Death Sentence Upheld for Christian Woman Under Pakistan's Blasphemy Laws

It is hard to believe, but it appears that a five year court odyssey for a Pakistani Christian mother of five will continue. Yesterday an appeals court in Pakistan upheld the death sentence against Asia Bibi for "blasphemy" against Islam. Bibi, 45, has been imprisoned since 2009 while appealing her death sentence for allegedly denigrating the prophet Mohammed and Christian evangelizing. Accused by Muslim co-workers after a dispute over a communal water source, according to her defense team, she was convicted under Pakistan's infamous blasphemy laws. The blasphemy statutes have been consistently condemned by international judicial authorities.

The Lahore High Court ruled that Bibi's execution by hanging could be carried out. According to one media report, witnesses said judges Anwar Ul Haq and Shahbaz Ali Rizvi upheld the death sentence "amid pressure from dozens Islamists, including clergy, who were watching proceedings."

Advertisement

Bibi's case brought global attention to Pakistan's blasphemy laws, which are frequently used to target Christians or troublesome politicians or community leaders. They have even been known to be fraudulently deployed by neighbors seeking to settle scores with Christians or seize their property. Two politicians, the governor of Pakistan's Punjab province, Salman Taseer, and Christian federal minister Shahbaz Bhatti, were assassinated in 2011 for criticizing the blasphemy legislation under which Bibi was sentenced.

The Centre for Legal Aid Assistance and Settlement (CLAAS), which defended Bibi, said it intends to submit a final appeal to the Supreme Court within the allotted 30 days, noting this process "could last a number of years."

CLAAS issued a statement following the court decision, describing it as unexpected and complaining that the court was under "obvious" pressure from "extremists." According to CLAAS, "religious Islamists and fanatic lawyers who do not want to pursue the cases as normal legal process...become emotional in these matters and do not want to listen [to] anyone, as they want to just punish with death." Increasingly such outside pressure is prejudicing court outcomes on blasphemy charges, the organization complains.

The CLAAS statement ended: "We are deeply saddened by the court decision today which was not passed on merit and it would not be wrong if we say that it was biased decision. CLAAS team is very much disheartens and we are worried about the other cases of blasphemy which are under proceeding in the different courts of Punjab."

Comments are automatically closed two weeks after an article's initial publication. See our comments policy for more.
Sandi Sinor
3 years ago
When I read stories like this one, and like those coming out of the middle east where Christians are being persecuted and driven from their homes and countries, I can't help but wonder if the US bishops who complain so loudly about the US denying them their "religious freedom" ever read the news.

Advertisement

Don't miss the best from America

Sign up for our Newsletter to get the Jesuit perspective on news, faith and culture.

The latest from america

Pope Francis issues public correction to Cardinal Robert Sarah on who has final say over liturgical translations.
Gerard O'ConnellOctober 22, 2017
It is astonishing to think that God would choose to enter the world this way: as a fragile newborn who could not even hold up his own head without help.
Ginny Kubitz MoyerOctober 20, 2017
Protestors rally to support Temporary Protected Status near the U.S. Capitol in Washington on Sept. 26. (CNS photo/Tyler Orsburn)
Around 200,000 Salvadorans and 57,000 Hondurans have been residing in the United States for more than 15 years under Temporary Protected Status. But that status is set to expire in early 2018.
J.D. Long-GarcíaOctober 20, 2017
At the heart of Anne Frank’s life and witness is a hopeful faith in humanity.
Leo J. O'Donovan, S.J.October 20, 2017