Reflecting on the Revision

The Catholic blogosphere is abuzz with talk of yesterday’s announcement that the Obama administration has settled on some ‘changes’ to the so-called HHS mandate. Folks on both sides quickly weighed in: Grace-Marie Turner at National Review Online, for example, rendered a largely negative verdict, while James Salt, the executive director of Catholics United, told this magazine that the U.S. Bishops should consider the problem solved. Mr. Salt’s organization, of course, is a longtime apologist for the Obama administration; National Review, as everybody knows, is a longstanding critic. I have every reason to believe that National Review and Citizens United are acting in good faith; at the same time, I don’t find either organization a particularly credible source of information and analysis in this matter.

A definitive judgment of any sort seems premature. The policy issues are very complicated and the debate is fraught with anxieties. Accordingly, we should be suspicious of quick judgments. The less time it takes to render an analysis, the more facile that analysis is likely to be and the more likely it is to rely on ideological presuppositions, which are both useless and dangerous.  


It seems to me that the U.S. Bishops are doing the eminently sensible thing: They are reading and studying the document and carefully considering their response to it. “We welcome the opportunity to study the proposed regulations closely. We look forward to issuing a more detailed statement later,” Cardinal Dolan told The New York Times.

More of us should follow that same course of action. We all should resist the temptation, all the more real in the digital age, to render quick and headline-grabbing judgments about morally vexing and complex matters of public policy.

Comments are automatically closed two weeks after an article's initial publication. See our comments policy for more.
Kevin Murphy
5 years 6 months ago
I see from Mr. Salt's profile on Catholic United's website that he "...oversaw the Kansas Democratic Party's faith outreach efforts, including messaging work for Governor Sebelius and development of faith-based messaging resources." The fact that Mr. Salt worked for Ms. Sebelius, who is formulating the rules, and that Catholic United's Press Release on the topic proclaims "Catholics Celebrate [Celebrate?] HHS Mandate Fix as All-Around Victory" and "As predicted last year, the Obama Administration worked successfully to alleviate concerns of religious groups," Father Malone is quite right to term Catholics United a "longtime apologist for the Obama adminstration." Also, as detailed in Kevin Clarke's Revision Response entry, Mr. Salt seems to blame the whole mess on the USCCB and not the Obama Adminstration which, I believe, purposefully picked this unnecessary fight for political purposes, i.e. as part of its "war on women" meme. Father Malone is correct to let cooler heads prevail.
ed gleason
5 years 6 months ago
" "Fr Malone is correct to let cooler heads prevail' See A/B Chaput ..update II .


The latest from america

The editors offer a few key steps for leaders of the church to take in response to the Pa. grand jury report.
The EditorsAugust 17, 2018
This week, we talk with Julio Ricardo Varela, founder of Latino Rebels, a website founded in 2011 that provides news, analysis and commentary about U.S. Latino culture.
Olga SeguraAugust 17, 2018
"The Catholic Cook Book," published in 1965, is exactly that: a cookbook for Catholics and those who want to learn about Catholicism and how it relates to food.
Vivian CabreraAugust 16, 2018
Cardinal Donald W. Wuerl of Washington is pictured as Pope Francis celebrates Mass in Washington Sept. 23, 2015. (CNS photo/Paul Haring)
“Those who have suffered are his priority, and the Church wants to listen to them to root out this tragic horror.”