The National Catholic Review

One of the more interesting aspects of the Catholic Church’s involvement in civic life is that it cannot be comfortably placed anywhere along the left-right political spectrum (at least in an American context).

Just days ago, I posted about Pope Benedict’s widely-reported comments on same-sex marriage that riled liberals and heartened some conservatives. Yesterday, the Pope offered some words on economic matters that might make some conservatives uncomfortable and perhaps excite some on the left. From Reuters:

Pope Benedict said in his New Year's message on Tuesday he hoped 2013 would be a year of peace and that the world was under threat from unbridled capitalism, terrorism and criminality.

The 85-year-old pope rang in the new year with a mass for about 10,000 people in St Peter's Basilica on the day the Roman Catholic Church marks its World Day of Peace with initiatives around the world.

According to the Vatican’s website, he said, specifically:

Although the world is sadly marked by “hotbeds of tension and conflict caused by growing instances of inequality between rich and poor, by the prevalence of a selfish and individualistic mindset which also finds expression in an unregulated financial capitalism,” as well as by various forms of terrorism and crime, I am convinced that “the many different efforts at peacemaking which abound in our world testify to mankind’s innate vocation to peace. In every person the desire for peace is an essential aspiration which coincides in a certain way with the desire for a full, happy and successful human life. In other words, the desire for peace corresponds to a fundamental moral principle, namely, the duty and right to an integral social and communitarian development, which is part of God’s plan for mankind. Man is made for the peace which is God’s gift.

This is hardly the first time Pope Benedict has critiqued free-market economies. In 2009, he called for a new global political entity to oversee the growing gulf between the rich and the poor.

Michael J. O’Loughlin

Comments

Patrick Veale | 1/5/2013 - 3:25pm

While the growing economic inequality is obvious to everyone, it would be more important for the Pope to begin his emancipatory journey with a critique of the inequality of power in the hierarchical Church. This obvious inequality makes it impossible for the Church to speak to economic inequality in the city of woman/man. That's where Jesus started out.

James Murrray | 1/10/2013 - 2:02pm

I really want to like the guy but the inconsistencies regarding Church inequality are so glaring that it makes looking at the Pope's pronouncements as churlish criticism. The guy's right in his comments but hard to take seriously with his own human rights failure. Does he read comments such as these?

Michael Starks | 1/4/2013 - 8:59am

The Pope didn't discuss what was both good and about inequality, which would have been a critique, like a book review. He criticized inequality.

john andrechak | 1/2/2013 - 11:51pm

what I want for the Church is to oppose inequality, rampant capitalism, etal in proportion to its opposition to gay marriage. So the Diocese in Maine could spend the reported 3/4 million, send DVDs out to each member, appoint parish captions to visit each household as it did in opposing gay marriage int.

Alexander Lim | 1/8/2013 - 4:19am

While I agree with your comment about oppostion to inequality - this being a rather thorny issue for both Church and State - I cannot see the Pope speaking against Capitalism - the opposite of which would be Socialism. The erstwhile Communist countries have seen the failure of this experiment - and they're becoming more capiltalistic than we are. In fact, America is now headed into Socialism, remain in denial if you must, but "redistribution" of wealth is on its way ! I don't believe that the Church would deem this as an appropiate action.
Shockingly though, there was a report some two years ago, about a priest, who, during his homily, suggested that parishioners who are in dire need, can shop-lift BUT only from places the likes of Walmart and not from Mom and Pop stores, Furthermore, he added that they should take only what are necessary and not be "greedy". This has bothered me to this day. (The priest must have been a Jesuit ?). Educated by the Dominicans, it has been ingrained in us that "the means never justify the end".
What has been suppressed by the liberal mainstream media, both print and broadcast, are anecdotal and evidence-based random acts of kindness and of course, the charitable contributions by some very wealthy individuals. Sadly though, inequality between the genders, as it applies to wages for one, still exists in our society. The Pope criticized inequality, but to his credit (keen perception re political implications), fittingly offered no solutions, lest drawing the ire of both politicians and religious alike.

john andrechak | 1/9/2013 - 12:03am

redistribution has occurred, over the past forty years massive wealth has been transfered from the middle class, concentrated in the hands of one to two percent of the nation. Using union busting measures, unmitigated globalization, deregulation, "it is only class war when we fight back" as far as the Church and capitalism, the hierarchy has as a class always sided with wealth and power; "socialism" please, Obama is a center right; the GOP are just crazy and/or shills for the 1%

michael iwanowicz | 1/2/2013 - 11:36pm

This is the uniqueness of the church - directing commentary that prescinds from politics.

michael iwanowicz | 1/2/2013 - 11:33pm

The Pope speaks and writes from a perspective that is a discerning moment in public affairs distinct from an ideological moment ..

deacon mike