The initiative with the Russian Orthodox church offers a promising new global relationship

The surprise announcement from Rome today of the upcoming meeting between Moscow Patriarch Kirill and Pope Francis “shows definitively Francis' vocation as a pontiff, a bridge builder,” Manhattan College Assistant Professor of Religious Studies Kevin Ahern says.

He commented via e-mail this morning. “[Pope Francis] is confronting the walls of indifference in regards to migration and refugees and also the walls that are dividing people in the church,” Ahern says. “I believe it is significant that this meeting is happening as both leaders are on missions to Latin America. True unity and true dialogue can only be found in common mission.”


This historic meeting, scheduled for Feb. 12 in Cuba, is something “many have wanted to happen for over 50 years,” he adds. “Benedict really wanted to develop a relationship with the Russians, especially over Europe's Christian roots.”

However welcome the meeting is to the wider Christian world, it will surely also be the source of anxiety within specific faith communities. “The Eastern Catholic churches will find this difficult,” Ahern says. “I imagine the Ukrainian Catholics will wonder what this means, given there is still a war in their country.” Ahern will be watchful to see how much that conflict will factor in any upcoming discussions between the Holy See and the Russian Orthodox church.

As exciting as this morning’s announcement has been, Ahern is already looking beyond the meeting in Cuba. “Might this then put the pope in a situation to bridge divides between the Russian and Greek [Orthodox churches]?” he asks. “A big moment for the ecumenical vision of Vatican II would be a meeting between the pope, the Russians and the Greeks.

“The role of Cuba in bringing about this meeting is very interesting,” he adds. Ahern wonders if the meeting already suggests fruit from the Holy See's recent efforts to normalize relations between Cuba and the United States and the connections with Cuban official made during that initiative. “Clearly, Cuba presents itself as a neutral space,” Ahern says. “There was no way for them to meet in Russia or definitively not in Rome. So here we have a very strange situation where months after the Holy See helps to negotiate between the United States and Cuba, Cuba is helping to host this meeting.”

In terms of other areas of global concern to the Holy See, warmer relations with the Russian Orthodox church and by extension presumably political leadership in Moscow “might also help address two of Pope Francis' major agenda items this year: the Syrian Crisis and China.”

Ahern says, “I would expect some movement on joint Catholic-Orthodox support for Christians in the Middle East. But in a way that may tone down the unquestioned support for Assad.”

Pope Francis has also recently made efforts to reach out to Beijing and “this meeting may also help provide Russian support for the church's new efforts in China.”

“This is a very tricky situation," Ahern says. "Like the Eastern Catholics and Russia, many Catholics in the China region (including bishops in Hong Kong) do not want the pope to dialogue with [Beijing].” It would appear that Pope Francis will have to do more than just build bridges in the future; he’ll have to get folks on either side to join him in walking across them.

Comments are automatically closed two weeks after an article's initial publication. See our comments policy for more.
Crystal Watson
1 year 11 months ago
Kirill is kind of a scary person - close ties to Putin, former KGB, efforts to censor art ( and tell women what to wear ( A past article from TIME magazine - "Putin's Reunited Russian Church" ...,8599,1622544,00.html
William Rydberg
1 year 11 months ago
Patriarch Kirill is a Russian to the Core. I may not always agree, but I respect. My only fear is the same one I have about all National Orthodox Churches - namely, the centripetal tendency to being more "Russian" than "Orthodox". Naturally, we ought to refresh ourselves with the meanings of Catholic and Orthodox. Because the Early Apostolic Fathers of the Church used the terms interchangeably. But that's a convo for another day... I think that all would agree that the same could be said about any hyphenated National Church - the Anglicans come to mind, but they don't officially call themselves Anglo-Catholics, since this according to their professions is what they claim to be. Bottom line, Patriarch Kirill has a lot of challenges on his plate, in my opinion, its the Holy Spirit working both the Pope and him. Because, its a lot easier to remain with the status quo than to seek change - but look at the benefits from St John XXIII's announcement back in 1958. Just my opinion... Blessed be the Holy Trinity!


Don't miss the best from America

Sign up for our Newsletter to get the Jesuit perspective on news, faith and culture.

The latest from america

Pro-life advocates participate in the annual March for Life in Washington January 2017. (CNS photo/Tyler Orsburn)
Describing abortion as a “key social evil” in the United States, the Jesuits say: “The most fundamental building block of a just social order is respect for human life.”
America StaffJanuary 19, 2018
Men carry a replica of Peru's most revered religious icon, the "Lord of Miracles," during an Oct. 18, 2017 procession in Lima. Each year thousands of Catholics gather to commemorate the image's survival in a 17th-century earthquake that destroyed Lima. (CNS photo/Mariana Bazo, Reuters)
Father Ernesto Cavassa was provincial of the Jesuits in Peru from 1998 to 2004, and president of the Conference of Latin American Jesuit Provincials from 2005 to 2012.
Gerard O’ConnellJanuary 18, 2018
For over 45 years, Feminists for Life has been committed to ending the practice and legality of abortion and promoting the feminism of Susan B. Anthony.
Serrin M. FosterJanuary 18, 2018
A President Donald Trump supporter is see seen at the annual March for Life in Washington Jan. 27. (CNS photo/Tyler Orsburn)
During their tenure in office, President Ronald Reagan, President George H.W. Bush and President George W. Bush all addressed the march via telephone or a radio hookup from the Oval Office.
Catholic News ServiceJanuary 18, 2018