Judging the Bush Years: Katrina

President Bush’s press conference the day was galling in many ways: The man’s inability to admit a mistake was stunning. Hell, I’ve made plenty of mistakes in the past eight years. How about you? But nothing was more pathetic than his truculence regarding the federal response to the levee breaks after Hurricane Katrina. The issue is one that requires careful, precise but forceful moral analysis.

The tragedy that befell New Orleans was not, strictly speaking, a natural disaster. The failures were man-made. Hurricane Katrina did not destroy New Orleans. The failure of federally built and federally managed levees flooded New Orleans. Concerns about the levees had been ignored and the Army Corps of Engineers had its hands full trying to rebuild Baghdad, yet another evil consequence of an unnecessary war.


Nor is it possible for the federal government to shift the blame. Blaming the Mayor of New Orleans or the Governor of Louisiana for the failure to respond to the catastrophe overlooks the fact that all the resources with which both city and state could respond were themselves overwhelmed by the catastrophe. New Orleans and Louisiana needed help to be brought in from the outside.

Katrina was the moment when the American people learned they could not believe President Bush and his administration. There had been debates about how the war in Iraq was progressing, but who knew how to assess the administration’s claims? But, in the aftermath of Katrina Americans saw Bush-style denial in ways they could grasp. I remember listening to Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff in an interview on NPR. "All Things Considered" had led off with a report by Robert Burnett from the Convention Center where its reporter on the ground said there was no food, no water and no law at that location. Chertoff’s interview followed and he told host Robert Seigel "You know, the one thing about an episode like this is if you talk to someone and you get a rumor or you get someone’s anecdotal version of something, I think it’s dangerous to extrapolate it all over the place..."I had never heard an NPR host blow his lid, but Seigel did, informing Chertoff in no uncertain terms that the report they had just aired was from Burnett, a veteran reporter with ample experience in war zones. These were not rumors. American citizens were dying where their government had sent them to seek refuge and the man charged with protecting them refused to admit there was even a problem. Bush was never believable again.

I have never been a fan of Bush but I also never found myself hating him the way some of my confreres on the Left seemed to hate him. But, in the weeks and months after the failure to respond to the flooding of New Orleans, I found myself pulling up alongside cars still sporting a Bush bumper sticker, rolling down my window, and asking sarcastically, "Still happy with Bush?"

It is small comfort that Bush’s approval ratings began their downward spiral in the days and weeks after the levees broke. And, it is even less comfort that three years after Bush promised to rebuild New Orleans, the Crescent City remains half of her former self and this fact will do more than anything to color Bush’s standing before history.

Yet, Bush seemed completely unfazed as he sought to defend his record. It was worse than standard denial. It was delusional. That, alas, is the principal legacy of George W. Bush: an administration record of delusion and denial, of ideological conformity and ideological extremism. Herbert Hoover will soon have company in the catalogue of failed presidencies.

Comments are automatically closed two weeks after an article's initial publication. See our comments policy for more.
9 years 1 month ago
Delusion and denial at the highest levels of government are the result of a growing tendency everywhere to avoid taking responsibility for one's actions. The sad part is that Mr Bush's refusal to take responsibility intersected with the failures of local and state government (and those were certianly there) to plan and act; the result was the catastrophe that Katrina visited upon New Orleans. The storm would have caused great damage in any case...the failures of government at every level compounded the damage. One hopes that those who will replace those who failed us have learned the lessons and will be willing to step up to their responsibilities.
9 years 1 month ago
Hurricane Katrina is also when I lost all hope in the Bush administration. When he gave his ''Axis of Evil'' speech, I could forgive him for unwisely giving into his passions. When he started the war in Iraq, I could forgive him for being misled. When he failed to provide adequate equipment to our troops in order to cut taxes, I could blame it on his advisors. When I learned about our policy of torturing prisoners, I went into denial. But with Hurrican Katrina, there was nowhere else to go. I finally came to understand that he is either grossly incompetent or that, simply, ''the truth is not in him.'' And then I knew the answer when his mouthpieces in the media began to blame the poor, drowning, dying people of New Orleans for not getting out like they should have. I started the process of becoming Catholic at exactly the time of Hurricane Katrina. I am Catholic because I believe that God calls us to live in the truth both as individuals and as a real, tangible community of believing, faithful people. There is a very clear Catholic response to every example I listed above (and the Pope gave several), yet the Bush administration has, in every case, done the opposite. I cannot understand how so many Catholics continue to be deceived by those who talk piously yet do such evil.
9 years 1 month ago
I'm not at all happy about the incoming administration, but I'm happy as hell to see the outgoing one leave.


Don't miss the best from America

Sign up for our Newsletter to get the Jesuit perspective on news, faith and culture.

The latest from america

Pope Francis has appointed 16 members (eight men and eight women) to the Pontifical Commission for the Protection of Minors.
Gerard O’ConnellFebruary 17, 2018
This time the victims themselves are not having it. From the moment the first shots rang out, they captured the horror and broadcast it, forced the nation to confront it and talk about it.
Kevin ClarkeFebruary 16, 2018

Given the moment we are in, you might think a lot of shows on television would be trying to talk about current events or “America” in some way. But in point of fact, there aren’t that many. And even fewer are doing it well.

Jim McDermottFebruary 16, 2018
A conversation with Liel Leibovitz and Stephanie Butnick on faith, fasting and podcasting
Olga SeguraFebruary 16, 2018