Was Obama's Trip to Latin America Useless?

From Mensaje magazine via Mirada Global:

“Obama’s useless trip” was the title that Spanish newspaper El País used to summarize the overall impression after U.S. President’s trip to Latin America last March. While it was intended to become a re-foundational moment in the relationship of the country with the region after a long period of misunderstandings, the result was disconcerting for most of the media and the elites of the region: it was a trip with a highly symbolic value and importance for El Salvador and Central America, but which lacked substantive contents of continental importance that might enable Washington to regain regional leadership....
 
The question therefore is why doesn’t the United States manage to get off this defensive and reactive position. Some answers usually concentrate in explanations related with U.S. internal polity or global dynamics, and they could be partly correct. They sustain that for the first two years Obama has had to face a huge agenda of problems which had weakened him tremendously until lately and which left —once more— Latin America among his lowest priorities. Others have pointed to more substantive difficulties, such as the relative decline of U.S. global and regional influence, and the increasing autonomy of emerging regions, including Latin America. Both factors seem to be affecting the possibility of an agenda between both parties, but they don’t seem to be a good enough explanation. To domestic restrictions and its relative decrease in power resources, we must add the fact that Washington faces increasing difficulties to agree upon policies with the most important countries of the region, difficulties that are still relevant enough to prevent a minimum basis of agreements concerning a shared continental policy.

Advertisement

Also available in Spanish.

Tim Reidy

 

Comments are automatically closed two weeks after an article's initial publication. See our comments policy for more.

Advertisement

The latest from america

Catherine Pakaluk, who currently teaches at the Catholic University of America and holds a Ph.D. in Economics from Harvard University, describes her tweet to Mr. Macron as “spirited” and “playful.”
Emma Winters October 19, 2018
A new proposal from the Department of Homeland Security could make it much more difficult for legal immigrants to get green cards in the United States. But even before its implementation, the proposal has led immigrants to avoid receiving public benefits.
J.D. Long-GarcíaOctober 19, 2018
 Archbishop Carlo Maria Vigano, then nuncio to the United States, and then-Cardinal Theodore E. McCarrick of Washington, are seen in a combination photo during the beatification Mass of Blessed Miriam Teresa Demjanovich at the Cathedral Basilica of the Sacred Heart in Newark, N.J., Oct. 4, 2014. (CNS photo/Gregory A. Shemitz)
In this third letter Archbishop Viganò no longer insists, as he did so forcefully in his first letter, that the restrictions that he claimed Benedict XVI had imposed on Archbishop McCarrick—one he alleges that Pope Francis later lifted—can be understood as “sanctions.”
Gerard O’ConnellOctober 19, 2018
Kevin Clarke tells us about his reporting from Iraq.
Olga SeguraOctober 19, 2018