Empathy and the Supreme Court

In case you haven't noticed it yet, we've just posted a Web-only article by Pepperdine law professor Douglas W. Kmiec on the search for a new Supreme Court Justice. In "The Case for Empathy," Kmiec addresses the conservative idealogues who see "empathy" as merely a code word for abortion rights or other liberal dogmas:

Empathy yields one additional lesson: law is no substitute for love. Yes, it is wrong when the Court usurps legislative function or when it disregards the structure of the Constitution that reserves appropriate questions to the states. Yet it is empathy that gives insight into where exactly no government—federal or state—should be involved. In times past, it may have been possible to count upon church or competing private institutions to maintain this boundary between what is public and what is private, but these independent sources of moral formation have also come to overly rely on the crutch of law’s coercion.In the end, however, coerced morality is without meaning or lasting effect.

Advertisement

Read the whole article here.

Tim Reidy

Comments are automatically closed two weeks after an article's initial publication. See our comments policy for more.
9 years 3 months ago
It is not empathy I want but a sense of justice, with the willingness and the ability to weigh the equal protection rights of individuals (i.e., the right to be treated equally by the state) with the right of majorities to rule.  Most times when you look at examples of "empathy" or "judicial activism" what you really have is judges being judges.  It is hard to define a standard to judge whether the majority is picking on the rights of the minority - but like other obscenity - you know it when you see it. It really is not rocket science.  You have two lawyers and several amici making a case and the one that makes it better wins.  That is the rub, actually, because an unskilled advocate - or one with hidden objectives - can really mess up the result for whole classes of individuals.
9 years 3 months ago
Can someone define "empathy"? Or is it one of those things that one just knows when seen, like pornograph?
9 years 3 months ago
As long as a SCOTUS justice has empathy for the unborn, he or she is alright by me.

Advertisement

The latest from america

"The Catholic Cook Book," published in 1965, is exactly that: a cookbook for Catholics and those who want to learn about Catholicism and how it relates to food.
Vivian CabreraAugust 16, 2018
Cardinal Donald W. Wuerl of Washington is pictured as Pope Francis celebrates Mass in Washington Sept. 23, 2015. (CNS photo/Paul Haring)
“Those who have suffered are his priority, and the Church wants to listen to them to root out this tragic horror.”
Victims of clergy sexual abuse and their family members listen as Pennsylvania Attorney General Josh Shapiro speaks about a grand jury’s investigation of clergy sexual abuse. (AP Photo/Matt Rourke)
On the Feast of the Assumption and following more revelations of sexual abuse, a priest reflects on the hard work required for the church to “come to perfection.”
Sam Sawyer, S.J. August 16, 2018
Today America joins more than 300 U.S. publications in support of the free press, which has been repeatedly insulted by President Donald J. Trump.
The EditorsAugust 16, 2018