Loading...
Loading...
Click here if you don’t see subscription options
Matt EmersonSeptember 16, 2014

The New York Times on Sunday ran one of the more haunting (and also fascinating) articles I've read in some time about an issue becoming more urgent by the day.

Set against the backdrop of the case of Reggie Shaw, whose texting while driving caused the death of two people, the article gives an overview not only of Shaw's road to redemption but also of the way the science of the brain enters into the discussion. The author of the piece, Matt Richtel, asks:

In addition to an intense human and legal drama, something else came of this landmark case — a scientific journey by the prosecutors, including testimony from a researcher who began to answer a crucial question in the digital age: When Reggie was texting, what was going on inside his brain?
 

What follows is fascinating, informative, and heartbreaking. It's an article well worth a discussion among faculty and students, particularly those who have just received their licenses.   

Comments are automatically closed two weeks after an article's initial publication. See our comments policy for more.

The latest from america

As we grapple with fragmentation, political polarization and rising distrust in institutions, a national embrace of volunteerism could go a long way toward healing what ails us as a society.
Kerry A. RobinsonApril 18, 2024
I forget—did God make death?
Renee EmersonApril 18, 2024
you discovered heaven spread to the edges of a max lucado picture book
Brooke StanishApril 18, 2024
The joys and challenges of a new child stretched me in ways I couldn’t have imagined.
Jessica Mannen KimmetApril 18, 2024