(Links fixed). Here are two profiles (both sympathetic) of two church leaders whose approach to dialogue and authority will be key factors in the ongoing Vatican review of the Leadership Conference of Women Religious. The first is a short piece in the Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel on Florence Deacon, OSF, the president-elect of the LCWR. The second, a longer piece by John L. Allen, Jr., in the National Catholic Reporter, is a profile of Bishop J. Peter Sartain, bishop of Seattle, who has been charged by the Vatican to be the "apostolic delegate" to the LCWR as it begins its reform.
Bishop Sartain and LCWR Leader Profiled
The latest from america
Whoever is elected as the next pope, one thing is certain: The church does not belong to him.
“He owes an apology,” Bishop Thomas Paprocki said after President Trump posted an image that appeared to be created by A.I. depicting himself as pope.
“We depend on the press to know who the candidates are, because names are not something we really talk about in there—perhaps only in small groups. This is not a parliament.”
The influence of the Synod on Synodality for the conclave—and what the result of the conclave might mean for the future of synodality
Sounds like an ok thing to me but I had just never heard of it before. I could see where lay men or women could decide to form some association in order to do good works and promote Catholic values. Is this common? Would something like the Knights of Columbus be like this or other organizations that one often associates with Catholic charities?
LCWR seems to know how to pull this trick off. Sounds like maybe Sartain does too.
CMSWR stands for Catholic Major Superiors of Women Religious. Here's their site: CMSWR.org
The median age of the LCWR sister is 70 and their orders are not growing. I suspect that there are many nuns and sisters true to Church teaching who are trapped in LCWR affiliated orders who have gone of the deep end and who are relieved that this is happening.