In All Things
Shocking News about the Legionaries

David Gibson has a story that has been percolating on the web for the last few days, about the late founder of the ultraconservative Legionaries of Christ, Father Marcial Maciel Degollado, who had been publicly sanctioned in 2006 by Pope Benedict XVI after an extensive investigation of charges of abuse levied by former members of the LC seminarians, now adults.
Now comes news that Maciel had fathered a child, and that the Legion of Christ is about to "renounce" him as their founder.
Here is Gibson: "The late Father Marcial Maciel Degollado, the venerated and vilified founder of the powerful conservative Catholic order, the Legionaries of Christ, may have been a father in the biological as well. At American Papist, Thomas Peters confirms rumors circulating in recent days of scandalous news coming down the pipe about a prominent Catholic....Now it turns out Maciel may have fathered at least one child, a woman now in her early 20’s, and may have illicitly used funds to support his family and a ’double life.’ That’s on Gibson’s Pontifications blog here.
That portion of the story has been confirmed to me by a former Legionary member, who sadly described those LCs he still was in touch with as "shattered" by the news. The New York Times has the story here, though LC officials are not confirming it. However, as Laurie Goodstein reports, "[T]he order’s general director, the Rev. Álvaro Corcuera, is quietly visiting its religious communities and seminaries in the United States and informing members that their founder led a double life, current and former Legionaries said."
The news is doubly surprising.
For one thing, Father Maciel’s abuse was against young men, and so most probably assumed, when the abuse revelations were made public, that he was homosexual. Most psychiatrists and psychologists, however, say that sexual abuse against minors is not so much an indication of sexual orientation--whether homosexual or heterosexual--as much as it indicates a stunted or malformed sexuality overall. This is not to deny that most of the clergy sexual abuse was against adolescent boys and even men, and perpetrated by gay men, but rather to point out how the question of abuse is more complex than is usually thought, and whose solution is more complex than simply barring gay men from holy orders.
But the bigger surprise, if the reports are correct about the "renouncement" is this: For a religious order to "renounce" its founder is nearly unprecedented. Yet even a downplaying of the founder could be a serious blow to the order. (One of our bloggers commented on this part of the story: see below.)
The "charism," or guiding spirit, of an order comes from its founder. His (or her) writings, letters and spiritual practices are carefully studied and emulated by members of the order; such study makes up a large part of the members’ early training. Jesuits pore over the writings of St. Ignatius of Loyola; Franciscans of St. Francis of Assisi; Dominicans of St. Dominic. The founder or foundress is considered as the spiritual father or mother of the order. (Jesuits, for example, are often called "Sons of Ignatius.") Statues, portraits and holy cards of the founder abound in the communities and works of the order. The influence of the founder or foundress on the life of the religious order he or she founded cannot be overstated. This is one reason why canonization of the founder is so important to religious orders; it is an implicit approval of the order itself: the two are inextricably linked.
A few founders have run into difficulties after their orders were set up (St. Francis of Assisi was nearly kicked out of his own order by Franciscans who found his poverty too extreme), but in those rare cases, the order always welcomes back the founder as an essential--the essential--part of the history and spirituality of the order. As one example, note the photo above, from CNS, is captioned, "Legionaries of Christ take part in a Jan. 31 [2008] memorial service in honor of their founder, Father Marcial Maciel Degollado, at the Irish Institute in San Pedro Garza, a suburb of Monterrey, Mexico." The Legionaries generally refer to Father Maciel as "Nuestro Padre."
It would be as if the Dominicans said, "We’re through with St. Dominic."
James Martin, SJ




Add Comments (registration required)
Comments
Yes, and to add to this, more complex than simply allowing married men into holy orders as others like to suggest. Children and adolescents have been raped by people with same or other sex attraction, single or married, clergy or laity. Until people understand that at the root of this is a perversion that can't be boxed into neat little categories, we're only going to have the same fabricated answers on what to do about pedophilia.
As far as the LC, I'm sure there are some who will suggest there have been Dominicans or Jesuits who have been accused of such wrongs. Indeed there have been, how can one possibly imagine these orders as they are if it was Dominic or Ignatius who were the perpetrators.
Barbara Dorris
Outreach Director
Survivors Network of those Abused by Priests
314-862-7688
SNAPdorris@gmail.com
AMDG,
Actually, I read something fascinating a while ago, based upon the findings of some professionals who had been treating such abusive adults for decades. They found that most of the men who abuse young (pre-pubescent) identify as 'straight.' They are attracted to the soft, 'girlish' figures of the young boys (rather than the musculature that comes with puberty and development). They would also get aroused by women but not men. Thus they seem more like 'sick heterosexuals' than homosexuals. We need to be careful about just assigning all (or most) blame to "gay" priests.
Until the LC is dissolved any well meaning priest cannot continue with the tag of LC after their name. The LC reminder of their founder will always negate their words.
All orders and dioceses have had bad apples and these bad apples have spoiled the bushel, until a strong leader has come along to bring them back to their founders charisms. In this case the founder is the bad apple and all of his writings become suspect. It would be better for B-XVI to find a place for them to reinvent themselves.
In Christ,
Fr. Marty
From what has been disclosed, it appears that Degollado was a sexual neurotic, in serious need of psychotherapy. It is obvious he was not a candidate for celibate life, and probably not for married life either. Sexual perverts, under the guise of religious fervor, are most adept at concealing their proclivities from others and sublimating their prurient interests within themselves. That said, the psychological, emotional, and spiritual devastation visited upon others by such individuals is permanent and without relief.
Many of Degollado’s adherents are going to need some serious counseling.
So even if the allegations are admitted, the Legionaries will probably not be able to talk about or explore what that means for themselves of the Legion: silence as always.
Chances are though, that Corcuera will only mention that there are more allegations (which he will not detail) and that legionaries should be careful reading newspapers or watching the news that there may be articles they should avoid or turn over.
This happened in 1998 when the Hartford Courant first published the allegations against Maciel about sex abuse - the communities (and I was in one) were told that serious allegations had been made in the public media but the details of these were not given to the communities.
We were forbidden to mention the allegations to anyone, we were forbidden to even acknowledge that we were told about them, we were to be vigilant about the media, that some family members may want to talk about it or send us newspaper clips - always we had to change the subject and never enter into debate or conversation about the subject.
We had a three day tridduum (adoration, more silence, special rosaries etc)for Maciel at that point, I think they tried to make it in thanksgiving for him and for his continued strength in moments of trial... Something positive.
If Corcuera acts differently to this - i.e., not simply as a damage limiter - it may indeed be indicative of change.
Just saying.
"This is not to deny that most of the clergy sexual abuse was against adolescent boys and even men, and perpetrated by gay men"
This does not suggest that pedophilia is primarily a problem among gay men. Rather, it states what is well known and true: The scandal of abuse in the Church was perpetrated against adolescent boys (who had reached puberty and therefore sexual maturity, age 13-17) and men. The numbers in this regard are staggering. We did not have a pedophilia problem in the Church we had a homosexual one.
'This is not to deny that most of the clergy sexual abuse was against adolescent boys and even men, and perpetrated by gay men.'
This does not suggest that pedophilia is primarily a problem among gay men. Rather, it states what is well known and true: The scandal of abuse in the Church was perpetrated against adolescent boys (who had reached puberty and therefore sexual maturity, age 13-17) and men. The numbers in this regard are staggering. We did not have a pedophilia problem in the Church we had a homosexual one.
Still, as this seems to be about something OTHER than this, I am confused why anyone would think even the millions of sins of particular individuals would amount to destroying the ideal itself?
What is the percentage of those who are unfaithful to their marriage vows? What is the percentage of those who enter marriage for the power and the "cover" it gives them for their depravity? Yet, no one is suggesting that marriage should be eliminated or that it's "sexual intercourse with one woman for life" that makes one into a pervert.
Add Comments (registration required)
* The opinions expressed here are those of our contributors, and do not necessarily reflect the editorial opinion of America magazine.