Get out your scorecards

Over at the National Catholic Reporter, John Allen offers an inside baseball look at exactly what the heck is going on at the Vatican regarding the L.C.W.R. clampdown, or is it? Allen offers a somewhat calming dissection of the behind the scenes jockeying that took place, is probably still taking place, between the CDF and the Consecrated Life and Societies of Apostolic Life, better known as the "Congregation for Religious." Readers will be shocked, shocked to learn that there may be some intrigue and hard feelings this week in Rome after the CDF move against (or as Allen would have it, "with") the L.C.W.R. among the leaders of the Consecrated Life who had spent a good part of last year attempting to soothe anxieties among U.S. women religious.

Says Allen:


It's an open secret that the tones emanating from these two departments about women religious in America are rather distinct.

Under Brazilian Cardinal João Bráz de Aviz and American Archbishop Joseph Tobin, the Congregation for Religious in the last couple of years has attempted to calm anxieties generated by a wide-ranging apostolic visitation of women's religious communities in the United States, which recently reached conclusion. (That's a separate process from the doctrinal review of LCWR; more on that in a moment.) Bráz and Tobin have signaled that they want dialogue, not confrontation, and have made clear there won't be any immediate earthquake as a result of the visitation.

When the LCWR initially said it was "stunned" by the assessment from the Congregation for the Faith, there was swift blowback. Critics said the tensions outlined in the document have been brewing for decades, so what's the surprise? Vatican insiders also insisted that Levada had written to LCWR in late February to inform them that results of the assessment would be discussed in an April meeting.

Yet the shock was nonetheless understandable, given the more conciliatory signals LCWR and other leaders in women's religious life had been receiving from the Congregation for Religious.

In broad strokes, the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith believes that fundamental deviations from Catholic faith and practice have been allowed to fester inside some circles of women's religious life for too long, which they see as especially serious in the case of LCWR, given that it's a juridical person under canon law, approved by the Vatican, with a special responsibility to faithfully represent the church. The climate in the Congregation for Religious, meanwhile, tends to the view that now is a time for confidence-building exercises rather than what will inevitably be perceived as punitive measures. In addition, some senior Vatican officials, and not just in the Congregation for Religious, worry that the LCWR overhaul feeds images of a clerical boys' club hostile to women.

To be clear, the contrast, at least inside Vatican walls, isn't so much over whether the doctrinal assessment points to some real concerns. It's instead over whether the overhaul announced April 18 is the right way to address those concerns and whether this is the right time to do it.

Allen also suggests, that with U.S. Cardinal Levada retiring from the CDF next year, the proposed five-year overhaul of the L.C.W.R. may not prove as traumatic as many fear today:

"... in fairly short order, the Congregation for the Faith could be led by a non-American who might not feel the same personal investment in the process.

"To be sure, other personnel involved in the assessment won't necessarily be moving on and the Congregation for the Faith has a deep institutional memory, so Levada's departure probably won't signal a sea change in approach. It could, however, betoken a difference in intensity, and by itself, that might be significant."

You can read the rest of his frustratingly even-tempered analysis here.

Comments are automatically closed two weeks after an article's initial publication. See our comments policy for more.
Rick Fueyo
6 years 5 months ago
This line gave me a laugh

"You can read the rest of his frustratingly even-tempered analysis"

I have great respect for John Allen's reporting, and even more respect for the seeming state of his soul based on his writing.  But he reminds me of a beloved pastor we used to have that one of my colleagues said would shake the hand of Satan himself and bless him instead of judging.  That pastor was a good and holy man, and I strove to be like him in my dealings with all people. But he had a very difficult time actually judging any situation.
Helen Smith
6 years 5 months ago
Interesting to note that Cardinal Levada was working in the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith (1976 to 1982) when Sister Theresa Kane R.S.M., a past president of the LCWR, made her famous plea to Pope John Paul II for the inclusion of women in all ministries of the church, including the ordination of women, during his visit to the United States in 1979.  
Maybe Levada has a long memory.
Jim McCrea
6 years 5 months ago
Levada has a SELECTIVE memory.


The latest from america

 10.17.2018 Pope Francis greets Cardinal Blase J. Cupich of Chicago before a session of the Synod of Bishops on young people, the faith and vocational discernment at the Vatican Oct. 16. (CNS photo/Vatican Media)
“We take people where they are, walking with them, moving forward,” Cardinal Blase Cupich said.
Michael J. O’LoughlinOctober 20, 2018
Catherine Pakaluk, who currently teaches at the Catholic University of America and holds a Ph.D. in Economics from Harvard University, describes her tweet to Mr. Macron as “spirited” and “playful.”
Emma Winters October 19, 2018
A new proposal from the Department of Homeland Security could make it much more difficult for legal immigrants to get green cards in the United States. But even before its implementation, the proposal has led immigrants to avoid receiving public benefits.
J.D. Long-GarcíaOctober 19, 2018
 Archbishop Carlo Maria Vigano, then nuncio to the United States, and then-Cardinal Theodore E. McCarrick of Washington, are seen in a combination photo during the beatification Mass of Blessed Miriam Teresa Demjanovich at the Cathedral Basilica of the Sacred Heart in Newark, N.J., Oct. 4, 2014. (CNS photo/Gregory A. Shemitz)
In this third letter Archbishop Viganò no longer insists, as he did so forcefully in his first letter, that the restrictions that he claimed Benedict XVI had imposed on Archbishop McCarrick—one he alleges that Pope Francis later lifted—can be understood as “sanctions.”
Gerard O’ConnellOctober 19, 2018