The top vote-getter in New Hampshire means nothing

Marco Rubio didn’t win Iowa, but he won in Iowa by finishing ahead of Ted Cruz and Donald Trump in more populated counties, such as Polk (Des Moines), that come closer to resembling the United States as a whole. Similarly, Hillary Clinton probably won’t win the New Hampshire primary, but she could very well win the two counties (Hillsborough and Rockingham) that are more suburban, and thus more predictive of future primaries, than the quirky, all-white, liberal small towns that typify northern New England and almost nowhere else.

Would it be fair for Clinton to become the frontrunner for the Democratic nomination after losing New Hampshire and essentially tying in Iowa? Would it be fair for Rubio to become the favorite for the GOP nomination after finishing third in Iowa and perhaps third in New Hampshire as well? From a mathematical point of view, yes.

Advertisement

Think of public opinion polls. Because different demographic groups have different response rates, it’s too costly and time-consuming to keep calling people until you get a sample size that reflects the voting population. What if your random phone calls produce a sample of 700 men and 300 women? The solution is to “weigh” the women’s responses more heavily so that their preferences end up accounting for half the poll results. In that situation, if the men break 2-to-1 for Donald Trump and the women break 3-to-1 for Marco Rubio, the pre-weighed result would put Trump ahead, but that that wouldn’t reflect reality. The weighed results would put Rubio a bit ahead, and that would better capture an electorate where women vote in numbers as great (usually greater) than men.

The Washington Post’s Jeff Guo has a good explainer on why Rubio was treated as the winner coming out of Iowa, and it’s not as facile as Rubio beating the expectations the media set before the caucuses: “In Iowa, Rubio was especially successful in more urban, educated, places, while Trump and Cruz battled it out for the rest of the state. The results could be summed up by this narrative: Trump seemed to represent a shrinking, in part dying segment of America. Rubio represented the opposite—a growing, and more educated group of voters. Cruz's voters shared characteristics with Trump's, though the numbers didn't tell as dramatic a trend.”

In a preview of Iowa, I noted the “loser” counties with declining population and wondered whether Trump would do well in places that feel left behind by the 21st-century economy. He did pretty well in these counties, but Rubio caught up to him in the minority of counties that are growing. Since most of America’s voting population live in growing counties, and in counties with more college graduates and more religious diversity than the Iowa counties where Ted Cruz dominated, there is a sound basis to the theory that Rubio is more likely to win later primaries in states like California, Maryland and North Carolina.

We’ll see whether last weekend’s debate slows Rubio’s momentum in New Hampshire, but if he does well in the Boston exurbs in the southern part of the state, there’s good reason to believe he can eventually win enough delegates for the nomination. If Trump pulls out a narrow win in New Hampshire by sweeping “loser” Coos County in the far north, or if Kasich finishes strongly on the basis of the all-white, liberal, covered-bridge small towns of Grafton County, we’ll have a dramatic Tuesday night, but not necessarily a strong predictor for the rest of the primary campaign. (See “Nine Maps That Explain the New Hampshire Primary.”)

By the same reasoning, if Sanders wins big in New Hampshire on the basis of landslide margins in the most Vermont-y parts of the state, he’ll have reason to celebrate. But Berniacs will have no cause to complain if political analysts continue to dismiss his chances of winning the nomination; he’ll have to win somewhere that’s more urban, less white and a better representation of the national Democratic Party.

If that’s unfair, or an example of “spin,” there’s only one solution: Don’t let Iowa and New Hampshire be the first two states to vote anymore.

Comments are automatically closed two weeks after an article's initial publication. See our comments policy for more.
Chuck Kotlarz
1 year 11 months ago
Demographics are what they are. Demographics can present a unique perspective of where we are and where we may be headed. Interesting analysis. Cruz was no surprise with the support of Iowa Congressman Steve King but very surprising after the Iowa governor's "anybody but Cruz" endorsement.
Robert Lewis
1 year 11 months ago
If this Presidential election turns out to be between status quo candidates maneuvered into position by both political parties' establishments, America will soon be on the edge of a social revolution. The people who support Trump and Sanders have a lot in common and God help the Washington elite if someone figures out how to unite both groups! http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/video/2016/feb/09/donald-trump-bernie-sanders-supporters-similarities-video?CMP=share_btn_fb
Vince Killoran
1 year 11 months ago
This is a perceptive analysis but why is it on the AMERICA website?
L J
1 year 11 months ago
Given that Hillary lost in NH by a significant pummeling, clearly America Magazine is not only blazingly political, but ostensibly wrong in their political opinions
L J
1 year 11 months ago
Sullivan has made it clear of his political prognostications.
William Rydberg
1 year 11 months ago
Clinton has the Superdelegates sewn up, that's means whatever the election verdict, at least in all the small States. At least, that's my impression as a Canadian outsider looking in. But it's only my non-expert opinion...
Vince Killoran
1 year 11 months ago
My question wasn't about the partisan tone--just why AMERICA runs political analysis w/no religious or theological perspective.
Bill Mazzella
1 year 11 months ago
Why all the sour grapes here? The analysis was good and the results show that. He did not predict who would win but laid out the significance and the variables. It has always been Jesuitical to get you to think. Sullivan did not do anything against Ignatian principles. If you need a retreat there are plenty available...
L J
1 year 11 months ago
Bill, in the words of Senator Bernie Sanders, "Madame, that was a low blow"
Vince Killoran
1 year 11 months ago
And, if I want political analysis I can watch, listen, and read any number of media outlets. I don't mind a political analysis here but expect some theological insight in the process. BTW, did the new AMERICA editor ban partisan comments?!
Carlos Orozco
1 year 11 months ago
Hillary Clinton is an old, corrupt politician. The psychotic godmother of ISIS in Libya and Syria. Let her feel the BERN!
J Cosgrove
1 year 11 months ago
Actually Bern did not win big. The final count among Democrats was Bern 52% Hillary 48%. The landslide was from non Democrats who voted. The rest of the country's Democrats are 44% non-white. So it should be easier for Hillary unless she gets indicted.

Advertisement

Don't miss the best from America

Sign up for our Newsletter to get the Jesuit perspective on news, faith and culture.

The latest from america

“I ask forgiveness,” the pope said on his flight from Lima to Rome. “It’s a hurt [caused] without wishing it.”
Gerard O’ConnellJanuary 22, 2018
Jesus “is here in Lima, or wherever you are living, in the routine of your daily life and work.”
Gerard O’ConnellJanuary 21, 2018
People and cheered Pope Francis everywhere he went on this last day of his visit.
Gerard O’ConnellJanuary 21, 2018