Bishop Charges Drone Policy Raises 'Serious Moral Concerns'

Speaking on behalf of the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops, the chairman of the USCCB's Committee on International Justice and Peace said the Obama administration's policy of targeted killings by drones raise “serious moral questions,” including concerns related to discrimination, imminence of threat, proportionality and probability of success. Bishop Richard E. Pates of Des Moines, Iowa, said the the United States should publicly discuss and scrutinize its policy of targeted killings by unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), or drones, in order formulate “a more comprehensive, moral and effective policy to resist terrorism." Bishop Pate's comments anticipate a scheduled Thursday night address by President Obama during which, White House officials say, he will explain the legal framework behind the decisions he makes to use drones against terrorist threats and further detail the administration’s counterterrorism policy.

"An effective counterterrorism policy should employ non-military assets to build peace through respect for human rights and addressing underlying injustices that terrorists unscrupulously exploit,” Bishop Pates wrote, in a May 17 letter to National Security Adviser Thomas Donilon. “Targeted killing should, by definition, be highly discriminatory,” wrote Bishop Pates. “The Administration’s policy appears to extend the use of deadly force to alleged ‘signature’ attacks and reportedly classifies all males of a certain age as combatants. Are these policies morally defensible? They seem to violate the law of war, international human rights law, and moral norms.”


Bishop Pates acknowledged the right of a country to use force in self-defense but argued that counterterrorism, even against an organization as dangerous as Al Qaeda, is primarily a law enforcement activity when it takes place outside of a war zone. The bishop also acknowledged the importance of protecting American lives and the danger posed by an organization like Al Qaeda, but said the relative low cost and ease of using drones might tempt U.S. leadership to use them to excess, causing our nation to underutilize “economic, political and diplomatic responses.” He urged attention to the “longer-term social and political impacts of targeted killings by drones on the struggle against terrorism.”

“And doesn’t the prospect of widespread deployment of UAVs by other nations and non-state actors put a spotlight on our nation as the primary developer and user of UAV armed and unarmed technology?” he wrote. “The U.S. should exercise leadership in advancing international norms, standards and restrictions for their use.”

In sharing the correspondence with all of the bishops, Bishop Pates noted the letter addresses the morality of U.S. policy; it does not question the moral integrity of those charged with carrying it out. Bishop Pates' letter was also sent to the leadership of the House and Senate Committees on Armed Services, Foreign Affairs, Foreign Relations, Homeland Security and Government Affairs, Judiciary, Oversight and Government Reform and the Select and Permanent Select Committees on Intelligence.

The full text of Bishop Pates’ letter is available here.


Comments are automatically closed two weeks after an article's initial publication. See our comments policy for more.
Bob Baker
5 years 2 months ago
Terrorism is where you find it. Anymore, defining a "war zone" is also problematic. "An effective counterterrorism policy should employ non-military assets to build peace through respect for human rights and addressing underlying injustices that terrorists unscrupulously exploit” - obviously the bishop has no idea who we are fighting and how he knows what is or isn't an effective counterterrorism policy can only be surmised. This must be the season for the USCCB to issue reports, there seem to be so many lately. This one, I suggest, is outside the bounds of the bishop's purview. Militant Islam must be fought where you find it and if a UAV/RPV saves an American unit from engaging in combat (even outside a "war zone" because they'll be the ones called upon to deal it), then so be it.


The latest from america

So what does it matter what a celibate woman thinks about contraception?
Helena BurnsJuly 20, 2018
Former US President Barack Obama gestures to the crowd, during an event in Kogelo, Kisumu, Kenya, Monday, July 16, 2018. (AP Photo Brian Inganga)
In Johannesburg, Obama gave what some commentators consider his most important speech since he vacated the Oval Office.
Anthony EganJuly 20, 2018
With his "Mass," Leonard Bernstein uses liturgy to give voice to political unease.
Kevin McCabeJuly 20, 2018
Cardinal Theodore E. McCarrick, retired archbishop of Washington, arrives for the Jan. 6 installation Mass of Cardinal Joseph W. Tobin at the Cathedral Basilica of the Sacred Heart in Newark, N.J. (CNS photo/Bob Roller)
Women often “bring up the voice of those who are the most vulnerable in our society,” says Hans Zollner, S.J., who heads the Centre for Child Protection in Rome.