Three Cheers for Notre Dame

Saturday afternoon football games always feature an ad for the universities engaged in gridiron combat. These ads usually consist of pictures of happy co-eds frolicking on well trimmed lawns interspersed with shots of students in laboratories or studying at the library. Sometimes, a famous professor is mentioned, sometimes a winning NCAA team, sometimes the great location of the campus.

This past Saturday, however, a national audience tuned into the Notre Dame v. Navy game saw a different ad that focused on adult stem cell research at Notre Dame. In that ad, the voice-over describes the research being conducted using stem cells from zebra fish, which have regenerative properties the cells of a mammal lack. But, within the ad, came this sentence: "As a Catholic University, Notre Dame is committed to cutting edge research that respects the dignity of human life from conception until natural death and does not engage in human embryonic stem cell research."


Last spring, you may recall, all manner of abuse was heaped on Notre Dame, and especially on its President, Father John Jenkins. He was accused of essentially winking at the Church’s teaching on the dignity of human life by inviting the President of the United States to receive an honorary degree and deliver the commencement address. Father Jenkins made clear that the invitation, and the degree, certainly were not intended as an endorsement of the President’s views on abortion or embryonic stem cell research, and at the ceremony itself, with the President sitting next to him, Father Jenkins reiterated the Church’s teaching. A nationally televised audience watched that moment too, an audience that would not have been watching if the graduation speaker had been someone other than the President.

Saturday’s commercial, as well as the work it highlighted, shows the depth of Notre Dame’s commitment to life issues. But, it shows something else too. It shows, in the finest tradition of Christian humanism, that it is not enough to protest. It is not enough to whine or throw up our hands at the ways our culture fails to honor and promote the dignity of human life. People who suffer from degenerative diseases such as Parkinson’s Disease want a cure, not a bumper sticker. Notre Dame, by engaging in this work and telling a nationwide audience of football viewers about, is giving a profound and laudable witness to the Church’s teaching. Will the university’s critics applaud this ad?

One of them actually has. Notre Dame law professor Rick Garnett sent me the link to the ad and has written about it at his blog, Mirror of Justice. Garnett also provided the most thoughtful, non-inflammatory criticism of the university’s decision to honor the President. Garnett and I are as likely to disagree as to agree on any given political issue, but he writes from a profound commitment to the Church, a commitment that includes a willingness to engage in civil discussion and thoughtful criticism. He could not be more different from some of the fringe bloggers who uncharitably demean those with whom they disagree. Nor does Garnett indulge a nostalgic Catholic sectarianism. Neither does the University at which he labors.

Notre Dame has done more than witness to the Church’s teaching about the dignity of human life. It has given another example of what Pope Benedict calls the "great et, et." When Catholics confront technological innovations or so-called advances in research that are ethically impermissible, we do not damn technology or scholarship. We engage it and find ethically permissible ways to solve human problems. The tradition of Catholic theology is to avoid "either/or" formulations in favor of "both/and" formulations. This is a profoundly humane instinct. Whatever is authentically human, such as the desire to find cures for horrible diseases, must be embraced and it is the proper, and noble, task of a Catholic University to bring both the light of reason and the light of faith to the search for humane answers and cures.

The Notre Dame football team lost on Saturday, but the University itself won.




Comments are automatically closed two weeks after an article's initial publication. See our comments policy for more.
8 years 11 months ago
Hopefully this will become so frequent that we won't have to blog about it anymore. Wow, a Catholic University stands up for Catholic beliefs in the public square. Big news!
Brendan McGrath
8 years 11 months ago
I went to grad school at Notre Dame for its two-year Master of Theological Studies program; I graduated in May 2008.  The school is much more Catholic than many of its critics realize; high-profile events like the Obama visit skew the picture.  Of coures, my own impressions may be skewed, given that my time there centered around the Theology department, but I ate all my meals in the dining halls, and lived on campus, and in general probably got to see more of the undergraduate life than other graduate students - anyway, I would often see "normal," everyday undergrads quietly blessing themselves before a meal.  Something like 80% of maybe a bit higher of the undergrads are Catholic (the main problem lies with the low percentage of faculty who are Catholic).  Anyway, just another view.


The latest from america

 10.17.2018 Pope Francis greets Cardinal Blase J. Cupich of Chicago before a session of the Synod of Bishops on young people, the faith and vocational discernment at the Vatican Oct. 16. (CNS photo/Vatican Media)
“We take people where they are, walking with them, moving forward,” Cardinal Blase Cupich said.
Michael J. O’LoughlinOctober 20, 2018
Catherine Pakaluk, who currently teaches at the Catholic University of America and holds a Ph.D. in Economics from Harvard University, describes her tweet to Mr. Macron as “spirited” and “playful.”
Emma Winters October 19, 2018
A new proposal from the Department of Homeland Security could make it much more difficult for legal immigrants to get green cards in the United States. But even before its implementation, the proposal has led immigrants to avoid receiving public benefits.
J.D. Long-GarcíaOctober 19, 2018
 Archbishop Carlo Maria Vigano, then nuncio to the United States, and then-Cardinal Theodore E. McCarrick of Washington, are seen in a combination photo during the beatification Mass of Blessed Miriam Teresa Demjanovich at the Cathedral Basilica of the Sacred Heart in Newark, N.J., Oct. 4, 2014. (CNS photo/Gregory A. Shemitz)
In this third letter Archbishop Viganò no longer insists, as he did so forcefully in his first letter, that the restrictions that he claimed Benedict XVI had imposed on Archbishop McCarrick—one he alleges that Pope Francis later lifted—can be understood as “sanctions.”
Gerard O’ConnellOctober 19, 2018