The Bishop’s Children

This week’s New Yorker includes an excellent letter from three of Bishop Paul Moore’s children, responding to their sister’s article "outing" their father in the March 3 issue. I also found Honor Moore’s article distasteful; a few scenes felt too choreographed, almost as if they were played out because they would make good set pieces in a New Yorker article. Bishop Moore’s children take issue with "’outing’ a man whose public legacy is great, whose private life he chose to keep private, and whose personal agony often estranged him from many of us who loved him":
We wonder if a history inclusive of gay men, lesbians, and, yes, bisexuals can only be made and understood by delving into the closely held secrets of those who have come before us, especially those who clung fiercely to the closet. Doesn’t it matter, even when someone is dead, that his most fervently held private life, and the unnecessarily explicit details of his marriage, are exposed against his wishes? We believe that it does matter, and that both of our parents’ good legacies have been damaged.
More letters here. Tim Reidy
Comments are automatically closed two weeks after an article's initial publication. See our comments policy for more.

Advertisement

The latest from america

Catherine Pakaluk, who currently teaches at the Catholic University of America and holds a Ph.D. in Economics from Harvard University, describes her tweet to Mr. Macron as “spirited” and “playful.”
Emma Winters October 19, 2018
A new proposal from the Department of Homeland Security could make it much more difficult for legal immigrants to get green cards in the United States. But even before its implementation, the proposal has led immigrants to avoid receiving public benefits.
J.D. Long-GarcíaOctober 19, 2018
 Archbishop Carlo Maria Vigano, then nuncio to the United States, and then-Cardinal Theodore E. McCarrick of Washington, are seen in a combination photo during the beatification Mass of Blessed Miriam Teresa Demjanovich at the Cathedral Basilica of the Sacred Heart in Newark, N.J., Oct. 4, 2014. (CNS photo/Gregory A. Shemitz)
In this third letter Archbishop Viganò no longer insists, as he did so forcefully in his first letter, that the restrictions that he claimed Benedict XVI had imposed on Archbishop McCarrick—one he alleges that Pope Francis later lifted—can be understood as “sanctions.”
Gerard O’ConnellOctober 19, 2018
Kevin Clarke tells us about his reporting from Iraq.
Olga SeguraOctober 19, 2018