Obama Needs Smart Economists & Humility

 

Advertisement

The President had a good day yesterday, beating back some of the more ridiculous claims made about the health care reform plans making their way through Congress. It must be a bizarre feeling to be in charge of a large and effective White House press office, with as much access to the media as you want, in the twenty-first century no less, and find yourself having to explain that the proposals do not, in fact, call for death panels. One youngster outside the rally held a sign "Obama Lies! Grandma Dies!" which reflected poorly on the child's parents. She was not far from the man who showed up with a gun and a sign that read "Time to water the Tree of Liberty." So, the calm, measured explanations of the President benefited from comparison to say the least.

Still, there was in the President's manner and tone a hint of condescension. I am sure the moment was rich. And, I am sure the temptation is great when the charges are so wild and the facts of the legislation so pedestrian. But, that hint of condescension nearly brought down Obama's presidential campaign last April when he spoke, or misspoke, about rural citizens who "cling to religion or guns or antipathy to people who aren't like them" when faced with economic hardships. The comment did not go over well with voters in the upcoming primary in Pennsylvania which, as James Carville once observed, has Philadelphia at one end and Pittsburgh at the other and a whole lot of Alabama in between.

Now, let's be honest. President Obama probably is much smarter than any three other people you know. He did not get to his high office by luck or chance. He has an uncommon measure of effectiveness, determination, focus, raw intelligence and people skills. In other words, in most of the ways our culture measures human successfulness, Obama probably is looking down at the rest of us. Our democracy, however, does not recognize such distinctions and lucky for candidate Obama that enough gun-clingers in Pennsylvania voted for him that he won the nomination and then the presidency.

This would all be academic banter were it not for the headline in this morning's Post "A Recovery Only A Statistician Can Love." The quote is from senior economist Mark Vitner at Wells Fargo and it illustrates what I predict will be the central challenge of the Obama White House in the coming months. The fundamentals of the economy may indeed be turning around and the companies that emerge from the recession may be more productive and more efficient, but in the world of politics, you can't call it a recovery until people start getting hired and wages start going up. This will be frustrating because the very smart economists who work in the White House and at the Treasury Department will be able to see the good news in the numbers that will remain opaque to the rest of us.

President Obama's economic team is brilliant and we want brilliant people working on fixing the nation's economy. But, Tim Geithner has pretty good job prospects when he leaves the Treasury Department and Larry Summers one experience of job insecurity had nothing to do with the economy and everything to do with the most inside of inside politics, Harvard's faculty turf wars. These advisors will reassure the President that no more action is needed when the economy starts to expand significantly but he will be out on the hustings hearing tales of woe. The disconnect in America between the upper classes and the rest of us has never been greater and the President must be very, very careful not to show so much as a hint of frustration with those who cannot, like his economics team, see the good news in the numbers yet. Whatever else he does or doesn't do, President Obama should speak every day with someone who has lost their job, someone who lacks health insurance, someone who had to drop out of school because they can't afford it. People who are out of work may not be able to read the economic tea leaves. And they may or may not not be very articulate about their circumstances. But, they are the people whose votes gave the Mr. Obama the opportunity to lead the country and to select the best and smartest advisors he could find. Now, in addition to clinging to our guns and our religion, we are clinging to him and to the hopes he has raised. A slow, anemic economic recovery may not help the President's favorability rating, but a hint of condescension will kill it.

 

Comments are automatically closed two weeks after an article's initial publication. See our comments policy for more.
8 years 9 months ago
Or it could be that the numbers of the "brilliant" are all bells and whistles, that Geithner was a very poor choice, no matter what his academic credentials are, and perhaps the president is getting bad advice. Agreement that jobs are the real barometer of a healthy economy. I don't think we can keep going with optimism on the economy with practical unemployment in the mid-teens.
There are a lot of brilliant people in economics these days. I suppose I'd prefer someone with one or two less brain cells than Geithner and a bit more in the wisdom department.
8 years 9 months ago
I really don't see the claim that Obama is super-smart. Why does anyone say that? He speaks in platitudes. He makes weird claims, and is constantly spouting off about things he obviously doesn't understand.
I'm sorry, MSW. If he's so smart:
1) Why is he constantly saying incorrect things
2) Why can't he speak in specifics
3) Why can't he engage in the particulars of issues instead of hurling ad hominems - instead of saying, ''that's a rumor, that's misinformation'' - why can't he point to specifics in the bill and rationally explain why this or that claim is incorrect?
3) Why is his administration in free-fall? If he's such a genius, why can't he pick better people?

Advertisement

Don't miss the best from America

Sign up for our Newsletter to get the Jesuit perspective on news, faith and culture.

The latest from america

The news from Ireland and the United States reminds us of Herod, of Pharaoh. What culture betrays its children?
The EditorsMay 26, 2018
A woman religious casts her ballot May 25 in Dublin as Ireland holds a referendum on its law on abortion. Voters went to the polls May 25 to decide whether to liberalize the country's abortion laws. (CNS photo/Alex Fraser, Reuters)
The repeal of Ireland's Eighth Amendment, which guarantees the right to life of the unborn, is passing by a 2-1 margin with most of the votes counted.
Education Secretary Betsy DeVos testifies at a House Committee on Education and the Workforce, Tuesday, May 22, 2018, on Capitol Hill in Washington. (AP Photo/Jacquelyn Martin)
The Secretary of Education stirred up controversy when she said it was up to schools to decide if an undocumented student should be reported to authorities.
J.D. Long-GarcíaMay 25, 2018
Thousands gathered in Dublin May 12 to say "Love Both" and "Vote No" to abortion on demand. They were protesting abortion on demand in the forthcoming referendum May 25. (CNS photo/John McElroy)
“Priests and bishops get verbal abuse by being told, ‘How can you speak for women? You don’t know what it’s like!’”
America StaffMay 25, 2018