NRLC Scoring Vote on Stupak Amendment

The National Right-To-Life Committee has sent a letter to all members of Congress urging them to vote for the Stupak Amendment which will ban all federal funding for abortion coverage. The key section in the letter reads: “As NRLC’s congressional scorecard for the 111th Congress will clearly explain, a vote against the Stupak-Pitts Amendment can only be construed as a position-defining vote in favor of establishing a federal government program that will directly fund abortion on demand, with federal funds, and a second federal program that will provide government subsidies to private insurance plans that cover abortion on demand.  NRLC regards this as the most important House roll call on federal funding of abortion since the House last voted directly on the Hyde Amendment in 1997.  If you do not wish to go on record in support of creating major new federal programs that will both fund abortions directly and subsidize private abortion coverage, please vote for the Stupak-Pitts Amendment.  NRLC will regard a ‘present’ vote as equivalent to a negative vote on the Stupak-Pitts Amendment.”

To be clear, this will be a “scored vote” by NRLC. So, as Republicans try and frustrate the eventual health care bill, they should be very careful not to think that voting against Stupak to make the final bill toxic will work. NRLC has laid down a marker and pro-life members on both sides of the aisle should not turn our concern for human dignity into a bargaining strategy. Politics is not for the naive and the halls of Congress are often an invitation to cynicism. But, not where human life is concerned.

Advertisement

 

Comments are automatically closed two weeks after an article's initial publication. See our comments policy for more.
Think Catholic
8 years 3 months ago
Let's put to rest the idea that pro-life groups would ever consider it legitimate to give Republicans a pass for putting unborn babies on the railroad track in hopes that the train would stop.  And the fact is, the Republicans did not play that heinous game after all, did they?  Do they deserve perhaps an apology from those who quickly jumped to the conclusion that they would do it? 

Advertisement

Don't miss the best from America

Sign up for our Newsletter to get the Jesuit perspective on news, faith and culture.

The latest from america

When I played hockey, other players of color were few and far between.
Antonio De Loera-BrustFebruary 20, 2018
Five years later, looking back on a momentous day in the life of the church
James Martin, SJFebruary 18, 2018
If you know nothing else about Lent, you probably know that people give things up.
James Martin, SJFebruary 18, 2018