The National Catholic Review

While the pontificate of Pope Benedict XVI has certainly enjoyed major successes, like the pope’s visit last fall to England to beatify Cardinal Newman, the crises that have led to empty pews in the Catholic parishes of England, Europe and the United States persist.

The fundamental criticism of the institutional church is that its clerical, all-male establishment has not made room for other voices. There is no need to list the number of recent policy decisions, from Rome to home, which would have been more prudent if only a variety of laypersons had been consulted.

Jesus told his disciples that they were servants, that they were to feed the hungry and share their wealth with the poor and that they should demonstrate their love for one another by offering their lives in service. Some in church leadership have done the opposite, creating a culture of clericalism that too often values loyalty over accountability. In these circumstances, a project of reform is essential to rejuvenate church leadership and give greater voice to the whole church. As Pope John Paul II wrote in “Novo Millennio Ineunte,” quoting St. Paulinus of Nola: “Let us listen to what all the faithful say, because in every one of them the Spirit of God breathes” (No. 45).

How to begin? No one should anticipate changes in the existing discipline on celibacy or in the teaching on women’s ordination, but there are other ways to reform church structures to allow women and married men to participate in church governance. One proposal is simply to change canon law to admit laypeople to the College of Cardinals. The church could thereby continue its all-male priesthood, yet transform the “men’s club” into a church with a face that more resembles the people of God described in the documents of the Second Vatican Council.

A more realistic proposal, however, would entail two steps: First, reorganize diocesan offices so that laypeople constitute at least half of the bishop’s principal advisers. (Increasing numbers of laity have already been hired as staff in many U.S. dioceses.) Second, create a new body, an international council of laypersons to share functions with the College of Cardinals. After attrition among the cardinals, each of the two bodies eventually could have 100 members. The lay members would be Catholics who love the church and are recognized for sound Christian judgment. They would come from a variety of occupations—education, health, religious life, law, the arts, business, science, government and labor. Church leadership would not be limited to elderly men but would be expanded to include men and women, married and unmarried, of different ages. Wisdom, after all, can be found from a multitude of sources, something that St. Benedict acknowledged when he urged an abbot at a monastery to solicit the opinion of even the youngest member of the community: “By the Lord’s inspiration, it is often a younger person who knows what is best.”

Some members of the council would direct Vatican offices; others would come to Rome for regular consultation. Membership could be proportionate to the Catholic populations throughout the world, chosen for a specified term on the recommendation of grass-roots representative caucuses of clergy and laity. The combined college and council would share three functions: administer the Vatican offices, advise the pope and select his successor.

These laypeople would offer much-needed perspective on the impact of the teachings and practices of the church, including such divisive subjects as contraception, the role of women in the church, the treatment of homosexuals and the failure of authorities to respond quickly and forcefully to the scandal of sexual abuse by members of the clergy. They would understand other pastoral failings, like the denial of the Eucharist to public persons because of their political positions, a too modest peace and justice agenda, lackluster liturgies with unprepared sermons and insensitive celebrants.

One may object that this initiative is a “pie in the sky” idea that the clerical establishment would never accept. Perhaps. Yet the implementation of specific alternatives like a lay council need not threaten the current leadership. For the authority of the church “is exercised in the service of truth and charity” (“Ut Unum Sint,” No. 3). Nor would a council undermine the pope’s authority. As Pope John Paul II wrote of the papacy: “The authority proper to this ministry is completely at the service of God’s merciful plan and it must always be seen in this perspective” (No. 92). Discerning that plan is a task that Catholics should take on together.

Following Pope John Paul’s example, we encourage our readers, clergy and lay, to evaluate this proposal and suggest other reforms that would achieve the same goals. The church has survived these 2,000 years because at key moments it chose the path of renewal. It may be that another such moment has arrived.

Show Comments (56)

Comments (hide)

Bob Betterton | 2/11/2011 - 2:49pm
While the suggestion of including laypeople in the hierarchy is certainly innovative and full of theoretical potential, I would not expect it to go anywhere for several reasons:

1)  There is little or no chance that the current hierarchy would allow it.

2)  If the process to implement it follows the same schedule as the silly and insignificant revision of the of the liturgy, most of us will be long dead first.

3)  The people deemed acceptable for the new laypeople council and likely to volunteer for it would no doubt be those who think the status quo is acceptable.

The problems of the Church today are due to the failure of the laypeople to speak out against the tyranny of the hierarchy.

To quote that renowned philosopher, Pogo:  "We has met the enemy and they is us!"

Bob Betterton
The Compliant, Curious and Critical Catholic, xlibris books 2005
Thou Shalt Not Cope, to be released in April 2011 
Basile Pennyworth | 2/11/2011 - 2:38pm
At this moment the throngs in Cairo have prevailed and the president has resigned. It seems that the revolution has succeeded. A quieter, more peaceful revolution - perhaps just as powerful - is taking place in the Church. More and more of the faithful are simply leaving.
Fewer and fewer "enablers" remain, who by their presence and fidelity keep the structures intact. I am one of those enablers. We still contribute. We still pray for vocations, although God may be sending them in abundance where we dare not look. We maintain the status quo.
Perhaps the many who leave are doing God's work by refusing to keep the institution propped up. Someday it will collapse of its own weight, and the phoenix will rise from the ruins. At age 80, I am not likely to see it. But if, more than simply leaving, a more proactive revolution arises, I'm not too old to join!
TOM LENERT | 2/11/2011 - 2:21pm
While I welcome the thought, I fear that as long as we have a celibate hieracrchy in Rome calling all the shots, it will never lead to anything positive.  Unless there were a change of heart among our leaders, I am afraid that the initiative would be nothing more than window dressing.  The beautiful sayings you quote of Pope John Paul II and of Benedict XVI are contradicted by the concrete decisions they have made, such as the appointment of loyalist bishops who subscribe to every word coming from the Vatican, the new liturgical translations, to mention only two.  They still think that they, not the people, have all the answers.  Tom
Clare McGrath-Merkle | 2/11/2011 - 2:19pm
The mushrooming number of online multi-national signatories to the German theologians' over-reaching letter suggests that the historical losses of optional celibacy and female participation in the ministerial priesthood may not be matters the faithful consider to be mere epiphenomena to be left for a distant future's resolution.
At the heart of the abuse crisis is that of an episcopal crisis centering on the abuse of authority, attributable to a catastrophic failure in generativity, an Eriksonian idea suggesting a psychological and moral stunting due, as a large body of research suggests, to a subculture egregiously distorted by the exclusion of women, as wives and as leaders.

Clare McGrath-Merkle OCDS
Generativity and the U.S. Bishops' Responses to the Sexual Abuse of Minors by Priests 
Journal of Religion and Health. March 2010, Volume 49, Number 1, 73-86.
Gabriel Austin | 2/11/2011 - 2:02pm
There is a way for the laity to be heard - and in abundance. It is called PRAYER. You will find a handy guide in the work called SPIRITUAL EXERCISES.
Chris Brune | 2/11/2011 - 1:23pm
I am torn. On the one hand I say let the hierarchy do whatever they want and bear the  consequences.

On the other hand, those consequences might be so debilitating, that one could be accused of failing to serve God through inaction.

Don't look to me for an answer; just more questions.


Recently by The Editors

Fear Not! (December 6, 2016)
The Right to Data (December 6, 2016)
Signs of Change (November 22, 2016)
Spotlight on Refugees (November 22, 2016)
Death Watch (November 15, 2016)

Recently in Editorials