How Catholics Are Confronting Climate Change This Week, With or Without the Bishops

Photo courtesy of People's Climate March

Paul Mayer, who succumbed to cancer last November, had a knack for noticing a moral crisis. He might have learned it from his German-Jewish parents, who whisked him from Frankfurt to New York just before Kristallnacht. He grew up to become a Catholic and a Benedictine priest, only to leave the cloister when he heard the call to march with Martin Luther King, Jr., at Selma. From there he organized against war in Vietnam, poverty in New Jersey’s slums and nuclear weapons around the world. But the final three chapters of his memoir, now informally circulating among friends, are about climate change.

“We must now fall in love with the earth again,” he prophesied, “and form the most powerful movement for social, political and cultural change in planetary history.” Nor was he alone in recognizing this; Popes Benedict and Francis have both denounced world leaders’ failure to confront the climate crisis. Francis is currently writing an encyclical on the topic.


Mayer would be proud to see what is happening this week. In advance of the Sept. 23 UN Climate Summit, people from across the globe are gathering in the streets of New York as part of what is being billed as “the largest climate march in history” on Sept. 21. (Don’t miss this film on its planning and rationale.) The organizers are making sure to emphasize the leadership of poor and vulnerable communities, which are often on the frontlines of the climate crisis, and which will be at the head of the march. The U.S. bishops expressed just this imperative in their landmark 2001 statement, which insisted, “Action to mitigate global climate change must be built upon a foundation of social and economic justice.”

Despite the bishops’ past clarity on climate justice and Pope Francis’ commitment to it, the Catholic hierarchy has been close to silent on this critical event. The march’s list of sponsors includes more than 1,000 labor unions, academic institutions, environmental groups and religious communities, but the Catholic Climate Covenant, the U.S.C.C.B.-affiliated “catalyst, convener and clearinghouse” on all things climate, is not one of them. “We as an organization decided early on not to participate in the march,” says Dan Misleh, C.C.C.’s executive director, citing resource limitations as well as concerns that some other sponsors might hold positions in tension with Catholic teaching.

Cardinal Timothy Dolan’s office, however, is reportedly sharing an announcement about the march with New York City parishes, and Dolan has posted on his blog, "It would be wonderful if there were a strong Catholic presence at the march, to indicate our prayerful support of God’s creation."

Catholics from as far as Florida and Argentina are coming to New York to do just that. Organizations with Catholic ties such as the Sisters of Mercy, the Sisters of St. Joseph, the Thomas Merton Center and Manhattanville College are on the list of sponsors, as is the Franciscan Action Network, which has been hosting weekly organizing calls for the past two months in preparation. “We expect to have a very large contingent of Catholics,” says Executive Director Patrick Carolan.

There will be a full schedule of activities for Catholics coming to New York this weekend—before, during and after the march.

  • Beginning on Sept. 19, Union Theological Seminary will host Religions for the Earth, a two-day conference featuring many leading scholars and activists working at the intersection of faith and the environment.
  • The New York Jesuits are hosting “An Ignatian Gathering on Climate Change” on Saturday evening, the eve of the march, at 5:30 p.m. at Xavier High School.
  • On the morning of Sept. 21, St. Columba Church is holding a special Mass for Catholic marchers at 9 a.m.
  • The faith contingent of the march will be assembling at 58th Street between Eighth and Ninth Avenues. A prayer service will begin at around 11 a.m., and faith groups are expected to start marching at around 12:30 p.m. The march to 34th Street should last several hours.
  • After the march, the Episcopal Cathedral of St. John the Divine will hold a multifaith service at 6 p.m.
  • As the business day begins on Monday, Sept. 22, marchers dressed in blue will “flood” the Financial District to call attention to the economic forces perpetuating climate change and undermining the world’s response to it. There will be speakers soon after at 9 a.m., followed by a mass sit-in beginning at around noon.
  • To debrief and discuss next steps, Franciscan Action Network is holding a panel discussion on “Caring for God’s Creation” at the church of St. Francis of Assisi on Sept. 22, starting at 7 p.m.

For more climate-related activities in the city this week, see the full list of events on the march website.

For those unable to come to New York, there are climate-related events taking place all over the world in support. Churches everywhere will be ringing their bells at 1 p.m. on Sept. 21. Catholics may also choose to join a petition created by, one of the main instigators of the march, calling on the Vatican to divest from the fossil-fuel industry.

The march organizers’ tendency for bombast notwithstanding, this one event will not “change everything.” But it is an opportunity to help create a turning point—to shift our culture’s values toward stewardship and reverence for creation, to exorcise the demonic urge to exploit the planet and the poor for the short-term benefit of a few. In concert with 2,000 years of tradition and the passionate witness of our pope, this is a vital moment to fill the streets for the sake of generations to come.

Comments are automatically closed two weeks after an article's initial publication. See our comments policy for more.
J Cabaniss
4 years 4 months ago
Pronouncements by the church on climate change are no more valid today than her pronouncements on the solar system were in the time of Galileo. This is a scientific question and it is still very much open. It is not a question of whether we should be good stewards of the Earth; it is a question of whether rising levels of atmospheric CO2 is a serious problem. We were assured that additional CO2 would persistently drive atmospheric temperatures higher, yet in the last 17-18 years, while CO2 has increased by 10%, atmospheric temperatures have not gone up at all. The possibility that such a "hiatus" in warming could occur was dismissed (95% confidence level) by virtually every model used by the IPCC. The explanation for the "missing" heat is that it has been taken up by the deep oceans, even though there are insufficient data to support the claim and nothing but conjecture about the mechanism for transferring the heat from the atmosphere to the deep blue sea. Is my understanding of the science involved flawed? Perhaps so, but the point is: this is a scientific debate, not a moral one, and the clergy should keep that in mind before trying to get out in front of a trendy issue.
Nathan Schneider
4 years 4 months ago

Thank you for sharing your response. The comparison with the time of Galileo is interesting, though in several ways it is misleading. Galileo's arguments were still a minority view in the scientific community at the time, and there were good reasons to consider them highly speculative, even if they eventually proved to be correct. (Among Galileo's key colleagues were priests, and the story of his conflict with the church is much more interesting than you allow.) Climate science, although also to some degree speculative in its complex models, also relies on significant evidence from records of past temperatures and carbon levels. The basic conclusion of human-influenced climate change is accepted by the leading scientific organizations with relevant expertise, as well as by government agencies that would have a vested interest in saying otherwise. The kind of "scientific debate" that you point to, in contrast, is mainly a concoction of organizations that are directly funded by the fossil fuel industry. This is a very different situation indeed from that of Galileo, and the church is correct to recognize that.

Regardless, I think your initial premise — ruling out the question of our stewardship of the earth — is most troubling of all. Human responsibility for stewardship of the earth goes back to the first chapter of Genesis in our tradition, and it has been articulated in our theology in many ways ever since. To believe in a creator God enjoins us to listen to the voice of creation, including its cries. We live in a moment of rapid industrial growth, of mass extinction, of unprecedented genetic manipulation. In many, many ways, humans are shirking the responsibility of stewardship, and Christians have every reason to join the struggle to reclaim it.

Susan Wilcox
4 years 4 months ago
I echo Cardinal Dolan's sentiments, "It would be wonderful if there were a strong Catholic presence at the march, to indicate our prayerful support of God’s creation." And if after the march, we kept on praying, talking, organizing and acting on behalf of the planet and future generations.
Richard Savage
4 years 3 months ago
"The kind of "scientific debate" that you point to, in contrast, is mainly a concoction of organizations that are directly funded by the fossil fuel industry. This is a very different situation indeed from that of Galileo, and the church is correct to recognize that." I usually wait 24 hours before posting a response to the idiotic articles I see in AmericaMag about climate change. Your response to the comment by Mr. Cabaniss delayed me for a week. Apparently your only defense of your ignorant claims is to denigrate those who disagree with you - based on scientific fact, not on bribes from the fossil fuel industry. Very sad that AmericaMag lowers itself to your level. I note you have no scientific expertise, evidenced by an academic degree. The marchers were overwhelmingly socialists, whose message was: Capitalism is the Disease/Climate Change is the Symptom/Socialism is the Cure. Socialism has never been good for humans and, as exemplified by the Soviet Union, has been terrible for the environment. Why don't you and the ignoramuses - including some bishops - who agree with you go and learn about the Scientific Method? Galileo was one of its pioneers. One of its principles is that experiment determines the truth or falsehood of an hypothesis. The global change hypothesis - its only hypothesis - is that atmospheric carbon dioxide controls the climate. There has been no global warming for 18 years. Experiment OVER! Hypothesis KAPUT! Richard C. Savage Ph.D., Meteorology


The latest from america

Native American protestors hold hands with parishioner Nathanial Hall, right, during a group prayer outside the Catholic Diocese of Covington on Jan. 22, 2019, in Covington, Ky. (AP Photo/John Minchillo)
The furor over a chance meeting between Catholic high school students and Native American protesters underscores the need to listen and learn from indigenous voices.
Marlene LangJanuary 23, 2019
The staggering parliamentary defeat for Prime Minister Theresa May, seen here leaving 10 Downing Street on Jan. 23, pushed the country even further from safe dry land. (AP Photo/Alastair Grant)
After the stunning defeat of Theresa May's exit deal, Scotland is looking anew at independence, and the U.K. government fears economic disaster.
David StewartJanuary 23, 2019
Michael Osborne, a film director, documents the damage from a mud slide next to his home in Los Angeles on Jan. 18, after three days of heavy rain. (AP Photo/Damian Dovarganes)
The conceit of California-as-disaster-movie is ridiculous. But maybe watching our fires and mudslides helps other states consider both their own fragility and their underlying strength.
Jim McDermottJanuary 23, 2019
A commitment to religious liberty demands that effort be devoted to resolving, rather than exacerbating, any real or apparent tension between religious obligation and civil duty.
The EditorsJanuary 23, 2019