Another "Pro-Life" Movie?

The new movie, "4 Months, 3 Weeks, 2 Days," about an illegal abortion in Romania during its communist era, won the prestigious Palme d’Or at the Cannes Film Festival this year. The New York Times, in a rave review, said that that Christian Mungiu’s new work "deserves to be seen by the largest audience possible, partly because it offers a welcome alternative to the coy, trivializing attitude toward abortion now in vogue in American fiction films." Too highbrow a recommendation for you? Okay. Entertainment Weekly calls it "...one of the very best movies of 2007...a masterpiece." So when a Jesuit friend asked if I wanted to see this "masterpiece" this weekend, I readily agreed. It’s hard to say no to a movie that had the adjectives "brilliant" and "startingly good" (the BBC, among others) applied to it. So imagine my surprise when I found it to be only good. It made me wonder whether the same adjectives would be applied were the perceived "message" different. The movie tracks the tragic progress of two college roommates scraping by in 1980s Romania. One, a mousy sad woman, is pregnant and is seeking an abortion. The other, her more resourceful friend, tries mightily to borrow enough funds to pay for an illegal abortion. Without giving away the ending, I can say that the movie is unreservedly bleak, and graphic: at one point, one sees a fetus on a bathroom floor. It is horrid sight. The New York Times was clearly on point with the observation that this is not a "coy, trivializing attitude." Yet after the movie ended I wondered what all the fuss was about. Other low-budget movies were equally gritty, boasted equally good performances, showcased equally good camera angles, and featured equally good dialogue. I wonder how much of the adulation of reviewers (and the judges at Cannes) stemmed from what they may have perceived as the "message" of the movie: i.e., illegal abortions are bad, so legal ones must be good. For me, the movie was a litany of the horrors of any abortion, and as much a "pro-life" movie as "Juno," which I had seen the day before. How can observing a lifeless fetus make one anything but pro-life? "4 Months... Official Site" James Martin, SJ
Comments are automatically closed two weeks after an article's initial publication. See our comments policy for more.

Advertisement

The latest from america

Catherine Pakaluk, who currently teaches at the Catholic University of America and holds a Ph.D. in Economics from Harvard University, describes her tweet to Mr. Macron as “spirited” and “playful.”
Emma Winters October 19, 2018
A new proposal from the Department of Homeland Security could make it much more difficult for legal immigrants to get green cards in the United States. But even before its implementation, the proposal has led immigrants to avoid receiving public benefits.
J.D. Long-GarcíaOctober 19, 2018
 Archbishop Carlo Maria Vigano, then nuncio to the United States, and then-Cardinal Theodore E. McCarrick of Washington, are seen in a combination photo during the beatification Mass of Blessed Miriam Teresa Demjanovich at the Cathedral Basilica of the Sacred Heart in Newark, N.J., Oct. 4, 2014. (CNS photo/Gregory A. Shemitz)
In this third letter Archbishop Viganò no longer insists, as he did so forcefully in his first letter, that the restrictions that he claimed Benedict XVI had imposed on Archbishop McCarrick—one he alleges that Pope Francis later lifted—can be understood as “sanctions.”
Gerard O’ConnellOctober 19, 2018
Kevin Clarke tells us about his reporting from Iraq.
Olga SeguraOctober 19, 2018