Civilta Cattolica Praises US Health Care Reform

From Catholic News Service, a surprising story: La Civilta Cattolica, the semi-official Vatican publication (run by the Jesuits but whose contents are vetted by the Secretariat of State) has praised the recently passed U.S. health care reform legislation.  The article, by Andrea Vicini, SJ, is here, in Italian

Jesuit journal praises US health reform law as needed, long-awaited 

Advertisement

By Carol Glatz Catholic News Service 

ROME (CNS) -- The health care reform law passed in the United States marked "a needed and long awaited beginning" of bringing greater justice to all citizens, especially the most vulnerable, said an influential Jesuit journal. "Limited access to health care compromised in many ways the health of citizens and the country," said the journal, La Civilta Cattolica. It also said the different positions within the U.S. Catholic community over whether the measure should have been passed reflected a "clash" of differing opinions over how to implement church social teaching.

The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, signed into law by President Barack Obama March 23, is a continuation of efforts by U.S. presidents to introduce "measures that aim for greater justice for all citizens and, in particular, for the most vulnerable," the journal said. The Rome-based biweekly magazine is reviewed by the Vatican Secretariat of State before publication.

The June 5 article, released to journalists June 3, was written by Italian Jesuit Father Andrea Vicini, a professor at the Pontifical Faculty of Theology of Southern Italy in Naples and visiting professor at the School of Theology and Ministry at Boston College. The article praised the substance of the law, especially its aim of making the health care system less expensive, more efficient and more dedicated to the needs of the people, especially the estimated 15 percent of the population with no current heath care coverage.

However, the Jesuit magazine lamented the extreme divisiveness that built up during the debate on the measure, saying that "the monolithic opposition of the Republican Party was surprising," especially given that some innovative projects for providing universal health care coverage had been promoted by some notable Republican leaders in the recent past. "The degree of division and political and partisan opposition that crystallized during the months of debate before the reform was a source of concern for whomever takes to heart the common good of the neediest citizens and for the whole of the nation, and for whomever is convinced that the promotion and safeguarding of heath are precious assets for nations and all of humanity," it said.

The article discussed the role of Catholics in the debate by noting the divisions among Catholics themselves. It explained the position of the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops, which was against the measure because its provisions on abortionfunding and conscience protections were morally unacceptable. However, some pro-life members of Congress eventually supported the bill, the journal said, when they felt ambiguities in the proposed law concerning abortion would be resolved, specifically with a presidential executive order promising to ensure no federal funds would be spent on abortion.

The article detailed the three major religious associations that came out publicly in favor of the final version of the proposed law: the Catholic Health Association, led by its president and CEO Daughter of Charity Sister Carol Keehan; the national Catholic social justice lobby, Network, led by its director, Sister Simone Campbell, a Sister of Social Service; and a group of religious women representing numerous women's congregations.

"Beyond the novelty of a female voice with a social and ecclesial commitment, the discussion that accompanied the reform's passage the past months showed how it is possible to find at different levels in today's ecclesial reality the common and shared determination that the Catholic church's social doctrine be at the forefront of asking for a consistent and long-term dedication to justice and a clear preferential option for the poor," it said. However, when such a strong commitment to Gospel-based values is translated into action, the usual result is that "the diverse ways of actualizing that prophetic commitment clash," it said.

The article said that the March 24 presidential executive order "Ensuring Enforcement and Implementation of Abortion Restrictions in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act," demonstrated that the president had taken into account the bishops' concerns and supported the demands concerning abortion made by the religious women who supported the reform.

According to the head of the U.S. bishops' Committee on Pro-Life Activities, Cardinal Daniel N. DiNardo of Galveston-Houston, the law was "an important step toward ensuring access to health coverage for all Americans," but was "profoundly flawed in its treatment of abortion, conscience rights and fairness to immigrants," said the Jesuit journal. The article said the cardinal hoped Congress would approve a bipartisan bill before the House of Representatives that would resolve the "errors regarding abortion and conscientious objection contained in the reform" law.

James Martin, SJ

 

Comments are automatically closed two weeks after an article's initial publication. See our comments policy for more.
Tom Maher
7 years 6 months ago
The good Jesuits of Rome should be inform that the weekly Rasmussen polls on health care law repeal shows increaing majorities of voters in favor of repeal. This week the poll went to 60% in favor of repeal from 58% earlier. Voter opposition to the law is building. Political opposition to the law is becomming fihgly organized due to th eintense vbter sentiment.

A petition to repeal the new health care law can be found at wwww.revereamerica.org.

American voters are intensely oppossed to the new health care law and its obnoxious mandates. This will be a big facto in the Novemeber elections. The law itself will likely be repealed sometime in the future.
James Lindsay
7 years 6 months ago
Not much new news here. They pretty much reported what happened. Rasmussen, for whatever reason, has a biased sample. It is useful for selling momentum, not measuring it. Repeal is impossible without impossibly large majorities in the House and Senate - indeed, even if the GOP took every contested seat in November, there are not enough votes to override an Obama veto under any circumstance. Given recent GOP bad behavior, the GOP could even lose seats. Neither health law repeal nor the Gulf spill will be the magic issue for the GOP. Housing might be, but lets hope it is not - as this would involve much human suffering for a political gain.
Jim McCrea
7 years 6 months ago
Darned Jesuits!  Who do they think they are?  When the Republican Church in America wants their opinion, they'll ask for it.
charles jordan
7 years 6 months ago
So the Secretary of State of a foreign country is using what is in effect an 'house organ' to signal a point of view and perhaps chide that country's agents for boorish behaviour. Yes, we already know that the bishops collectively as the USCCB, and in some cases individually, fail to respect the laity's obligations and vocations in the world. Clearly Catholics who are in union with the Archbishop of Rome, currently Benedict xvi, know when bishops who should also be in union with that same Archbishop cross the pale and subsume roles that do not belong to them.

Advertisement

Don't miss the best from America

Sign up for our Newsletter to get the Jesuit perspective on news, faith and culture.

The latest from america

25,000 children and pilgrim sang the pope “Happy Birthday" today in St. Peter’s Square.
Gerard O’ConnellDecember 17, 2017
A reflection for the third Sunday of Advent
Elizabeth Kirkland CahillDecember 16, 2017
Homeless people are seen in Washington June 22. Bishop Frank J. Dewane of Venice, Fla., chair of the U.S. bishops' domestic policy committee, released a statement Nov. 17 proclaiming that the House of Representatives "ignored impacts to the poor and families" in passing the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act the previous day. (CNS photo/Tyler Orsburn)
The United States is thwarting the advancement of millions of its citizens, a UN rapporteur says.
Kevin ClarkeDecember 16, 2017
Why not tax individuals for what they take out of society instead of what they contribute?
Paul D. McNelis, S.J.December 15, 2017