The Right Thing for the Wrong Reason

Yesterday, we discussed the fall of Clinton strategist Mark Penn as a good first step in undermining the culture of campaign consultants and the sad realization that there is unlikely to be a second such step. In this morning’s Washington Post, E.J. Dionne calls attention to the other nefarious effect of the politics-as-marketing worldview that dominates contemporary consultant culture: paying attention only to the microtrends. Microtrends are those small issues and distinguishing characteristics that marketers try to use to galvanize a shift in opinion. Each of us does have certain quirks that make us more or less receptive to tailored messages. If you are selling ice cream, putting nuts in the ice cream will appeal to some people and not to those who are allergic to nuts. For some voters, the abortion issue, or how a candidate voted on the Iraq War, or the relative merits of health care proposals, may be so important, that no other issue matters. Consultants, especially pollsters, tout their ability to identify these trends and make a specific pitch to the slice of the electorate that can be motivated by a pitch discretely tailored to push that one button. Penn actually authored a book on the subject last year. Politics is not marketing. Voters may be selecting a set of policies when they elect one candidate over another, but they are selecting a person not a congeries of proposals. They want a president, not a policy paper. Some of the issues that will land on the next president’s desk are unforeseeable today, so we look for a candidate with the judgment and the ideological dispositions that can handle those yet unknown crises. The Democratic Party has been plagued since the 1970s with the kind of interest-group approach to politics that resulted in the stark fact that the last Democrat to win a majority of the electorate was Jimmy Carter in 1976. They have been unable to articulate a vision for the nation, content to over smaller visions for slices of the electorate. Democrats, in short, have been afraid of ideology. As Dionne notes, "grandiose" was "one of Penn’s preferred epithets. It is not difficult to locate the source of this inability to articulate a broad, national vision. In defending Roe, Democrats embraced the vile belief that "you can’t legislate morality." Of course, the Civil Rights legislation of the 1960s was nothing if not the legislative enactment of one moral vision over another and it should not surprise us, though it usually does, that it was the segregationists who invoked "privacy" in their battles to maintain Jim Crow. Nor should it surprise us that people who invoke Ronald Reagan as a model president are often hard-pressed to point to any particular policy successes he achieved (and there were some, most notably saving Social Security and vastly simplified the tax code). What we remember about Reagan was precisely his ability to give voice to our desire to be a great and good nation. He did not deliver the kind of policy laundry list that the Mark Penn’s of the world think hold the secret of electoral success and which characterize Clinton’s speeches. Yes, God is in the details. But, He is not only in the details. Mutatis mutandi, the same holds for politics. Michael Sean Winters
Comments are automatically closed two weeks after an article's initial publication. See our comments policy for more.

Advertisement

The latest from america

Native American protestors hold hands with parishioner Nathanial Hall, right, during a group prayer outside the Catholic Diocese of Covington on Jan. 22, 2019, in Covington, Ky. (AP Photo/John Minchillo)
The furor over a chance meeting between Catholic high school students and Native American protesters underscores the need to listen and learn from indigenous voices.
Marlene LangJanuary 23, 2019
The staggering parliamentary defeat for Prime Minister Theresa May, seen here leaving 10 Downing Street on Jan. 23, pushed the country even further from safe dry land. (AP Photo/Alastair Grant)
After the stunning defeat of Theresa May's exit deal, Scotland is looking anew at independence, and the U.K. government fears economic disaster.
David StewartJanuary 23, 2019
Michael Osborne, a film director, documents the damage from a mud slide next to his home in Los Angeles on Jan. 18, after three days of heavy rain. (AP Photo/Damian Dovarganes)
The conceit of California-as-disaster-movie is ridiculous. But maybe watching our fires and mudslides helps other states consider both their own fragility and their underlying strength.
Jim McDermottJanuary 23, 2019
A commitment to religious liberty demands that effort be devoted to resolving, rather than exacerbating, any real or apparent tension between religious obligation and civil duty.
The EditorsJanuary 23, 2019