Citizens' Confidence

One hears loose talk these days about a lack of “investor confidence” in the Obama administration’s ideas about resuscitating “zombie banks,” those super-conglomerates whose liabilities exceed their assets.  For “investor confidence” read willing bankers. The folks who brought on the most profound economic collapse since the Great Depression, after receiving trillions of dollars from the federal government in capital infusions, loans, guarantees and central bank facilities as they await the government’s assumption of their toxic debt, are reluctant to get the banks working again because the Obama-Geithner plan is too vague or too improvised to give them confidence in the future. Come on! Get over yourselves, guys. Economic historians tell us there are just two strategies for dealing with economic crises of this magnitude: Roosevelt II and Roosevelt I--to muddle through like F.D.R., or to bust the trusts like T.R. If they don’t like strategy I, then it should be no news that strategy II is not far off.

Bankers should be relieved that for now President Obama has chosen to follow F.D.R.’s model. If not, they should tell us what they want from Mr. Obama and the country. But then they should tell the country why we should believe in them any longer. Why should the citizenry, the ordinary taxpayers, trust them, their expectations, and their dangerously smart ideas  any more as we continue to discover each day they are still gaming the system? Up to now they have kept their fresh ideas as closely guarded as their negative balance sheets were just a few month ago. Let them speak up and win the nation’s confidence; and if they fail–and they probably will, because the titans of finance, like mainline economists, are devoid of any fresh ideas–then it is time to nationalize the banks until the state can regain the full value of its multiple subsidies.  “Better a temporary ward of the state,” concedes that hoary voice of capitalism The Economist, “than a permanent zombie.”

Advertisement

"The Lemon socialism” that in good times gives the profits to the financiers and asks the public to eat the losses in bad times is not a capitalism worth waiting to revive.  It is time for a little boy to shout out, “The emperor has no clothes,” and for the adults to get on with building a new banking system they have been too afraid or too blind to do until now.

Drew Christiansen, S.J.

Comments are automatically closed two weeks after an article's initial publication. See our comments policy for more.
9 years 9 months ago
Here on the ground, instead of on the TV, the banks are still doing their work loaning money. The recession may not be over, but what we're seeing now looks like the inevitable fallout from what went on months ago. In a couple more months, it will seem as if this all vaporized.
9 years 9 months ago
"Bankers should be relieved that for now President Obama has chosen to follow F.D.R.’s model". He's going to start a war?

Advertisement

The latest from america

In his World Day of Peace message, Pope Francis warned against the vices that are too often linked to politics today and do not build peace in society.
Gerard O’ConnellDecember 18, 2018
The request is a clear indication that children, not the reputation of the church, will be the paramount concern at this meeting.
Gerard O’ConnellDecember 18, 2018
As today’s Gospel suggests, righteousness is no guarantee of a smooth life.
Elizabeth Kirkland CahillDecember 18, 2018
The very best television is like an Ignatian contemplation: It tells stories that offer us some kind of gift—an insight or encouragement for our lives.
Jim McDermottDecember 18, 2018