The National Catholic Review
Maurice Timothy Reidy
Image

I have spent much of my life in the Catholic world: first grammar school, then high school, followed later by almost 10 years in the Catholic press. It is telling that while studying journalism at Columbia University, I worked at a parochial school in the Bronx. I guess I could only wander so far from the fold.

When my wife and I decided to adopt a child, a Catholic adoption agency seemed the natural choice. We were in search of a community that shared our values to help shepherd us through a difficult process. After some research, however, we found that the agency that best met our needs was not Catholic. A local nonprofit agency offered an impressive array of services and support. Their values were in keeping with our values. In the end, it was not a difficult decision.

Part of me felt guilty for not supporting an important Catholic ministry. I imagine many young parents feel the same way when, for various reasons, they choose to send their child to public school. In my case, my feelings were complicated by the fraught state of the Catholic adoption industry. In Boston and elsewhere, church officials have closed adoption agencies rather than comply with state laws mandating that same-sex couples be allowed to adopt. The future of other Catholic agencies is cloudy.

I began this column thinking I would write about these challenges. Perhaps I would note, with sadness, that another era in Catholic life seems to be coming to an end. Catholic orphanages were once part of a vast network of institutions that sought to serve every Catholic’s need from birth to burial. Perhaps I would explore the reasons for this decline, such as the high rate of abortion and the exponential growth of the fertility industry.

Instead of dwelling on these facts, however, I would like to offer a more hopeful tale. Three years ago, my wife and I applied to be adoptive parents. Nearly a year later, we brought our daughter, Elizabeth, home. Though we did not use a Catholic agency, we were deeply gratified by the process, which we found to be profoundly pro-life.

Ours was a domestic adoption. Early on, we met with a group of other prospective parents to ask questions and discuss our anxieties. Agency representatives explained the process in detail. Over 50 percent of mothers who meet with the agency choose to keep the child. Birth mothers and prospective parents are assigned their own social workers. Newborn babies stay with temporary caregivers for a short time before placement to ensure that the birth mother is confident in her decision.

My wife and I found great comfort in these facts. It was clear that the agency wanted to make sure that a mother’s choice of adoption was the right one for her.

We also found ourselves persuaded by the logic of open adoption, in which adoptive couples are encouraged to maintain an ongoing relationship with birth parents. We agreed to do so because we believe it is in Elizabeth’s best interest. We want her to grow up with a full sense of her own identity.

Open adoption appealed to us for other reasons, too. In a real way, it seeks to make the world more welcoming to children. The sad fact is that some women do not see adoption as a legitimate alternative to abortion. They cannot imagine having a child and then never seeing that child again. Open adoption offers them a life-giving choice.

Our family life is now shaped by this practice. We exchange pictures and e-mail messages with Elizabeth’s birth parents. On a few occasions, we have met. We did not learn these habits from our church, but they feel true to our identity as Catholics. Sometimes you have to venture afield to find your way home.

Maurice Timothy Reidy is online editor of America.

Comments

SUSAN ANDREWS | 11/2/2011 - 1:10pm
Thank you for your thoughts about adoption. Four of our children are adopted-the first came from a private agency before open adoptions were practiced; the next two arrived from Vietnam and there has never been a record of their birth parents. Our last experience was a private and open adoption of our daughter. As a child her development and successes were shared with her birth parents via letters and photos.  As an adult  she has chosen to have a close relationship to them, though we are still Dad and Mom and soon-to-be grandparents of her first child. My feeling about open adoption and birth parents is that none of us can have too many loving, caring people in our lives.
THOMAS FARANDA | 10/7/2011 - 1:36pm
Beautiful column. We have two adopted sons, one arriving through the very fine auspices of the Catholic Home Bureau of the Archdiocese of NY - he's now in college studying electrical engineering - and one through our prolife contacts in NY, who is now playing football at Stepinac HS in White Plains, NY.

We are immensely grateful to all the people who aided us, and of course especially to the birth mothers who made what many would view as a heroic decision to "make a plan" for their baby, that included us.

Recently in Of Many Things