Loading...
Loading...
Click here if you don’t see subscription options
Raymond A. Schroth, S.J.December 27, 2013
Player attempts to make tackle during football practice at Maryland Catholic high school. (CNS photo /Bob Roller)

The second week of December was a rough one on the home front. The Washington Post told us that beyond the massacre at Newtown, 71 children had been killed by gunfire in 2012. In Colorado, a high school student armed with a just-bought shotgun set out to get even with one of his teachers, but shot two students and killed himself. In New York, a fraternity took a pledge to a distant house in the country and, in the course of bouncing him around blindfolded, killed him.

But the story that I can’t shake is about a Boston College junior on the football team, Spenser Rositano, who on October 12, during the Clemson game, sat in the locker room with his head throbbing and blood bubbling up in his mouth because of lung contusions sustained in the first half. He had a blank look on his face. It wasn’t clear if he knew where he was.

This had happened five times before, three while playing football in high school and three at Boston College. Before, the symptoms had eventually gone away. This time the headaches and dizziness went on for three weeks. He was beginning to think that maybe he had kept playing football for too long. According to Post reporter Brandon Parker, a recent NFL-funded report said that between 1.6 million and 3.8 million sports and recreation-related traumatic brain injuries, including concussions, occur every year. Furthermore, once the player has one, he is likely to have more, and the recovery time gets longer with each one. Shortly before his 21st birthday, Spenser quit.

During high school he had not always admitted the symptoms; it was at Boston College that helmet-to-helmet hits had brought on dizziness, the sensation of walking in a fog, a dream-like state. In the Army game a hit sent him into the air; but he can’t remember it. The doctors informed him that there is not much one can do about these symptoms. To play cautiously was contrary to his nature, it would not be playing his best; and he knew from his reading that it could be 30 years before he would know the full extent of his injuries.

The tone of the Post’s coverage was supportive and I was relieved that the wisdom of parents, friends and coaches helped guide him to quit.

But why did it take so long? The NFL and a whole series of independent medical institutions have been studying the effects of concussions for over 20 years. Some results were contradictory, but the evidence of harm seems overwhelming. Thousands of former NFL players have filed lawsuits, including a 2011 complaint which argued that NFL should have know that players who sustain head injuries risk “early onset of Alzheimer’s Disease, dementia, depression, deficits in cognitive functioning, reduced processing speed, attention and reasoning, loss of memory, sleeplessness, mood swings, personality changes, and the debilitating and latent disease known as Chronic traumatic encephalopathy (CTE).” Months later three retired players killed themselves, two with shotguns.

According to a Frontline report (Oct. 31, 2013), most Americans were aware that football could cause long-term brain damage, but only one in three said this knowledge would make them less likely to let their son play. The report found a “culture among athletes” that resists self-reporting of the damage. They say the game is more important than their individual health and that “they may play through a concussion to avoid letting down their teammates, coaches, schools and parents.”

Apparently they presume that their teammates, coaches and parents all agree that the game is more important than the future lives of any of these young men. If that is so we might as well be back in ancient Rome yelling thumbs down for some blood-spattered gladiator.

As Ken Reed points out in the Huffington Post (Oct. 23, 2013), 20 percent of high school football players sustain brain injuries in any given season. “It’s a classic case of avoidance behavior. As a nation, we love football and don’t want to deal with the giant elephant in the room: football is a game that’s inherently dangerous to the human brain, and there’s really not much we can do about it. Football is our great escape. It’s fun. It’s entertainment. We don’t want reality to intrude.”

Under these circumstances it is also immoral. Where are the pro-life preachers, the ethicists? There is a strong argument that high school football should be outlawed and that no one with a brain injury should be permitted to play college football. Let us entertain ourselves with soccer, basketball, track and swimming — as well as reading and working. Life is too short and precious to wreck a young man’s brain.

Comments are automatically closed two weeks after an article's initial publication. See our comments policy for more.
Bill Mazzella
11 years 5 months ago
I didn't allow my son to play football. He is now 42 years old. That was a long time ago when I decided this because of the severe injuries that were occurring to young people. But I continued to be an enthusiastic fan of the sport. There is a disconnect. Not as bad as boxing but pretty close. As Barry Sanders , a superb running back who retired early, said; "Every play out there is a heavy weight fight.

The latest from america

This week on “Jesuitical,” Zac and Ashley talk with U.S. Senator Chris Coons, the senior Democratic senator from Delaware.
JesuiticalJune 13, 2025
Benicio del Toro and Mia Threapleton in a scene from "The Phoenician Scheme" (TPS Productions/Focus Features via AP)
‘The Phoenician Scheme‘ centers on sin and redemption, the frail but fundamental hope that anyone can be saved, if they sincerely repent.
John DoughertyJune 13, 2025
No one I knew in Los Angeles was afraid to go downtown. That is, they were unafraid until President Donald Trump called in the National Guard and then the Marines.
Jason BlakelyJune 13, 2025
Soldiers of Ukraine's 30th Separate Mechanized Brigade fire a rocket toward Russian positions at the front line in the Donetsk region of Ukraine on Tuesday, June 3, 2025. (AP Photo/Andrii Marienko, File)
It is fair to say that the global tab for addressing the world’s acute humanitarian or ecological needs pales in comparison to the eye-watering amounts governments unabashedly dole out for bombs and bullets.
Kevin ClarkeJune 12, 2025