In this week’s New Yorker, columnist Michael Kinsley describes what he calls the last competition of his aging boomer generation, i.e. who can live longest and die the best death, {Read "Mine Is Longer Than Yours".) You win if you can live longer than your peers and stay in good enough health to remain a player in career and family life. When death can no longer be staved off by modern medicine the best death is the quickest and most painless, providing just enough time to tidy up your affairs. Kinsley is an ironic cultural observer, as well as brutally honest about his own struggle to stay alive and in the game despite Parkinson’s disease. His discussion is also quite faith free; there is no mention of spirituality, or God, or any life hereafter. I note the chilly religious void in its complete contrast with the depictions of a good death in historian Drew Gilpin Faust’s new book, "This Republic Of Suffering: Death And The American Civil War." She analyzes in detail the accepted conditions for a good death held by northern and southern soldiers and their families. Ideally, the dying person should be conscious of their fate, be willing to accept it, give signs of belief in God and their own salvation and be able to leave messages and exhortations for those left behind. Christian fortitude, hope and resignation set the standard for dying well. Facing death does appear to clarify the mind in every generation. So what do we come up with in our own case? Sidney Callahan
A Good Death?
Show Comments ()
1
Comments are automatically closed two weeks after an article's initial publication. See our comments policy for more.
17 years 1 month ago
While I am sympathetic to Kinsley's medical condition, I am bothered by his self-centered view of life and death, and by the "chilly religious void" in his article. Kinsley may be an "ironic cultural observer" in some respects, but I didn't find much in the way of irony in this article. Perhaps that was because I read the article with awareness of his atheism, which he has spoken about in several articles, including in a book review last year in the Int'l Herald Tribune of Christopher Hitchens's book, "God Is Not Great."(Kinsley lavished praise on the book.) Kinsley's choice or inclination not to be other-centered was also evident in an article he wrote in 2006 for the Washington Post about embryonic stem cell research: "Even strong believers in abortion rights (I'm one) ought to acknowledge and respect the moral sincerity of many right-to-lifers. I cannot share, or even fathom, their conviction that a microscopic dot -- as oblivious as a rock, more primitive than a worm -- has the same human rights as anyone reading this article. I don't have their problem with the question of when human life begins. (When did "human" life begin during evolution? Obviously, there is no magic point. But that doesn't prevent us from claiming humanity for ourselves and denying it to the embryo-like entities we evolved from.)" I agree that "[f]acing death does appear to clarify the mind in every generation," but I hope that Kinsley's 'me-first' attitude is more the exception than the rule in this generation.
The latest from america
The people of God see the bishop of Rome as a teacher, but they also unquestionably see him as a father.
Since the death of Pope Francis, lists of his possible successors have proliferated on social media and in newspapers. Should you trust them?
A Homily for the Third Sunday of Easter, by Terrance Klein
In a pre-conclave meeting, an Italian cardinal, and backer of Cardinal Parolin as next pope, attacked Pope Francis for opening positions of responsibility in the church to men and women not in holy orders.