Beyond Race?

Since the election of Barack Obama as president, many people are asking, Has the United States moved beyond race? Couched within the question is a hope that if we can move past race in the way we see each other, we might move beyond racism as well. The question shows up in the media, in the blogosphere and on the street. And it was discussed at a recent panel in New York City sponsored by Harvard alumni, with commentators Frank Rich (New York Times) and David Frum (American Enterprise Institute) and two political science professors who specialize in African-American studies: Jennifer Hochschild (Harvard) and Frederick C. Harris (Columbia). (View video clips from the panel here.)

Four points by the panelists stand out and ought to be discussed by many Americans in churches, classrooms, and around the dinner table as well as in public forums.

Advertisement

First, can we envision what a post-racial society would look like? Would politics without racial prejudice become less contentious or more so? Would identity politics persist, only based on categories other than race? Such questions are key because until we can set a common goal and identify its parameters, we as a society cannot gauge progress or acknowledge success. Will we even know a post-racial society when we see it?

Second, demography determines the future. The U.S., no longer divided simply along black/white racial lines, is a multiracial society composed of multiracial individuals (like our president). That has to be a given in our thinking as a society, meaning that we have to begin from the facts today, not from any previous understanding of how our society is composed. To future generations of Americans, today’s black/white concerns will seem very outdated. Demography also means that the debate will change regardless of how well we understand or discuss it; demographic shifts are beyond any individual’s control.

Third, evaluations of racial progress may not reach a consensus for decades. That is because a person’s understanding of race is conditioned largely by his or her particular generation: how did racial groups interact formally and informally, write its laws, protest any limitations, make improvements in race relations, and so on. How much commingling was there? That is the kind of thing that forms a generation. In a multigenerational society like ours, these various understandings and experiences coexist and make communication complex. People tend to speak from their own generational understanding of how things are, were, and should be.

Fourth, while race alone no longer says much about a particular person’s chances of succeeding in the U.S., the addition of class to race makes for a much better predictor. Some experts think, for example, that blacks with incomes in the nation’s top third or half experience a post-racial society (or nearly so) now. Yet that is not the case for lower-income blacks, whose race is still seen as both primary and determinative. In other words, some people can experience a post-racial society before others do; change does not come equally to all at the same historical moment.

My hope in passing on some of the discussion at the Harvard Club, is to stimulate further discussion among readers. High quality civil discussion on this topic  can help to frame the issues and bring together people of many races, all of whom have a stake in hastening post-racial progress.

Karen Sue Smith

Comments are automatically closed two weeks after an article's initial publication. See our comments policy for more.
8 years 8 months ago
The fourth observation is very astute. A similar conclusion can be drawn regarding religion in Ulster. Middle class families do not quarrel about religion in Ulster, it is the working class where the troubles are acute.
8 years 8 months ago
I think the comments about class and race are very true. The election of President Obama has caused some commentators to declare rather excitably that America has got over the race divide, or is a post-racist society. Certainly it is a good thing that Obama has shown that being an African American is no bar to America's highest office but ... but, Obama is an atypical of many African Americans. He was born to middle-class parents, had an upbringing which took him to such varied places as Indonesia and Hawaii and was privately educated. Working class African Americans are far less likely to achieve such career heights as are working class white Americans and working class Hispanic Americans. The dominant theme is class as the determinant of social mobility. That is one thing which hasn't gone away.
8 years 8 months ago
I hope the panel included some people who classify themselves as multiracial.
8 years 8 months ago
Speaking of our President, I am wondering in relation to race and this topic how many comments to In All Things and to other moderated Catholic web logs are rejected due to the use of racial epithets. Have all the commenters been on their best behavior or has the life of the blogmaster gotten more interesting since the election of our new President?

Advertisement

Don't miss the best from America

Sign up for our Newsletter to get the Jesuit perspective on news, faith and culture.

The latest from america

Images: CNS/Composite: America
On Nov. 11, the Catholic Church lost a moral titan in the long struggle for racial equality and justice in the United States.
Shannen Dee WilliamsNovember 22, 2017
Senior Gen. Min Aung Hlaing, Myanmar military commander-in-chief, speaks during the Union Peace Conference Aug. 31 in Naypyitaw (CNS photo/Hein Htet, EPA).
Gen. Min Aung Hlaing wields great political power in the country.
Jacob Tremblay and Julia Roberts in “Wonder” (CNS photo/Lionsgate). 
‘Wonder’ is a tween melodrama on a mission of mercy.
Simcha FisherNovember 22, 2017
The change was in “no way” a response to the C.C.H.D.’s persistent online critics, an archdiocesan official says.
Kevin ClarkeNovember 22, 2017