Catholic Leaders Promote 'Decent Work and Just Wages'

On a day marking the 50th anniversary of Lyndon Johnson's declaration of a war on poverty, Archbishop Thomas G. Wenski of Miami, chairman of the U.S. bishops' Committee on Domestic Justice and Human Development, and Father Larry Snyder, president of Catholic Charities USA, in a letter today called on the U.S. Senate to advance policies that promote decent work and just wages. "We write to express our concern with the ongoing decent jobs crisis as well as the resulting inequality in our communities and country," Father Snyder and Archbishop Wenski said in a letter distributed among members of the Senate. "We urge you to consider closely any legislation that begins to heal our broken economy by promoting decent work and ensuring fair and just compensation for all workers."

Legislation to resume long-term unemployment insurance for 1.3 million Americans cut off at the end of 2013 cleared a key hurdle on Jan. 7 when 60 Senators, including six Republicans, voted to allow debate on the matter to proceed in the Senate. Getting such an extention through the House of Representatives may prove difficult. The issue of economic inequality and questions about the capacity of the market to respond adequately to the needs of the poor have become a hot topic for discussion around the country as the upcoming election season begins to heat up.


Pope Francis's frequent commentary on issues of inequality and solidarity has advanced the discussion globally, and Washington has not proved immune to the Francis effect. A recent report in the New York Times noted: "Francis’ denunciation of an 'economy of exclusion' goes to the heart of the debate between the two parties over the role of government. Democrats like Mr. Durbin and President Obama—whose administration is facing off against Catholic nuns in the Supreme Court over birth control provisions in his health law—quote the pope in speeches, using his words to reinforce their positions. Republicans find themselves forced to justify votes to cut food stamps and unemployment benefits even as they try to counter the perception that they are indifferent to the poor."

In their letter to the Senate, "We write not as economists or labor market experts," Father Snyder and Archbishop Wenski said, "but rather as pastors and teachers who every day, in our ministries and churches, see the pain and struggles caused by an economy that simply does not produce enough jobs with just wages. So many of our families find it increasingly difficult to afford basic needs, forcing some to take multiple jobs or, in desperation, even seek out predatory loans."

Noting that "Human work has inherent dignity, and just wages honor that dignity," the two national Catholic leaders write that the current federal minimum wage fails “to provide sufficient resources for individuals to form and support families,”  concluding in their letter that it does not meet the standard for just wages as set out in the Catechism of the Catholic Church. 

They also point out that “a full-year, full-time worker making the minimum wage does not make enough money to raise a child free from poverty. Because the minimum wage is a static number and does not change, each year it becomes more difficult for workers making the minimum wage to survive. . . . Workers deserve a just wage that allows them to live in dignity, form and support families, and contribute to the common good.”

The letter cites Pope Francis's recent appeal to "remove centrality from the law of profit and gain and to put the person and the common good back at the center," the importance of work in in the "authentic promotion of the person," a task "incumbent on the society as a whole.”

Father Snyder and Archbishop Wenski conclude, "We must return the human person to the center of economic life; one way Congress can do that is by ensuring workers receive just wages."

Comments are automatically closed two weeks after an article's initial publication. See our comments policy for more.
J Cabaniss
5 years 2 months ago
"We write not as economists or labor market experts"Given that Bishop Wenski and Father Snyder recognize their deficiencies in the area of economics it is fair to ask how they can justify recommending a particular solution to economic problems. Beyond that is the question of how they justify stepping into the middle of a political issue and, by the simple fact that they are members of the clergy, implying that one position (and by extension, one party) is more moral than the other. It is one thing to bring attention to the plight of those suffering economic hardships and to exhort Congress to tailor policies to help the most needy, but it is quite another thing to suggest what those policies should be. We are not well served when bishops engage in politics.
Joseph J Dunn
5 years 2 months ago
The letter by Archbishop Wenski and Father Snyder is timely in view of the "pain and struggles caused by an economy that simply does not produce enough jobs with just wages." While the writers initially urge the Senate to "consider closely any legislation...promoting decent work and ensuring fair and just compensation for all workers," they then focus exclusively on raising the minimum wage as the remedy. Our nation's unemployment and under-employment problems are quite real, and extend far beyond minimum-wage jobs. So must the remedy. The only way to produce more "decent jobs that pay a just wage" on which one can raise a family (something far beyond today's minimum wage) is to promote new jobs in new private sector industries. There is an argument that raising the minimum wage would allow those workers to spend more and thereby promote economic growth, at least marginally. But I know of no economic argument that raising the minimum wage would solve the problem that the writers address in their opening paragraph. No doubt, the writers are focused on helping the poor, including the working-poor. But raising the minimum wage to a "just wage" that allows raising a family (let's use the $15/hour figure that some suggest) will have significant consequences perhaps not anticipated by the writers. Some workers may be replaced by machinery. But the much larger risk may be drawing more people who currently ignore the job market to seek entry-level jobs. Picture the middle-class grandmother, teenager, or college student who is not interested in a job at $7.25/hour, but decides to go to work when the same low-stress, easy-training job pays $15/hour. Bringing so many new applicants into the stagnant market for low-skilled jobs will not help the poor. A minor adjustment in the minimum wage, perhaps to adjust for inflation since the last increase, might be helpful, although it does not achieve the living wage desired by the writers. A better approach to addressing the problem they highlight would be to encourage policies that promote investment and legitimate risk-taking. The writers do not seek to "speak to the specifics of policies." But pressing for investment and job-creation may be just as important to the poor and working-poor as changing the minimum wage into a living wage, with much less risk to them.
james brown
4 years 11 months ago
Now most of the people do the jobs in various sectors but they can't get their payment properly and as per their work so these type of things create more problem for them. So how can every people get their wage properly is most important, every government declare the minimum wages for everybody and how can every people develop by their work.


The latest from america

Before long I had tears in my eyes—and not from the uneven grooves worn into the wood by pilgrims’ knees. Something about the physical discomfort helped me to focus on the much greater pain Jesus had felt on those same stairs.
Over against our human unreliability stand the rock-solid assurances of God.
The latest survey, conducted in January, found that 44 percent of white Catholics approve of President Trump’s job performance.
Today and everyday we are invited to pray with the psalmist.