Making Sense of the Murder at the Holocaust Museum

The family of Steven Johns, the security guard at the Holocaust museum who was killed by a fanatic anti-Semite and racist on Wednesday, deserves a thorough investigation into their beloved’s murder. So does the family of Dr. George Tiller, killed by a fanatic anti-abortion activist two weeks ago. In both cases, it is pretty clear what motivated the killers, a pure hatred, and in both cases, pundits are trying to see the murders as part of a wider political reality. They must tread carefully however.

Michael Gerson this morning writes about the virulent anti-Semitic mail he got after a column he posted on Holocaust denial that came out, coincidentally, the day that Johns was shot. He seems surprised by the virulence of those who see Jewish conspiracies everywhere and who continue to doubt the Holocaust happened. He notes that the Internet "allows these obsessions to gather in fetid pools….The Internet has helped to create communities of malice." True enough, but anti-Semitism existed and thrived before Guttenberg’s printing press too.


The danger the Internet poses is the ease with which one community of haters, say, anti-Semites, can connect with another group of haters, say, racists. Hitler, of course, hated both Jews and blacks and Mr. von Brunn evidently did also. Mr. von Brunn also had some loopy thoughts about the Federal Reserve, where he was arrested after trying to make a citizens’ arrest of the Fed’s Board. We do not know how von Brunn came by his hatreds, but it is undoubtedly true that the Internet facilitates the gathering of information, true or false, benign or malignant, and of connecting people with similar interests.

Gerson asks, "Why the Jews?" I confess I was surprised in 2004 when, working on a campaign for a Democratic candidate, I encountered the anti-Semitism of the Left. It emerged usually out of a critique of the Iraq War and seeing that war as the fault of neo-conservatives, many of whom are Jewish. You would be listening to a person give a perfectly cogent and permissible criticism of U.S. policy and all of a sudden, you would hear, "But, the Jews…." Not, "But, Israel…." although sometimes that was where it started. Not all criticisms of Israel are made by anti-Semites, of course, but all critics of Israel have an obligation to be mindful of their intellectual surroundings.

I had been raised in a traditional liberal family that was pro-union, pro-health care and pro-Israel. I associated anti-Semitism in this country with Joe McCarthy and Father Coughlin and abroad I saw it tied in with the Lefebvrists and their ancestors, who instigated the Dreyfuss Affair and attacked Pope Leo XIII for his failure to see that Jews were behind the Third Republic. On a visit to Poland to meet relatives, I encountered the still prevalent anti-Semitism in the land of my forefathers, a land that hosted the largest crematoria.

Gerson quotes Sara Bloomfield, the director of the Holocaust Museum: "Anti-Semitism has existed with and without Christianity. With and without the right wing. With and without the left wing. With and without democracy. With and without economic problems. With and without globalization. With and without a Jewish homeland."

For those who seek to lay the murder of Mr. Johns at the feet of conservative political movements, these words of Ms. Bloomfield should give pause. For those who seek to lay the blame for the murder of Dr. Tiller at the feet of those who use inflammatory rhetoric, these words should give them pause. We must resist and condemn hateful speech because it is hateful, not because it will necessarily lead an unbalanced person to get their gun. Were Dr. Tiller and Mr. Johns still walking the earth, it would still be wrong to indulge anti-Semitic hatreds or to de-humanize those who disagree with us on abortion.

And, for those who blame Israel and its policies for giving rise to anti-Semitism, remember that pogrom is not an Arab word and that Edgardo Mortara was kidnapped by a Pope not a Palestinian.


Comments are automatically closed two weeks after an article's initial publication. See our comments policy for more.
8 years 7 months ago
Both this article and the one Gerson wrote declare that we need to ''condemn'' racist speech. That's absolutely 100% true, no doubt, but racism and violence as a result of it will still continue, no matter how many people or programs attempt to stop it. This is  an issue of human nature, to blame political or social problems on a minority group that has throughout history been looked at as  ''inferior'', whether African-American or Jewish. And, unfortunately as a result of this, there are many problems within the social and cultural realms of some minorities. What we need to do is learn to focus on these particular urgent problems now, rather than exhausting all our resources on trying to eradicate racism and bigotry completely. By adressing those problems, we will be doing much more to lessen this kind of prejudice than simply ''condemning'' it.
8 years 7 months ago
As one who grew up in a neighborhood with a large Jewish population (and some of those tell-tale wrist tattoos) I have been appalled to find a significant and threatening degree of anti-semitism among my co-religionists who describe themselves as ''traditionalists.''  Unfortunately, I have also been equally appalled that no one addresses this from the pulpit.  The re-acceptance of the SSPX has in some circles only emboldened the haters.  ''We must resist and condemn hateful speech because it is hateful.''  How very true.


Don't miss the best from America

Sign up for our Newsletter to get the Jesuit perspective on news, faith and culture.

The latest from america

A boy presents a hat to Pope Francis upon his arrival at the international airport in Trujillo, Peru, Jan. 20. (CNS photo/Paul Haring)
“Just as the apostles faced the storm on the sea, you had to face the brunt of ‘El Niño costero.’”
Gerard O’ConnellJanuary 20, 2018
Pope Francis greets the crowd before celebrating Mass at the Maquehue Airport near Temuco, Chile, Jan. 17. (CNS photo/Paul Haring)
“Pope Francis’ statements...were a source of great pain for survivors of sexual abuse,” Cardinal O’Malley said in a statement released Jan. 20.
Michael J. O’LoughlinJanuary 20, 2018
 Pope Francis and Peruvian President Pedro Pablo Kuczynski stand outside the presidential palace in Lima, Peru, Jan.19.(CNS photo//Mariana Bazo, Reuters)
“The degradation of the environment...cannot be separated from the moral degradation of our communities.”
Gerard O’ConnellJanuary 20, 2018
The U.S. bishops had an unusually busy year issuing positive and negative statements about the new president, but some hoped for more decisive action against his policies.
Michael J. O’LoughlinJanuary 19, 2018