Obama's First Press Conference

President Barack Obama’s first prime time press conference was a case study in effective political communication. Not only did he get all three major networks to cover the press conference live, guaranteeing a huge audience, he filled the full hour with thoughtful and thorough answers to the questions posed: When he was done, the networks had no time to devote to analysis of the event so the only voice most Americans heard was Obama’s.

His most significant achievement was to change the narrative about bi-partisanship. Having made unprecedented efforts to reach out to the GOP, and realizing such meager agreement with them, Obama risked having his expected legislative victory on the stimulus bill turn into a defeat because it was not "bi-partisan." Obama insisted last night that he would continue to reach out to Republicans but that it was up to them to come to terms with him. "That’s what the election was all about," he insisted.

Advertisement

No one can admit that we don’t know how well the stimulus will work. Indeed, one of the questions, from Chuck Todd, pointed to the inherent contradiction of the current situation. We got into this mess because people borrowed and spent beyond their means. It is a good thing for people to be more careful in the future. But, if they don’t start spending soon, the economy will go into a tailspin. So, what makes sense for any given individual, curtailing spending and paying down debt, is disastrous for the country as a whole. Obama denied the premise of Todd’s question, and used it to talk about the systemic problems the country faces. It was artfully done.

Throughout the hour, Obama displayed a mastery of the facts of every question. His replies were lucid and exhaustive. The first two questions and answers consumed a full thirteen minutes. The president is not given to short, pithy answers.

President Obama had two audiences yesterday, the public and the Congress. By warning of the gravity of the situation, he hopes to garner enough votes to pass the stimulus bill even though he did not seem stressed about the particulars. He wants the public to see that their government will not leave them to fate nor to the impersonal laws of the market, still less to a continuation of the policies that led us into the crisis. Republican obstructionists must be careful. Even if their objections to the stimulus are correct on the merits and popular with swing voters, they are only getting airtime on cable news. The President last night commanded all the airwaves. The bully pulpit is back, even though the current bully is more professor than playground tyrant.

 

 

Comments are automatically closed two weeks after an article's initial publication. See our comments policy for more.
9 years 8 months ago
Mr. Winters: What an unfortunate ending to your fine commentary: ''The bully pulpit is back, even though the current bully is more professor than playground tyrant.'' One has to wonder who and why ''playground tyrant'' is in there. Does it refer to President Bush? I would recommend that you restrain your language in the interest of communicating rather than offending. We need consensus on the national crisis rather than partisan attacks.
9 years 8 months ago
Two things I've never understood: (1) Why is it ''disastrous for the country as a whole'' for individuals to pay off debt? I understand why saving doesn't stimulate the economy, but considering that we're sending billions directly to the banks, what harm is there to redirecting a small fraction of that bailout through debtors? It still ends up with the banks, hopefully doing something to free up credit, but it has simultaneously helped an individual or family stay above water. (2) Allowing that it is ineffective in the macro sense for individuals to save money and assuming for the moment that it's ineffective for them to pay down debt, why doesn't the stimulus package include for every taxpayer (or the bottom 95% or some other fraction) the equivalent of a Visa gift card, that is, a card with say $500 or $1000 on it that can *only* be spent at stores on consumer goods and cannot be deposited in a savings account? New studies suggest that rebates actually do work, but it seems to me they could work even better if we weren't given a choice as to whether to spend or save. Last year, my $1000 rebate was directly deposited in my bank account, making it even more difficult to overcome thrifty inertia and spend it.

Advertisement

The latest from america

While recommitting to help, L.I.R.S. and the U.S. bishops called on the Trump administration to “commit to immigration policies that are humane and uphold each individual’s human dignity.”
J.D. Long-GarcíaOctober 17, 2018
Caroline McClain, 16, sits on the ruins of her family's Mexico Beach vacation home after Hurricane Michael. Photo by Atena Sherry.
Human-driven climate change is intensifying tropical cyclones across the globe, climatologists say, but the role it played in the tragedy at Mexico Beach is both subtle and surprising.
Mario ArizaOctober 17, 2018
Our faith tells us that Christ chose to suffer on our behalf and that when we choose to do the same, in the service of others, we imitate Jesus in our own lives.
Terrance KleinOctober 17, 2018
Let’s begin to enlist both left and right in service of the vulnerable—using the ideological language they already accept.
Simcha FisherOctober 17, 2018