Gerald J. Beyer
Catholics and the Rise of Barack Obama
Image

The election of the first African-American president undoubtedly represents a milestone along the road to Martin Luther King Jr.'s "beloved community.” Yet we must not be tempted to think that racism and discrimination no longer preclude many people from full participation in American society.

Some pundits are hastily proclaiming that President Barack Obama's victory proves that we are a "post-racial” nation, one in which race no longer matters. The election results are encouraging. More whites, including more young white voters and more poor white voters, voted for Barack Obama in 2008 than voted for John Kerry in 2004. But John McCain, the G.O.P. nominee, garnered 55 percent of the vote among all whites, and some whites openly declared they would not vote for a black candidate. The election of the first black president, although a cause for joy, did not dismantle racism in one fell swoop. Even if the scope of the problem has diminished, no one should deny that our nation has yet to confront fully its legacy of racism.

The Catholic Response

Catholics are not immune from the need to address racism in the United States. Barack Obama's thoughtful, carefully nuanced speech delivered in Philadelphia on March 18, 2008, should have sparked long-overdue discussions on race in Roman Catholic parishes, schools, institutions and families across Amer ica. Yet this did not happen widely, and most parishes still do not recognize racism for the threat that it is to the unity of the people of God. Instead of a meaningful conversation about race among Catholics in the final months of the campaign, disheartening reports were published in the media about Catholics who would not vote for any black presidential candidate. To be clear, Catholics of good conscience could certainly find legitimate reasons not to vote for Obama. As Bishop Blase Cupich prophetically declared in these pages, however, "to allow racism to reign in our hearts and to determine our choice in this solemn moment for our nation is to cooperate with one of the great evils that has afflicted our society” (Am., 10/27/08).

In recent decades the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops, organizations like Catholic Charities USA and contemporary Roman Catholic theologians have produced important works on racism. Barack Obama's assessment of race and American life and his proposals to remedy its problems strikingly resemble those of the bishops and other Catholic thinkers. Given this convergence, Catholics should heed President Obama's call to overcome our nation's painful past and its persistent racism and discrimination.

The Evil of Racism: The Status Quo

Barack Obama's description of the state of affairs in the United States echoes what the U.S. bishops stated in their pastoral letter Brothers and Sisters to Us (1979) and reiterated in a research report on the occasion of the 25th anniversary of that letter. President Obama recognizes that much progress has been made over the last several decades. He believes that the uniqueness and greatness of the United States has allowed Americans of African descent like himself to succeed. Yet he maintains that injustices against African-Americans and other minorities perdure and that much work remains to be done to make the American dream possible for all Americans. In Obama's view, the educational achievement gap between black and white students stems from the inferior schools that many African-Americans were and still are forced to attend. The wealth and income gap between blacks and whites can be attributed to the numerous forms of discrimination that blacks historically experienced, like lack of access to loans and mortgages for African-American business owners and families and systemic exclusion from employment and unions.

Today, many African-Americans lack economic opportunities, which places a strain on their families and communities. Many black communities are without basic services and amenities like parks and police protection that most middle-class Americans take for granted. Obama also contends that the racially charged events in Jena, La., in 2008 revealed "glaring inequalities in our justice system,” including unfairly harsh penalties for first-time nonviolent offenders. Obama implied in a speech at Howard University in 2007 that these unjust sentences are disproportionately meted out to minorities. He also decried racial profiling and the attempt by the Justice Department under George W. Bush to eliminate affirmative action programs at American institutions of higher learning. Mr. Obama concluded that "profound institutional barriers” preclude many Americans from among all races from having equal access to good schools, productive jobs and health care.

The U.S. Catholic bishops’ assessment is similar. In 1979 the bishops wrote that racism is an evil that "endures in our society and in our church.” They called for a number of measures to be taken within the church and more broadly in American society to combat racism. They urged all Catholics, for example, to reflect on their personal racial biases and to do everything in their power to eliminate this "radical evil” that generates unjust and oppressive social structures.

Unfortunately, the bishops’ own update and report in 2004 revealed that racism is still not widely discussed in the church. Only 36 percent of Roman Catholics in the United States reported that they had heard a homily that addressed racism, and only 18 percent of bishops have issued statements in their dioceses concerning racism. The report also found white Catholics more opposed to public policies designed to attenuate racial inequality than they were in the past. The report expressed concern that while blacks were increasingly represented in leadership positions within the church, more effort had to be made to boost minority representation among staff at all levels of church ministries. This remains a particularly urgent task, given that many of the church's social ministries serve groups made up predominantly of minorities.

In pastoral letters and statements, some individual bishops have unequivocally condemned the sin of racism. In 1998, for example, Cardinal Anthony Bevilacqua of Philadelphia published a pastoral letter, Healing Racism through Faith and Truth, in which he referred to racism as an "intrinsic evil” that impedes one's ability to love God, since one cannot love God if one does not love all of God's children. The cardinal leveled a stinging critique: "Our American history from its inception, tragically, has been influenced by the historical circumstance that an exception was made. The flawed concept that "all men except’ was adopted in practice. Some among us were not to be considered equal. A distinction based on race was set in motion in American life. This distinction in many and varied guises has remained a sin deeply rooted in American life.”

Cardinal Francis George of Chicago has described the entrenched forms of racism that characterize contemporary American life. In his 2001 pastoral letter Dwell in My Love, he addresses primarily four types. Spatial racism is the creation of "patterns of metropolitan development” by whites through which they cordon themselves off in affluent suburbs or gentrified urban areas far removed from blighted neighborhoods where mostly poor African-Americans and other minorities reside. Institutional racism manifests itself in institutions created by whites it privileges a white Anglo-American cultural and racial perspective and "ignores the contributions of other peoples and cultures.” Like Barack Obama, Cardinal George and his brother bishops are concerned that minorities "are often treated more harshly than other citizens in their encounters with the criminal justice system.” The dearth of minority leaders and the devaluation of their cultures in American institutions often give rise to the third type of contemporary racism, according to George: internalized racism. This occurs when members of minority groups adopt the negative stereotypes about themselves that have been perpetuated by the majority. Finally, individual racism is a conscious, personal bias that infects the hearts of people who perpetuate racist attitudes through racial slurs, hate crimes and other more subtle means.

Barack Obama's words and the bishops’ teaching on the persistence of racism in the United States largely mirror one another, and their analyses are confirmed by statistics. Catholic Charities USA recently released a study titled Poverty and Racism: Overlapping Threats to the Common Good, which contends that Hurricane Katrina unveiled the too-frequently disguised poor in the United States, who remain largely unnoticed as a result of racism. The catastrophe also spotlighted the historic injustices that "advance the welfare of white Americans and impede the opportunities of persons of color,” including institutionalized slavery, the "separate but equal doctrine,” which created inferior educational institutions, the legal exclusion of African-Americans from unions and "redlining.” Redlining, in which the Federal Housing Administration engaged during the 1940s and 1950s, granted 98 percent of mortgage loans to whites, denying blacks one of the primary means of generating wealth in this country.

These and other racial injustices led to the "state-sanctioned unjust impoverishment” of blacks and other minorities, which continues. Today 33 percent of African-American children live in poverty, 28 percent of Latino children and 27 percent of Native American children by contrast, 10 percent of white children live in poverty. The most extreme poverty afflicts geographic areas populated mainly by minorities. White families possess on average 10 times more wealth than do families of color. This "wealth gap” has grown since 1998, with white families enjoying a 20 percent boost in their net worth, while African-American families have seen their wealth decrease. This stems in part from inequalities in the workplace, where white males occupy more than 90 percent of executive corporate positions. As the Catholic ethicist Barbara Hilkert Andolsen has noted, unemployment rates rose among blacks during the economic recovery from 2001 to 2005-some of the rise attributable to overt racism. Studies show that job candidates with "names that sounded black, such as Lakisha Washington or Jamal Jones” are 50 percent less likely to be given a job interview than are white candidates with similar credentials.

Dismantling Racism, Building the Kingdom

Although President Obama has lamented the failure of Americans to eradicate many of the injustices African-Americans still face in the United States, he distanced himself from his pastor, the Rev. Jeremiah Wright, with what is called in Christian theology a "strong” doctrine of grace. In his speech in Philadelphia, Obama maintained that Rev. Wright had erred in claiming that racism is endemic to the United States in the sense that the incorrigibility of white oppressors will continue to breed racial oppression because they and the system they dominate cannot change. In theological terms, this is tantamount to stating that God's grace cannot overcome the propensity of white oppressors to keep their black brothers and sisters down.

In Obama's view, however, some of the shackles of prejudice have already been broken. Theologically, he appears to see God's grace already at work in the conversion of many whites and in the gradual improvement of society. Obama maintains the hope that racism will eventually be purged from America. Anyone who reads his speeches or books, however, understands that Obama knows this will be an arduous task. The president has proposed measures to move us toward this goal. Among them are more vigorous enforcement of civil rights by the Department of Justice, rectifying inequities caused by pay discrimination, ensuring that children of minorities and the poor have good educational opportunities, the elimination of racial disparities in the judicial system and fair access to credit for minorities.

Obama's hopeful stance on racism resembles the best thinking in Catholic theology on the powerful presence of sin in the world and the ability of God's grace to overcome it through the action of the Holy Spirit, working in and through God's children. This teaching is beautifully expressed in the "Pastoral Constitution on the Church in the Modern World” (Gaudium et Spes). Here the bishops of the Second Vatican Council describe human activity infected by sin but "purified and perfected by the power of Christ's Cross and Resurrection.” They contend that creating a more just and peaceful society contributes to the building of the kingdom of God. In other words, with the aid of God's grace, "we shall overcome.”

The U.S. bishops also translate this Catholic optimism into specific policies, resembling those of Obama. Cardinal George, for example, urged fair access to decent housing and credit for minorities, good schools, "equal pay and employment for women and minorities,” an equitable justice system and "voting for public officials committed to racial and systemic justice.” And Archbishop Harry Flynn of St. Paul and Minneapolis argued in 2003 that we can and must address the many "root causes” of racism and promote the economic and social rights of the poor, thereby enabling minorities to participate fully in society. Succinctly stated, both Obama and the bishops believe in the power of humans to be instruments of change, aided by God's grace. Would that all Americans recognize the work that still needs to be done and affirm our ability to do it.

Gerald J. Beyer is assistant professor of theology at Saint Joseph's University, Philadelphia, Pa.

Comments

Jennifer Ghigliotti | 5/15/2009 - 5:45pm
I've read stuff before in America that I did not agree with but after today this magazine will not come in our home again. My daughter after reading this asked me if I hated her and her father because they are part or mostly Hispanic and I'm white. I had to sit down and read this and then explain to her that there are racist of all colors, not all white people are hateful or evil, and that while racism still exist many people who claim to be the victims of racism embrace cultures of violence, gangs, welfare, etc. and in doing so create there own poor situations. My husband and I were poor college students living on 12,000 dollars and we worked our way up. There are opportunities for minorities my husband received many grants for his education simply because he was Hispanic. This article fails to mention a very widespread culture that is morally bankrupt amongst Americas black and Hispanic cultures that contributes to the problems stated in the article.
david hennessy | 5/13/2009 - 10:33am
To have opposed the election of President Obama on racial grounds was foolishness and evil of the highest order. For a Catholic of any race to have supported his election when he clearly stated his position and intent on issues of life was folly that will negatively impact the cause of the unborn globally for generations. The President did not attempt to fool anyone. Those "Catholics" who supported him may have fooled themselves. Is it possible to be a Catholic and be pro-choice? Is it possible that the culture of death is so deeply ingrained in our culture that we have deluded ourselves?
Christopher Mulcahy | 5/10/2009 - 9:01pm
Racism--this tottering tower of liberal rhetoric is swaying violently and soon will fall utterly. No doubt slavery, redlining, (the author forgot the vote tax) and name-calling were once moral evils. Today excusing anyone from personal responsibility for education, career, and acquisition of social and economic skills is a moral evil. Yes, vestiges of racism remain. But the Sixties are over for hippies, Red Guards, & lib baby-boomers, even the clerical kind. It's time for all of us to get real and make real things happen. The old excuses are now themselves immoral.
Christopher Mulcahy | 5/9/2009 - 8:30am
One of the most pernicious forms of racism commonly perpetrated by liberals is behavior that denies African Americans personal responsibility for their actions. Were I black, I would prefer KKK neighbors to those who patronized my children by failing to hold them responsible for what they do, or presuming they need special programs in order to participate fully in American life. This condescension has now become one of the root causes of racism in American life.
William Rydberg | 5/8/2009 - 9:29pm
There are so many hyphens in this article that it makes me want to barf! The American Curch has hidden behind hyphenated Catholicism for too long. This has to stop! We are all Catholics not hyphenated Catholic. I would have the thought the American Jesuit Society of Jesus would know better than to play do this in America Magazine.
Joe Evancho | 5/8/2009 - 7:29pm
Obama’s hopeful stance on racism resembles the best thinking in Catholic theology on the powerful presence of sin in the world and the ability of God’s grace to overcome it through the action of the Holy Spirit, working in and through God’s children. If Professor Byer is so taken with Obama's thinking on racism as being in tune with Catholic theology, what about his position on abortion and infanticide and embryonic stem cell research? That's just for starters.
Claire McDonough | 5/8/2009 - 6:26pm
Jesus told us that whatever we do to the least of his brethren we do to him. An old hymn reminds us that "Who serves my Father as a son is surely kin to me." So why do we keep doing such dumb things? Maybe because we see the bigotry splinter in our neighbor's eye but ignore the beam in our own.
LEONARD VILLA | 5/8/2009 - 4:57pm
In many ways the election of John Kennedy and the election of Barrack Obama raise similar concerns about identity politics. In 1960, especially after the Kennedy assurances before Baptist ministers that his Catholic faith would not influence the conduct of his presidency,(the Kenendy-example has been toxic for Catholics in public life) there was a suspicion that if you didn't vote for the Catholic this was due to visceral anti-Catholicism. Similarly there were folks who didn't vote for Barrack Obama because they were viscerally racist but I suggest this was a distinct minority. There were black folks who voted for Obama because he was not white period. The argument that some (many liberals?) make that if a white didn't vote for the black candidate, this carries a presumption of racism is itself racism. Color is not supposed to matter. I suggest that the majority of folks who voted against Obama did so because Obama is a liberal with ties to the extreme left. They don't share his poltical philosophy. I suggest that the majority of black voters who voted for Obama did so out of racial pride and solidarity and because black political leadership is lopsidedly left-liberal. Moreover if you are going to continue the converstation on race then black racism has to be on the table as well as white racism and the whole race industry. If its simply going to be left-wing, liberal talking-points about race, this is going nowhere.
Paul Howard | 5/8/2009 - 4:56pm
I believe that the figure of 55% of white Catholics who voted for John McCain needs further delineation - e.g. what percentage of men, of women? age cohorts? Did other issues cause some Catholics to reject President Obama, e.g. anti-abortion, hawkish positions on the war in Iraq or Afghanistan?
leonard nugent | 5/8/2009 - 4:54pm
Dr. Alveda King, the niece of Martin Luther King Jr. and pastoral associate of Priests for Life would say that no one, white or black or any other race should have voted for President Obama. I do concede that their opponents were horrid. Other than that Mrs. Lincoln how did you enjoy the play.
Michael Appleton | 5/8/2009 - 2:17pm
Thank you for a very wise and thoughtful article. Although many people have indeed trumpeted the election results as proof that we have entered a "post-racial" period, the election has also brought into sharp relief sizable pockets of entrenched racial hatred in this country. There was isolated evidence of this during the campaign and it remains an enduring presence in the southeastern United States, ironically the only remaining bastion of strong Republican dominance, a consequence of that party's election strategies dating back to the days of aggressive civil rights legislation.
John McShane | 5/8/2009 - 2:02pm
If racism exists, it is because it is politically or socially advantageous. I live in a parish with all races, and there is no bigotry. But I look at Los Angeles and see reverse bigotry by those who plead racism. I think it is about time to end being apologists for political racism and coach those who 'think' they are victims to assert and insert themselves into the mainstreem without looking daily into a mirror. The tone of this article would allow that mirror to always be present. Enough.