Loading...
Loading...
Click here if you don’t see subscription options
Kevin ClarkeJuly 05, 2012

A recent exchange of warm regards between John Gehring at Faith in Public Life and the U.S.C.C.B.’s media office raised some eyebrows. Gehring had penned a June background memo for media aimed at countering some of the inevitably anti-Obama subtext of the U.S.C.C.B.’sFortnight for Freedom (a memo to the press not quite the odd bird depicted by Catholic avengers on the Internet; we get press releases all the time aimed at bending coverage, though I can’t recall having received one from Faith in Public Life before explicitly bannered as “background.”)

The media relations office eventually fired off a response; all well and good, grownups at odds over public policy, having an e-conversation with the good old fourth estate serving as mediator.

The U.S.C.C.B. response took the form of what has become an internet era classic, a fisking, a point-by-point takedown of the opponent’s missive—also not something unheard of. But what “sounded” a tad odd, coming from the bishops and not a wiseacre blogger like me, was the opening salvo that may have had more Glenn Beck than Prince of Peace in it. Mentioning George Soros in any context is red meat for a certain kind of contemporary conservative and his inclusion in the U.S.C.C.B. memo produced the predictable reaction at several Web sites. (Just take a gander at the invective at this site.) 

Now Gehring in turn has fired off a response to the response. We may yet see a response to the response to the response, but I’m not sure, being a member of the easily distracted lamestream media, if I won’t have moved on to the another internecine squabble by then.

The story behind this story was the subject of a recent NPR report, which featured Gehring and some of the media's go-to Catholic talking heads. You can tune in to that here.

Comments are automatically closed two weeks after an article's initial publication. See our comments policy for more.
Tom Maher
12 years 10 months ago
John Gehring of Faith in Public Life media memo needed to be refuted.  For example one of the points that Gehring's memo makes is  "Most Americans and Catholics support the HHS mandate and reject the Church’s concerns."  This assertion is blatantly false.  How could such public misinformation not be refuted by the Church or anyone in the public for its falseness in fact?  

The Church of cousre should actively paritcipate in public debates on public policy especially when the Church itself is impacted by goverenemnt policies as is the case with the HHS mandate.  Silence is not an option.  The Church views on public policy must be made known.
Jim McCrea
12 years 10 months ago
"The Church views on public policy must be made known."

When views become rather blatant threats of coercion, they they need to be curtailed.

The latest from america

The influence of the Synod on Synodality for the conclave—and what the result of the conclave might mean for the future of synodality
Inside the VaticanMay 03, 2025
The role of the pope is in a process of conversion from worldly monarch to world’s priest.
Zac DavisMay 03, 2025
At the Synod on Synodality, the cardinals were ‘converted’ to working together in a new way. As they join their brothers in the conclave, they face a referendum on—and resistance to—their work.
Colleen DulleMay 03, 2025
“In a time when the globalized economic and political order is crumbling—especially exposed during the Trump era—the church may well be one of the last stubborn institutions that still holds a truly global character.”
Gerard O’ConnellMay 03, 2025