Noted Jesuit human rights lawyer discusses the sex abuse scandal in Australia

As a lawyer, professor and human rights activist, Frank Brennan, S.J., occupies a unique position in Australian civil and religious society. He is well known throughout the country, both inside and outside the church, for his decades-long work as an advocate in the areas of law, social justice and reconciliation with Aboriginal Australians.

For services to Aboriginals, he was named an Officer of the Order of Australia and the National Trust has classified him as a Living National Treasure. In addition to his work in his native Australia, Father Brennan recently held the Gasson Chair at Boston College's Law School.

On a recent trip to Australia just before Holy Week, I sat down with Father Brennan in Melbourne to discuss the state of the church in Australia in light of the ongoing Royal Commission on child sexual abuse and the unprecedented 20 hours of testimony from Cardinal Pell that was televised nationally.

The following interview is being published in partnership with Eureka Street, an online journal of politics, religion and culture sponsored by the Australian Jesuits.

America: What sense do you have regarding the sex abuse scandal here in Australia and how it compares to the United States?

Frank Brennan, S.J.: In Australia we are not as litigious as you are in America and damages are usually not as high as they are in the United States. But having said that I have no doubt there will be further developments in the law here in Australia. Particularly in light of much of the evidence that many of the bishops have given that seems to indicate that prior to 1996 it would be very difficult to argue that the best interests of the child was the highest priority. Prior to 1996 there was a great lack of awareness among the senior church leaders and there was a lack of action by senior church leaders.

Now without imputing moral blame necessarily, you simply have to say that the system was broken and if you had a system and it was broken and children were being abused because of that, I think you're talking about legal liability not just moral liability.

America: Despite the fact that you and Cardinal Pell have had your differences over the years, you were pretty public about saying that he deserved due process. What prompted that?

FB: Well, I thought there was a sort of lynch mob mentality developing. A popular singer putting out a song that says he was scum, a coward and a buffoon. Well it's a free country, singers can say what they like, but to have the song being played routinely on all the mainstream media before he appeared seemed a bit unfair.

But then what was truly objectionable is that the Royal Commission was engaged in two case studies. The first into the archdiocese of Melbourne where Pell had been an auxiliary bishop and then the archbishop. The second was into the diocese of Ballarat where he had been a consultor to the bishop of Ballarat many years before when he was a young priest.

Just before Cardinal Pell was to give evidence there was a leak which must have emanated originally from the Victoria Police Force, suggesting that Pell himself was being investigated for child abuse. Now these are completely unsubstantiated and uninvestigated complaints. To have this complaint emanating originally from the Victorian police force when the Royal Commission on these two case studies was investigating not only the Catholic Church but also the Victoria Police, made it very dubious.

Secondly, Victoria is one of the sponsoring governments of the Royal Commission. To have its own police force in someway involved in a leaking exercise when you have a star witness about to appear, I thought risked muddying the waters significantly. And though Cardinal Pell and I have had our past tensions I was strongly of the view that a witness like that deserved the protections of due process and natural justice.

America: Has anything happened with those allegations?

FB: Well, nothing has happened and Cardinal Pell himself immediately referred the matter to the Victorian government demanding an investigation into the leak. So we'll have to wait and see what happens with that but it’s not made easy when the Victorian police commissioner himself goes on the radio and says he hasn't even read Cardinal Pell’s statement. Well that tests the credulity of the situation pretty substantially you'd have to say.

Somebody was definitely trying to throw a red herring out there and basically my point as a lawyer was to simply say that, look, people are up to no good here and that if victims are to really benefit from a Royal Commission of this sort then you have to ensure that the key witness, Pell, is given due process so that everyone can be assured that there can be a good outcome.

Let's face it, there are three key outcomes that you want from the commission of this sort. First is some sense of closure for the victims themselves. Well, there was such hysteria building about Pell that I found it difficult to see how people would be coming to any kind of closure. If anything it seemed to be re-opening old wounds.

Secondly, what you need is a national redress scheme where you have buy-in from all major institutions. Well, in order to get that—and we don't yet have it from national politicians—you need everyone at the table, including those that might be Pell supporters.

Thirdly, in order to protect children in the future within a federal system like Australia, you've got to ensure that national institutions like churches can work cooperatively with state agencies like the state police forces.

Now if you have the Victorian police up to no good against Cardinal Pell it is going to make it very difficult in the future for the Catholic Church and the Victorian police to work cooperatively together. Bear in mind there is a history to this when the Victorian parliamentary inquiry which had looked into what was called the Melbourne Response. That was Cardinal Pell’s attempt when he was archbishop of Melbourne to set up a protocol and procedure for granting damages, compensation and counseling for victims. And that was worked out in close cooperation with the Victorian police, including the Victorian government and the Victorian Solicitor General. But when it came time for the Victorian inquiry, Victorian police ran 1,000,000 miles and said, “Oh, no, we never approved of it.” That sort of thing was very unhelpful.

America: Do you think bishops or other church leaders might receive jail sentences?

FB: There are some offenses such as failing to report criminal activity and we have one archbishop at the moment, Archbishop Philip Wilson, the archbishop of Adelaide, who is facing such a charge. We don't know the details of that charge. On Dec. 30, the archbishop said he was going back to work because he said that he was “sick of waiting.” That, for me as a lawyer, is a strange decision. I think that it's got to the stage where it's probably only Catholic bishops in Australia who could be involved with the running of organizations charged with the care of children who, if charged with a criminal offense in relation to such an activity, might say, “Well, I think I'm just going to keep turning up to the office every day.” I think that we have to take the rule of law a bit more seriously than that.

America: In terms of the Royal Commission's investigation into sex abuse and Australian life, I feel like we're in a little bit of the calm before the storm moment right now. What is your sense of what the Royal Commissions is doing and how is the church bracing itself?

FB: Well, the first thing to say especially for American readers is that the Royal Commission is a special sort of English-Australian beast. You are not used to that sort of thing in America. It's a bit like a grand jury but a Royal Commission is given a task by government and has the capacity to subpoena people and subpoena documents to conduct a pretty ruthless inquiry into whatever the issue at hand is. Now what was particularly distinctive about this Royal Commission [is that] instead of just having one Royal Commissioner there are six of them. Initially when the commission was set up it was said that it would run for three years. Normally a commission would run for about a year.

There's a saying in Australian politics that “a government should never call a Royal Commission unless it already knows the answer the commission is going to give.” No one knew what answers this commission was going to give when this commission was announced. I was little dubious about it because I said when the prime minister announced it that it would take at least five years. People at the time scoffed at this saying that I was just engaging in scare tactics. But indeed over time they applied for an extension and it is to be a five-year Royal Commission.

This Royal Commission is not simply focused on the Catholic Church. It is focused across institutions of Australia. So it's also looking into institutions like the Boy Scouts, state child welfare institutions, etc. Because Australia is a federation, it gets complex. This is a Royal Commission sponsored not just by the national government by the by the state governments and I've always said that the rubber will really hit the road when we get clarity about the working relationship between institutions like churches together with the state child welfare agencies and the state police forces. So that's one of the very difficult tasks it has to perform.

One disadvantage of a five-year Royal Commission is that even institutions that are well-meaning and saying, “Well, yes, we have to clean up our act,” feel as if they are put on hold for five years until the Royal Commission finally reports. So that if you make changes in your own protocols as things are going along they might prove to be inadequate in terms of whatever standards or procedures that Royal Commission might stipulate.

If you look at the Catholic Church, it has a protocol called “Towards Healing” and the Melbourne archdiocese has its own protocol called “The Melbourne Response.” Now we know, for example, that the Melbourne archdiocese quite responsibly commissioned a senior lawyer to review the Melbourne Response and he reported back in September last year. But the question is what do you do with the report given that what is hanging over you in two years time will be a definitive report from the Royal Commission, which will stipulate what should be the preferred protocol and approach in dealing with these issues.

So that's a bit why we’re in the calm before the storm. We’ve got another two years before the end of the five-year waiting period and we get a final report from the Royal Commission.

The other thing to say about Royal Commissions generally is that, yes, they can be great media events, particularly when you have a star witness like Cardinal Pell. But inevitably there's a sense of let-down after the Royal Commission reports because it reports to the government of the day, and then the report sits on the government desk while they then set up internal working groups within government to determine what the government response should be and what legislation is required. That's often where the very painstaking work is to be done, but it doesn't have the same kind of media appeal as putting Cardinal Pell there in the spotlight and having 20 hours of cross-examination. Whatever comes of that is still some years down the track.

America: What is your sense of the Australian people’s reaction to all this, particularly among Catholics?

FB: A lot of people’s despair has already manifested itself. I think it's fair to say that a lot of people have given up going to Mass. But it's equally fair to say that the demand for Catholic schools in Australia is the greatest it’s ever been, the demand for Catholic health care is the greatest ever and the demand for Catholic social services is the greatest it’s ever been in Australia. So where you have the human face of Christ out there and actually delivering the services I think there's tended in the past to be greater lay control and of course particularly in the health sector there's always been very strong control by women in the church. But when it comes to parishes and the administration of dioceses I think that's where the slow death has been occurring.

I think that the Royal Commission and its outcomes are simply one part of that. The other part of it is the more generic issue as to where your post-modern generation finds the need for an institutional church, a sacramental priesthood in order to be able to embrace the transcendent or to be able to express that which is spiritual in order to be able to find a place for community in living a life of faith. And also making sense of ideas such as tradition and authority in that we all know the young people for whom ideas of traditional authority don't really have much relevance when it comes to the spiritual domain.

America: Do you have any hope for that?

FB: I do. I don't despair in terms of getting them all back to church, but I think one of the good things that happened here in Australia as in United States a generation ago, we had a long-running debate about the place of conscience over and against that of authority. In fact I wrote a book at the time called Acting on Conscience. That debate is over and done with, in that basically the only way forward now is in terms of espousing that the individual form and inform her conscience and to that conscience be true. The church leadership and traditional authority need to be on hand to assist in that collaborative task. The idea that you would simply say that all the faithful need do would be to follow the episcopal leadership is no longer saleable. We’ve seen too many bishops on display when it came to the simple issue of protecting children whose interests were secondary.

America: So, what’s it like being a living national treasure?

FB: [Laughs] You cope as best you can. Every 10 years I go to America for an appointment at a Jesuit university…the nice thing is to go to a place where nobody knows you and the phone isn’t for you. [Laughs] Whereas when you’re “Living National Treasure” in a small place like Australia, you normally get called in on controversies of all manner and sorts.

ed gleason
1 year 2 months ago
The Church will always need and should treasure 'Stand up priests' like Brennan S.J.. . The Irish Rising anniversary tells us there were no bishops that sided with the Rising. All insitutionalists of all entities need the stand-up people to keep them from settling for and keeping a comfortable self saving institution.. Harrah for and bless us with a deluge of stand-up men and women.in Churches, in Government, in Business, in education in non profits, in clubs etc ... because all entities have a built-in corrupting operating system. If humans have a fallen nature, the entites they create have the fallen nature on steroids. .
Crystal Watson
1 year 2 months ago
It's not that Australians are less litigious than Anericans. It has been practically impossible for abuse victims in Australia to sue the church because of the 'Ellis defense', courtesy of Pell, which found the church in Australia not liable for the actions of priests ... http://www.abc.net.au/news/2014-06-30/jennifer-herrick-ellis-defence/5560198 A really informative video about Cardinal Pell and sex abuse with award winning journalist David Marr at ABC ... http://www.abc.net.au/tv/bigideas/stories/2013/11/11/3888066.htm University of Sydney law professor, Patrick Parkinson, has written that his research showed that the Catholic Church in Australia has a much higher rate of abuse than the other churches combined ... http://www.abc.net.au/religion/articles/2013/10/25/3877103.htm ... Both he and retired Australian bishop Geoffrey Robinson opine this is due to mandatory celibacy ... http://ncronline.org/blogs/grace-margins/australian-bishop-launches-petition-council-sex-abuse
William Rydberg
1 year 2 months ago
In my opinion, one would have to either way too close to following this news item; or delusional; if they conclude that this is only a denominational male priest problem. Here in Canada at least, the number of pedophilia cases are mushrooming. Sadly, the common denominator appears to be unrestricted access (and the perpetrators are men & women, both single and married). What makes me sad is, that no matter the line of work or sector, public, private, etc... So many innocent working people have been unjustly accused. Of course, the poor children, there are no words... Finally, when it comes to the Catholic Church, people are forgetting to mention the real elephant in the room, which is God's Justice. Properly Catechized Catholics should understand Fear of Lord, respect that the Lord's Justice will in the end prevail, for it is as awesome as Love. Lord have mercy on all sinners... We all need to repent according to St John... in Christ, 7th Day of the Easter Octave 2016
Crystal Watson
1 year 2 months ago
It's true abuse happens in many venues and is committed by different kinds of people, but as Fr. Anthony Ruff once commented on another post here ... http://americamagazine.org/content/all-things/beware-non-celibates-writing-about-celibacy?page=1 ... "[...] There is lots of abuse in public schools – but we have to look at how many hours children spend in public schools, how many school employees they are in contact with, and compare that (on a level playing field) with children’s hours in Catholic church activities and with celibate clergy. If (to pick hypothetical numbers) children have 40 times as many contact hours with public school employees but the rate of abuse is only 10 times higher than with celibate clergy, this would tell us that there is way more abuse in public schools, but proportionately the abuse if four times more likely to happen in the Catholic setting. Same with families – let’s compare family members’ total contact with children with that of Catholic priests. Of course there is way more abuse in families – but how much more, and is it proportionate? What we really need – but I’m not aware of such data – is a comparison of the rates of child abuse by married Protestant and Orthodox clergy with the rates among celibate Catholic clergy. I know of no proof that the Catholic rate is equal or lower, and I suspect it is higher. I can’t imagine that all these Protestant ministers have been abusing children and somehow the media missed it. The obvious difference between Catholic and Protestant clergy is celibacy ..."
William Rydberg
1 year 2 months ago
What's needed is that this stops. NOW! This stuff is not about sex or about celibacy or not about celibacy it's about Power. I recently read in our National Paper about a woman teacher maybe 30 who got involved with dozens of grade schoolers. It's about Power...
Crystal Watson
1 year 2 months ago
Yeah. I don't mean to say that celibacy causes people to become pedophiles. But an institution that says it will insure lifelong celibacy in those who join up, might tend to attract a higher than average number of people with emotional/sexual issues. And then when abusing or any sexual activity does occur, it tends to be kept secret or covered up because it's against official policy.
William Rydberg
1 year 2 months ago
I assume that you are not a coreligionist because it's not the Institution that conveys the Grace to live a life of celibacy, but the Trinity, personally (remember that in accordance with Catholic teaching, it's not just the physical act according to Jesus Gospel teaching, it's the inner disposition-Matt 5:28). It's difficult to accept otherwise, one could reasonably question giving up something now, for a non-existent "future" reward. I suppose atheist libertarians, materialists, and really anybody that believe that this is "it" could question practices ranging from celibacy to vegetarianism, raising a future generation, accumulating large amounts of wealth that one is unable to spend with nobility in their own lifetime, having one husband or wife, tax evasion, and (you name it) if this was all there is... Fortunately, that's not the case for we have the Grace of the Catholic Church, which is the Body of Jesus-God come in the flesh. And from a Catholic point of view, one would be remiss without mentioning (among others) Ephesians 6:12 and God's perfect final Justice briefly mentioned above (this includes 1 Jn 5:16-17 among others). I apologize if this is not what you hold dear. It's my poor Apologetic* (Note: * I now use the Catholic definition for "Apologetic", here and going forward). So many great Catholic writers have over the years have done a much better Apologetic ( perhaps try Catholic Answers Website: www.catholic.com or the Catechism of the Catholic Church CCC at www.vatican.va ). Much fine stuff has been written about the subject, and I am certain that even more fine stuff will be written in the future on the subject, God willing... Just my opinion, in The Risen Christ, 8th Day of the Octave...
Crystal Watson
1 year 2 months ago
No, I think celibacy is fine and good if it is voluntary. You could say that every priest and vowed religious takes that on voluntarily by joining the church, but the truth seems to be that a significant percentage of them don't actually practice celibacy. So there's an official stance and then there is actual lived life that can't be publicly acknowledged. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/ireland/1508431/500-Irish-priests-having-regular-sex-with-women.html http://www.newsweek.com/romes-subculture-gay-priests-rocks-vatican-74397
William Rydberg
1 year 2 months ago
I am comfortable with Jesus Just Judgement. As a Catholic, one of the highest priorities/duties we have is to pray for our priests. Private revelation concerning The Most Sacred Heart of Jesus (a Jesuit favorite devotion) as well as the Divine Mercy (revelations centuries apart) agree on the importance of praying for our priests both the good and otherwise... No priest, no Mass, no Sacrament of Reconciliation...etc... As a Catholic, I thank Jesus every day for our priests. Nuff said... in Christ, Happy Easter 8th Day of the Octave & Divine Mercy Sunday.
Crystal Watson
1 year 2 months ago
Priests are a good thing. I think it would just be more honest to let them have aboveboard romantic relationships. Eastern Rite Catholic priests, Eastern Orthodox priests, Anglican priests - all are priests and can be married, so it's not like it's unheard of. But anyway, I give up :)
Bill Mazzella
1 year 2 months ago
Meanwhile in Pennsylvania the clergy remain a recalcitrant bunch still covering up 14 years after the bishops "repented" for their cover-up of the abuses. Everyone is now convinced that statute of limitation of child sex abuse have to be change all over. We are waiting for New York Archdiocese to open up their files. No place is more mafia than the archdiocese of NY which so far has not been fully exposed. http://www.nytimes.com/2016/04/05/us/pennsylvania-clergy-sex-abuse.html?ref=todayspaper&_r=0

Don't miss the best from America

Sign up for our Newsletter to get the Jesuit perspective on news, faith and culture.

The latest from america

Father Stanley Rother, a priest of the Oklahoma City Archdiocese who was brutally murdered in 1981 in the Guatemalan village where he ministered to the poor, is shown baptizing a child in this undated photo. (CNS) 
Before Father Rother died for his people, he had farmed with them, listened to them and spoken of God to them.
Terrance KleinJune 28, 2017
Pope Francis greets young refugees during a conference on families and adolescent education at Rome's Basilica of St. John Lateran on June 19. (CNS photo/L'Osservatore Romano via Reuters)
“This is a pretty broad exception to the ban,” David Robinson says, “and it does allow for legitimate entry into the United States for people who can pass the screening process, which is what we want.”
Kevin ClarkeJune 28, 2017
The texture and variety of Stevens's new album creates liminal spaces between the sacred and the profane.
Reconnect Brooklyn is investing in people rather than properties, the residents who are struggling to remain in Bed-Stuy amid rising costs.
Wyatt MasseyJune 28, 2017