How to Evaluate A Professor

This post is part of an occasional series on "How To Succeed in College." Click on the author's name above for previous posts.

Perhaps the most controversial issue in education today is teacher evaluation and its relation to compensation. Should the “better” teachers” be paid more? And how do we know whether one teacher is better than another? The standard answer is that the students of the best teachers will score highest on the standard tests. There are, I believe, at least two problems with this idea. First, certain teachers are often assigned the “best” classes—honors students, and English majors. Those will do well on the finals no matter who teaches them. Second, rewarding high test scores requires the professor to “teach to the test,” give practice exams rather than reading homework—in short display the talents of a drill sergeant rather than an intellectual.

Evaluating college teachers is more complex. What I say now is based on three years teaching in a Jesuit high school and 42 in five Jesuit colleges and universities, two of which as dean, plus teaching at  three secular universities. At nearly all these places, professors are evaluated for promotion, merit pay and tenure on the basis of teaching, scholarship and service. The college with the best procedures, Holy Cross, required all the evaluating committee members to write the reasons for their decision, to be given to the faculty member, and sign it. It had to be strong enough to stand up in court and the committee had to take public responsibility for their decision. No one was promoted who did not publish. A scholar has the obligation to contribute to the shared knowledge in his/her field, and, at the same time demonstrate mastery, through publication, of what he/she is delivering in class.

As an evaluation tool, the end-of-semester teacher evaluation forms filled out in class are the most controversial and least satisfactory instrument. To prepare for a book on Generation X, one author taught for a year in a community college in order to get more experience with his subject. In the first semester he started out with high standards: reading assignments and short papers for every class, regular quizzes, a research paper, class discussions and a tough final. The students took their revenge on the evaluation forms. In the second semester, to test his theory, he capitulated—didn’t take attendance, gave little homework and high grades—and they loved him. He was now a “good” teacher because he didn’t push.

Anonymous teaching forms also teach students that they can smear a teacher and get away with it. Only a few questionnaires may be that bad,  but those are the ones the teacher remembers. A better system would be to select a cross section of the class and invite them to write  signed letters to the dean  which will be shared with the teacher. The quality of the letter would be evidence of the writer’s credibility. The dean and fellow faculty should visit every class during the semester and write evaluations. And, most important,  the dean should scrutinize the syllabus to measure the standards by the reading list, number of papers, and attendance requirements.

If I had a million dollars I would set up a fund to reward challenging and imaginative teaching. In an English course, for example, the syllabus would have to include at  least one Big Fat Book—David Copperfield, Brothers Karamozov, Les Miserables, or Count of Monte Cristo—plus three or four other novels and short stories. To make sure they were reading, give a quick quiz and either a discussion outline or one-page essay, every day. In the 1970s at Fordham we read a book a week. Today the same should be possible if the overall intellectual culture of the school supported high standards. The grant would include money to take the class to an opera or symphony, and dinner. At the end all the students would read one another’s final papers and critique them in class.

Of course, seeing the workload, maybe no one would want to take the course. If so, the school has another problem.


Raymond A. Schroth, S.J.


Comments are automatically closed two weeks after an article's initial publication. See our comments policy for more.
Vince Killoran
7 years 12 months ago
A very good topic.  The CHRONICLE OF HIGHER EDUCATION published an article about student evaluations of faculty teaching.  The best evaluations ask students to reflect on their objectives in taking a course and then explain how the instructor helped them meet the objectives.  The benefit with this kind of evaluation is that it's more difficult to rush through the form, it's not a popularity contest, and the limits of what students can say about quality of teaching are apparent.
Julio Vidaurrazaga
7 years 12 months ago
A very good point: As a professor I have verified  the facts many times.
   The article deserves a biggest audience than the (excelet) blog of "America"
 Also people in mathematics & Science like me know that many students feel
FORCED to take courses that they do not care,  do not see the point , there are
just obstacles to thei professional  goal ... Why should I take calculus and physics
if in want to be an engineer ?(SIC)
Crystal Watson
7 years 12 months ago
I think student evaluations of teachers are a good thing.  There are teachers, teachers with tenure who publish and who are in many ways untouchable unless they actually commit a crime, but who are pretty bad teachers - who's to make that clear if not their students?

I had all kinds of teachers in college, including one who let us do whatever we wanted (we played pool) and allowed us to give ourselves our grades (we all got As), but the teacher who I still revere was great because he gave great lectures, assigned great books, gave great advice outside of class (even invited us to his home), was kind, and helpful, and both good to us and a good example to us.
Crystal Watson
7 years 12 months ago

This reminds me of another post somewhere else in which lay people were going to give evaluations of their priests.  One of the priests commenting said that lay people evaluating priests was like customers at a restaurant evaluating their waitresses/waiters - that it didn't matter, more or less, what customers thought.   But while waitresses, priests, teachers may work for their bosses, their job duties are to serve, to help, to teach, to accompany, etc., and who is better able to evaluste how well they are fulfilling their function than those they are supposed to be helping?  I'm not saying student evalustions should be the only criteria for evalusting teachers, but if the only person a teacher thinks he's responsible to is his boss, then it's no surprise there are so many bad teachers (and students).
Mark Wonsil
7 years 12 months ago
There's an excellent TED talk by Salman Khan talking about how learning might change:

My wife is a professor at a Catholic university and she takes feedback very seriously. But even without tenure, there's still a lot of institutional momentum that prevents good teachers from being hired and poor ones from being removed.


The latest from america

Even in our relationships with family and friends, forgiveness can be hard to come by.
Pope Francis has accepted the resignation of Cardinal Ricardo Ezzati, the archbishop of Santiago, Chile, the Vatican announced on March 23.
Gerard O’ConnellMarch 23, 2019
Sister Bibiana Emenaha
A combination of a rapidly growing population, extreme poverty, unemployment and armed conflict push people to cross Nigeria’s porous borders in search of a better life.
Linus UnahMarch 22, 2019
As we come to grips with a national history of violence, greed and racialized privilege, this fable of noblesse oblige rings hollow.
Brandon SanchezMarch 22, 2019