Douthat on Newmania

Ross Douthat, an intelligent and literate Catholic observer, and a columnist in the New York Times, writes perceptively on the surprising turnout for Pope Benedict in light of the protests by atheists like Richard Dawkins and predictions of embarrassing crowds.  (The same phenomenon of surprised secular observers happened during the pope's visit to the States in 2008).  He's spot-on when it comes to the hidden Catholics who practice their faith and who are loyal to the office of the pope; he's less spot-on, I think, it comes to the trauma inflicted on the church by the abuse crisis.  But he's always worth reading.  See what you think.  A bit here:

No doubt most of Britain’s five million Catholics do not believe exactly what Benedict believes and teaches. No doubt most of them are appalled at the Catholic hierarchy’s record on priestly child abuse, and disappointed that many of the scandal’s enablers still hold high office in the church.


But in turning out for their beleaguered pope, Britain’s Catholics acknowledged something essential about their faith that many of the Vatican’s critics, secular and religious alike, persistently fail to understand. They weren’t there to voice agreement with Benedict, necessarily. They were there to show their respect — for the pontiff, for his office, and for the role it has played in sustaining Catholicism for 2,000 years.

Conventional wisdom holds that such respect is increasingly misplaced, and that the papacy is increasingly a millstone around Roman Catholicism’s neck. If it weren’t for the reactionaries in the Vatican, the argument runs, priests might have been permitted to marry, forestalling the sex abuse crisis. Birth control, gay relationships, divorce and remarriage might have been blessed, bringing lapsed Catholics back into the fold. Theological dissent would have been allowed to flourish, creating a more welcoming environment for religious seekers.

Read the rest here.

James Martin, SJ


Comments are automatically closed two weeks after an article's initial publication. See our comments policy for more.
8 years 3 months ago
Catholicism is a religion not a political party to be swayed by the mere desires of its membership in a changing culture.  This quote from the article sums up the danger in treating it as the latter: 

"But the example of Catholicism’s rivals suggests that the church might well be much worse off if it had simply refashioned itself to fit the prevailing values of the age. That’s what the denominations of mainline Protestantism have done, across the last four decades — and instead of gaining members, they’ve dwindled into irrelevance."

Thomas Piatak
8 years 3 months ago
Thanks for highlighting this excellent column by Douthat, and for America's outsanding coverage of Pope Benedict's trip to Britain, a trip that inspired this American.
8 years 3 months ago
I wonder what Fr. Martin, Mr. Douthat or Mr. Ivereigh would think about Benedict's final address to the English speaking bishops beforeh is departure (stressing the "value" of the new Mass translation and urging said bishops to be "generous" in the welcomin gof anglican convert coomunities -which Benedict sees as an advance in Catholic/Anglican relations.)
Strikes me that the value of Benedict's visit may be a beautiful moment followed by scepticism and division of the policies he pursues subsequently.


The latest from america

Women served as deacons in Europe for about a millennium in a variety of ministerial and sacramental roles.
Brandon SanchezJanuary 15, 2019
In preparation for the gathering in Abu Dhabi, I find myself asking why my conversations with the future Pope Francis so powerfully affected both of us.
Abraham SkorkaJanuary 15, 2019
Photo: iStock
Included on the list is John T. Ryan, S.J., who from 1989 to 1994 was an associate editor for development at America.
Michael J. O’LoughlinJanuary 15, 2019
Did you ever wonder why Jesus was baptized? What sins did Jesus have to repent of? Nothing.
James Martin, S.J.January 14, 2019