The Wanderer & Me

Yesterday, a friend sent me a copy of "The Wanderer" from December 4 of last year. My posting here suggesting that Doug Kmiec be named the next U.S. ambassador to the Vatican had made the front page. I am deeply honored.

"The Wanderer" is a newspaper published in Minnesota that is about as far to the right as you can get and still be in the Catholic Church. Mind you, I believe it is a big church and there is plenty of room for everybody, including the editors in St. Paul though they seem to decline to extend the same presumption of good faith to me and mine. They are among the right-wing fringe that has forgotten that the line about being "more Catholic than the Pope" is a joke.


The article quoted from my post and then from an article (to which I am unable to link) that ran in the Catholic News Agency (CNA) which is not to be confused with the Catholic News Service (CNS). CNS is a news agency dedicated to reporting about the Church but CNA appears to have more of an ideological agenda. Their reports are free from some of the vitriol one finds in "The Wanderer" but not from the bias. CNA toes a conservative line at all times and on all stories.

What struck me about both the CNA and "TheWanderer" stories was the attribution of quotes to an "an official from the Vatican’s Secretariat of State" who spoke to CNA on the condition of anonymity. The official said that Cardinal James Stafford and Archbishop Raymond Burke, both American prelates working in the curia, considered Kmiec "a traitor" and that his appointment could not happen without upsetting Carl Anderson from the Knights of Columbus.

Where I come from, calling a fellow Catholic "a traitor" evidences a lack of charity, to say nothing of ignorance of canon law: "Traitor" is not a canonical term, is it? I have never met Archbishop Burke, but Cardinal Stafford is a lovely and kind man, and I have a hard time imagining him calling anyone but Benedict Arnold a traitor. The same goes for Mr. Anderson. More to the point, this anonymous official purports to be speaking for them, but why should we believe that he has any authorization to do so? Indeed, while the Secretary of State could consult whomever he wants in determining how to respond to a potential ambassadorial appointment, I am sure that the prelates would keep such consultations to themselves.

There is an old saying: Those who know, don’t talk and those who talk, don’t know. This is not always true or Vatican reporters would be out of a job. But, I was under the impression that Vatican officials make an oath not to speak to the press about their work. Why then are these oh, so Catholic news outlets helping someone to violate his oath?

As to the merits of the argument, there is a tautology in the objections this anonymous Vatican official raises. If supporting Barack Obama is enough to get one labeled a traitor, and an appointment denied, it is difficult to see whom Obama could appoint. My guess is that the Vatican is savvy enough to understand that Obama won and he gets to appoint a supporter and that Doug Kmiec is not only a supporter with access to the incoming President, but he is a Catholic in good standing whose lifelong efforts to create a culture of life and decency commend him for this job. And, although I am not authorized to speak for either of them, I fancy Pope Benedict and Professor Kmiec would enjoy long conversations about Natural Law theory, the danger of relativism, and other topics of intellectual import to which both men have made significant contributions. You can quote me on that.


Comments are automatically closed two weeks after an article's initial publication. See our comments policy for more.
9 years 9 months ago
Mr. Bindner, The Secretary of State in question is the one in the Vati can, Cardinal Bertone. While I would welcome the day when there might be a female Secretary of State in the Vatican, and while the cardinalate is an entirely human institution and could, in theory, include women, I am not holding my breath that we shall see one in my lifetime. Of course, I never figured we would have a pro-life DNC chair so who knows!
9 years 9 months ago
One small correction, the Secretary of State will be (if confirmed) a she. Whether she appointes Kimec is an interesting question.
9 years 9 months ago
Mr. Winters, You and I differ on a great many things, and there is a part of me that believes that you too often place politics before faith. That being said, I want to apologize for any lack of charity I myself have demonstrated towards you. Lately I have been paying attention to some people I really admire who seem to know how to disagree civilly in a way that I do not, and too often I criticize in a personal way instead of merely addressing arguments themselves. So for any lack of charity I have exhibited towards you, I apologize.
9 years 7 months ago
JMJ Mr Winters Mr Kmiec has strayed and there is no point in wondering why. If he has any decency left, we cannot imagine that he could represent President Obama at the Vatican without feeling filthy, tainted by Obama's extremist, that is, EXTREMIST, views on the value of human life. Obama is nothing more than a common prostitute, complicit in the murder of babies. Luis Howard for the Howard Family


The latest from america

 10.17.2018 Pope Francis greets Cardinal Blase J. Cupich of Chicago before a session of the Synod of Bishops on young people, the faith and vocational discernment at the Vatican Oct. 16. (CNS photo/Vatican Media)
“We take people where they are, walking with them, moving forward,” Cardinal Blase Cupich said.
Michael J. O’LoughlinOctober 20, 2018
Catherine Pakaluk, who currently teaches at the Catholic University of America and holds a Ph.D. in Economics from Harvard University, describes her tweet to Mr. Macron as “spirited” and “playful.”
Emma Winters October 19, 2018
A new proposal from the Department of Homeland Security could make it much more difficult for legal immigrants to get green cards in the United States. But even before its implementation, the proposal has led immigrants to avoid receiving public benefits.
J.D. Long-GarcíaOctober 19, 2018
 Archbishop Carlo Maria Vigano, then nuncio to the United States, and then-Cardinal Theodore E. McCarrick of Washington, are seen in a combination photo during the beatification Mass of Blessed Miriam Teresa Demjanovich at the Cathedral Basilica of the Sacred Heart in Newark, N.J., Oct. 4, 2014. (CNS photo/Gregory A. Shemitz)
In this third letter Archbishop Viganò no longer insists, as he did so forcefully in his first letter, that the restrictions that he claimed Benedict XVI had imposed on Archbishop McCarrick—one he alleges that Pope Francis later lifted—can be understood as “sanctions.”
Gerard O’ConnellOctober 19, 2018