Iran's Election & Our Myopia

An event like the Iranian elections shows just how myopic American media and news agencies have become. With financial conditions requiring most news agencies to abandon the extensive foreign desks they once had, our ability to know what is going on, let alone to make sense of it, is dwindling fast.

Coverage leading up to the election focused almost entirely on the international ramifications of the election. The reformer Mir Hossein Mousavi was portrayed as the candidate willing to put President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad’s embarrassing Holocaust denials and other rants in the past. Of course, you have to be careful when talking about "reformers" in the Iranian Islamic Republic: I recall an earlier reformer who had gotten his start in politics organizing unarmed teenagers to undertake martyrdom during the Iran-Iraq War by walking across minefields and blowing themselves up so that the soldiers could follow.


Sometimes, foreign policy issues truly are predominant in an election. The 1920 repudiation of the Democrats was really an endorsement of isolationism. FDR overcame the two-term limit on presidencies largely because of the dangerous world situation. In 1960, Richard Nixon and John Kennedy spent more time in their debates discussing Quemoy and the Matsu Islands than they did any domestic issue. But, most recent elections have been waged on domestic grounds. Even the objection to George Bush’s post-9/11 actions had as much to do with the Patriot Act and warrantless wire-tapping as with the Iraq War. Yet, we know next to nothing about the economy in Iran, the government budget and any cuts or expansions in programs for the poor or middle class that might or might not be popular, any environmental issues, or even that perennial concern of many voters, the filling of potholes in the roads. Ahmadinejad may be bonkers, but if he makes the trains run on time, he might be more popular than we were led to believe.

Now, with the surprise official results showing the incumbent winning by a landslide, we are left to wonder: Could it have happened? Or is this mere fraud? How to evaluate the charges and counter-charges being leveled? This is made all the more difficult because of the secrecy of the regime, its willingness to clamp down violently against protesters, and the murky role of the "Supreme Leader" and the Council of Guardians. A Western pollster says he thinks it is entirely likely that Ahmadinejad really did win by such a large margin based on his own polling, but I have to wonder how truthful Iranian citizens would risk being with a Western pollster?

So, the only thing we know for sure about Iran is that it is a mess today. That mess could get violent or it could dissipate in the days ahead. Maybe the current regime was so unpopular it had to steal an election and maybe it is more popular than we had anticipated for reasons opaque to us in the West. And, we know something else for sure: Forget about the major networks on this one. BBC is the place to go.

Comments are automatically closed two weeks after an article's initial publication. See our comments policy for more.
8 years 11 months ago
What's new? It's not US "media and news agencies" who are myopic: it is the US public, massively uneducated and incredibly insular. And that applies to US Catholics as well, totally absorbed by their petty concerns and parochial squabbles...
8 years 11 months ago
I'm both french, jew and arab, so I can tell you that US medias, like French medias are not myopic at all, but their audience is: Medias tells exactly what ''some people'' want them to say or spread, and uneducated and ignorant people believe them. If you think medias are myopic, then you are as well, because medias knows exactly what they say, we're in 2009, and they have learn a lot from past propagandas...


Don't miss the best from America

Sign up for our Newsletter to get the Jesuit perspective on news, faith and culture.

The latest from america

The news from Ireland and the United States reminds us of Herod, of Pharaoh. What culture betrays its children?
The EditorsMay 26, 2018
A woman religious casts her ballot May 25 in Dublin as Ireland holds a referendum on its law on abortion. Voters went to the polls May 25 to decide whether to liberalize the country's abortion laws. (CNS photo/Alex Fraser, Reuters)
The repeal of Ireland's Eighth Amendment, which guarantees the right to life of the unborn, is passing by a 2-1 margin with most of the votes counted.
Education Secretary Betsy DeVos testifies at a House Committee on Education and the Workforce, Tuesday, May 22, 2018, on Capitol Hill in Washington. (AP Photo/Jacquelyn Martin)
The Secretary of Education stirred up controversy when she said it was up to schools to decide if an undocumented student should be reported to authorities.
J.D. Long-GarcíaMay 25, 2018
Thousands gathered in Dublin May 12 to say "Love Both" and "Vote No" to abortion on demand. They were protesting abortion on demand in the forthcoming referendum May 25. (CNS photo/John McElroy)
“Priests and bishops get verbal abuse by being told, ‘How can you speak for women? You don’t know what it’s like!’”
America StaffMay 25, 2018