Mea Culpa to Cardinal George

Cardinal Francis George of Chicago clarified his previous remarks about the decision by the University of Notre Dame to invite President Obama to deliver this year’s commencement address. He said his remarks were taken out of context. Here is a link to a video of his comments that was posted by the archdiocese.

As one of those who rushed to judgment based on news reports of the original remarks, I owe the cardinal an apology and will put one in the mail to him later this morning. Rushing to judgment is something of an occupational hazard for a blogger but I should have given Cardinal George the benefit of the doubt. His two doctoral dissertations, both of which I have read, are evidence of a profound and incisive mind. We collaborated a few years back on a symposium at the University of Chicago on my friend Leon Wieseltier’s book "Kaddish." The cardinal’s commentary was brilliant and his generosity in sharing so much time on a subject somewhat far afield from his daily official duties was notable. In short, I knew better than to believe that Cardinal George had fallen in with those on the right who have been calling for all manner of sanctions against Notre Dame and uttered all manner of distasteful and ugly diatribe against the President of the United States.


On this last point, Cardinal George’s statement clarifying his position leaves no room for misunderstanding: "No one questions the good faith of the president of the university nor of the President of the United States." As a statement of fact, that is quite wrong. I would argue this whole kerfuffle is the result of people questioning, viciously, the good faith of the both presidents. But, in clearly and unequivocally refusing to be associated with those who so question the good faith of Father Jenkins and President Obama, Cardinal George has demonstrated ably the lesson many of us hoped we could find in this controversy, namely, that we Catholics may disagree about politics but we must do so respectfully and charitably. Now, we bloggers have to be at least a little edgy or we would be boring. But, this blogger should have shown more patience and allowed the Cardinal to clarify his remarks before I denounced them. Confiteor Deo omnipotenti, et vobis fraters….



Comments are automatically closed two weeks after an article's initial publication. See our comments policy for more.
9 years 6 months ago
It is good of you to apologize. However, the Cardinal himself is to blame for fueling the diatribes and it is disingenuous of him to deny that he did not encourage people to protest. He explicitly told his audience that since the Bishops don't have formal jurisdiction over Notre Dame that it was up to lay people to carry the protest message back to the University. In addition, despite his protestations, he has also explicitly called into question the good faith of Fr. Jenkins and Notre Dame by accusing them of a lack of understanding of what it means to be Catholic. And by encouraging the view that President Obama is solely interested in suing an invitation to speak at Notre Dame to promulgate his pro-choice and anti-Catholic message he has succeeded in questioning, and disrespecting, the President’s good faith. Make no mistake, the Cardinal has consciously put himself at the center of this and is now trying to weasel out, like he has done on other issues in the past. You were not so off base as you seem to think.


The latest from america

 10.17.2018 Pope Francis greets Cardinal Blase J. Cupich of Chicago before a session of the Synod of Bishops on young people, the faith and vocational discernment at the Vatican Oct. 16. (CNS photo/Vatican Media)
“We take people where they are, walking with them, moving forward,” Cardinal Blase Cupich said.
Michael J. O’LoughlinOctober 20, 2018
Catherine Pakaluk, who currently teaches at the Catholic University of America and holds a Ph.D. in Economics from Harvard University, describes her tweet to Mr. Macron as “spirited” and “playful.”
Emma Winters October 19, 2018
A new proposal from the Department of Homeland Security could make it much more difficult for legal immigrants to get green cards in the United States. But even before its implementation, the proposal has led immigrants to avoid receiving public benefits.
J.D. Long-GarcíaOctober 19, 2018
 Archbishop Carlo Maria Vigano, then nuncio to the United States, and then-Cardinal Theodore E. McCarrick of Washington, are seen in a combination photo during the beatification Mass of Blessed Miriam Teresa Demjanovich at the Cathedral Basilica of the Sacred Heart in Newark, N.J., Oct. 4, 2014. (CNS photo/Gregory A. Shemitz)
In this third letter Archbishop Viganò no longer insists, as he did so forcefully in his first letter, that the restrictions that he claimed Benedict XVI had imposed on Archbishop McCarrick—one he alleges that Pope Francis later lifted—can be understood as “sanctions.”
Gerard O’ConnellOctober 19, 2018