vauchez’ portrait of Francis. There is much more to this a compendium, and, perhaps, our discussion can include some of the other material in the book.

1. What do you think of the immediate deviation of the Friars Minor from Francis’ vision after the saint’s death? Was it inevitable? Was it partly Francis’ fault for not penning a detailed, juridical rule? Is this simply the reality of a successful organization evolving to institution?

2. What do you find interesting in Francis’ relationship to Scripture? How does his relationship with the word of God differ from that of the scholar-clerics like Bonaventure who would later help define the identity of the Friars Minor?

3. What have you learned about St. Francis and the first decades of the Friars Minor? Are there any surprises? What was the Poor Man of Assisi’s greatest innovation or gift to the church?

Browse past Catholic Book Club selections and interviews with CBC authors.

Comments are automatically closed two weeks after an article's initial publication. See our comments policy for more.
John Donaghy
4 years 3 months ago
I read Vauchez in January, before making a personal pilgrimage to Italy in February, with four days in Assisi. One aspect that I especially recall is his taking on "poverty" and "minoritas" was related to his incarnational spirituality. God became flesh in Jesus - a poor man, among the poor - and died on a cross between two thieves. Though I don't remember if Vauchez ever referred to Paul hymn of the kenotic - emptying Christ in Philippians 2, I think that the emptying of God in Christ is central to understanding Francis' understanding of poverty and identification with the minors - the marginalized - of this world. Perhaps I need to re-read Vauchez.
Kevin Spinale
4 years 2 months ago
Mr. Donaghy, I think that you are quite right in connect Francis of Assisi's notion of poverty to the reality of the Incarnation. Francis' notion of the Incarnation of Jesus Christ underpinned his devotion to the Eucharist and the institutional Church (Vauchez, 133). Furthermore, the Incarnation inspired joy in Francis - a joy which "comes from the certitude of being loved by a God who had extended the meaning of love all the way to saving the human race through the Incarnation and Passion of Christ." (Vauchez, 254) Lastly, Vauchez makes clear that Francis' piety was concrete and tangible: "Christ is neither the Eternal Word, master of wisdom, nor the loving spouse of the soul; he is the crucified Redeemer...indeed, in his eyes, the passion of Christ marks the summit of the Incarnation of divine love." (258) Thus, one's coherence to Christ's life involves poverty: "To enter into the truth and life of Christ, it was thus necessary to become one, as much as possible, with the indigent and marginalized - all those who, like him, were rejected and disdained by the society of the secure. For Francis, the poor and humble not only constitute the necessary instruments of the salvation of the rich and powerful, as the tradition understanding of the Psalms would have it. They are images of Christ and acquired by this fact their own human and spiritual dignity....'To live according to the Holy Gospel' thus meant for him and for those who would follow him to change their relationship with the Other and to live in contact with the excluded - without necessarily becoming blood brothers or sisters - in such away as to abolish the distance that separates word from life and to give to the world all its effectiveness." (Vauchez, 258-259)
Barbara Guerin
4 years 3 months ago
I noticed that there will be an online discussion of this book on Aug 16. How does one participate in that discussion?
Geneva Haertel
4 years 2 months ago
Isthere a discussion on August 16th? How do we get to participate? Looking forward to the exchange! Geneva
Tim Reidy
4 years 2 months ago

The conversation will be held on this page on August 16. Feel free to post your questions/comments here in advance. Thanks for your interest!

Geneva Haertel
4 years 2 months ago
OK--thanks for the info!
Geneva Haertel
4 years 2 months ago
Father Spinale asks about the relationship of Francis to scripture. Francis' concern that the members of the fraternity not get "too" absorbed in the word and scripture was enlightening--so, Francis was afraid that the brothers would get too absorbed in the intellectual (head over heart). Francis was telling us to "live" the gospel--not just read it and think about it--but "do" it! Pouring over manuscripts and sacred texts is insufficient-you have to "do" the gospel ! In corporate America, management says you have to "walk the walk" not just indulge in "talking the talk." Geneva
Kevin Spinale
4 years 2 months ago
Ms Haertel, Greetings. I just had a wonderful conversation with the translator of Vauchez' book, Fr Michael Cusato (the podcast should be up next week). We discussed one of the Chapters toward the end of Vauchez' book on the relationship between Francis and Scripture. I want to quote three passages to address your point about authenticity. 1. Vauchez writes: "In every divine word, Francis first saw an invitation to begin to do something so that the words might become life through the personal commitment of the speaker or reader." (264) 2. Then - "In the life of Christ, Francis had a predilection for the figure of the newly born Jesus and for the dying Jesus: that is, the moments of the greatest weakness of the God-made-man. But he did not remain outside the biblical text: in recomposing it, he placed himself in a parallel, if not identical situation to that of Christ in order to discover from the inside that which could have been the concrete life and feelings of the Son of Man, who was born in a stable, suffered the suffering of the world, and identified himself with it in the Passion." (265) In order to live as a Christian, one must enter into the concrete life of Christ - one which involves suffering. 3. Lastly - "The 'form of life' of the Minors is nothing other than a spiritual fidelity to the letter of the evangelical text, considered as the touchstone of Christian behavior and the standard against which all religious observances of the friars had to be measured." (269) A Franciscan is not a Franciscan until he or she commits to concrete, authentic actions that incarnate or enflesh the words of the gospel.
kyle gregg
4 years 1 month ago
good choice for july-august. i look forward to another good choice for this month
Bruce Snowden
4 years 1 month ago
Simply, plainly and without pretense the Little Poor Man lived as Jesus lived, a hard thing to do without total conviction. He was a literalist and a romantic, an unusual combination, but that's why he succeeded, whereas the Brothers who followed him down to this day, have always looked for compromise, for a way out, so to speak restructuring and reforming original idealism. Yet we have managed to productively keep alive our Father's first impressions, growing in grace and along the way productive in impetus to keep it going, by producing not only saints but also important Franciscan scholars and scholarship, enlightening the Church whom Francis intensely loved. The latter is so contrary to what Francis originally intended, but Providentially proven necessary to better image what Francis of Assisi was all about, a lot more than for the birds! So deeply was the imprint of Jesus on his persona, that, towards the end of his earthly life that imprint became mystically visible, marked with, or stigmatized as they say with visible proof of Jesus's salvific mission. That's why for fiftytwo years I'm struggled to be truly Franciscan, difficult to personally define, thirtyfive of those Francioscan years in the Secular Order and grateful for it.

Advertisement

Don't miss the best from America

Sign up for our Newsletter to get the Jesuit perspective on news, faith and culture.

The latest from america

Imtiaz Cajee, nephew of Ahmed Timol, poses with his book about the activist on Aug. 24 in the North Gauteng High Court in Pretoria, South Africa. (AP Photo, File)
A judge has overturned a finding of suicide and ruled that Ahmed Timol was murdered by South Africa’s Security Police 45 years ago.
Anthony EganOctober 23, 2017
Activists with Planned Parenthood demonstrate in support of a pregnant 17-year-old being held in a Texas facility for unaccompanied immigrant children to obtain an abortion, outside of the Department of Health and Human Services in Washington, Friday, Oct. 20, 2017.
Texas bishops: "No one -- the government, private individuals or organizations -- should be forced to be complicit in abortion."
Catholic News ServiceOctober 23, 2017
It is time for the laity to speak out and act like true disciples of Christ in spreading the joy of the Gospel. 
Thomas J. ReeseOctober 23, 2017
Pope Francis speaks from the Vatican as he addresses Canadian youths in a video message that was included in a Salt and Light Television program on Oct. 22 (CNS photo/courtesy Holy See Press Office).
“The world, the church, are in need of courageous young people, who are not cowed in the face of difficulties," the pope said.
Michael J. O’LoughlinOctober 23, 2017