St. Paul and women

As indicated in an earlier blog in THE GOOD WORD, there are a number of passages in the writings of St. Paul which suggest understandings of, and limitations on, women that seem unreasonable.  It is too long a project to analyze here all of these passages - indeed, a fair and final evaluation of them means an attempt at understanding each of Paul’s sayings in its context.  But I offer one thought which means to be a general principle applicable to all Paul wrote, including the material regarding women.  Paul’s writings issue from an inspired, highly intelligent, holy person who is, at the same time, a child of his tradition.  Paul never left behind his adherence to Jewish Law and practices.  If he were aware of conflicts between his way of thinking and that of Jesus, he deferred to Jesus.  But if it was not clear to him what Jesus’ thinking might be in concrete situations and in the analysis of human nature that has come down to him from his Jewish tradition, Paul regularly appeals to his tradition in counselling others.  To put the matter briefly, Paul depended on his Jewish tradition to guide him in regard to women, a tradition which has been constantly shaped anew by reflection over centuries on the words of Christ.  Consider an example: it is clear that Jesus never allowed divorce, yet the Church does.  It is only by the Christian tradition’s thinking about the mind of Jesus that it came to the conclusion that divorce in certain circumstances is permitted, and thus is according to the mind of Christ.  In regard to Paul, he offers some of the most profound insights into the mind of God and Christ, but he is, when left without clear revelation of God’s mind, limited to his Jewish tradition.  Thus, if one is to understand Paul (and correct him), one must understand the Jewish view of women.  This is no excuse, as it were, for Paul’s thinking, nor is it an attempt to analyze all the particular statements of Paul (which often are made in view of certain circumstances not readily known); it is rather a constant call to understand what of Scripture is of Christ and God, and what is to be understood as limitations on human thinking.  Ultimately, it is the Church which decides what is perennial, what is passing in Scripture.
9 years 4 months ago
I understood that some (about 3, I forget) of the letters of Paul were actually written by others--and hence in some cases it wasn't actually Paul's writing. But the church accepts those letters as inspired "Pauline" scripture.

Don't miss the best from America

Sign up for our Newsletter to get the Jesuit perspective on news, faith and culture.

The latest from america

In this photo taken May 19, 2017, a GPO worker stacks copies of "Analytical Perspectives Budget of the U.S. Government Fiscal Year 2018" onto a pallet at the U.S. Government Publishing Office's (GPO) plant in Washington. (AP Photo/Carolyn Kaster)
The budget’s moral measure will be assessed by “how well it promotes the common good of all,” the bishops write.
Kevin ClarkeMay 22, 2017
A veteran activist provides a blueprint for creating a movement in the moment of Trump.
Nathan SchneiderMay 22, 2017
Given the number of those in the California legal system today who are Latino, “you can guess a large percentage of them are Catholic.”
Jim McDermottMay 22, 2017
Pope Francis waves during a visit to give an Easter blessing to homes in a public housing complex in Ostia, a Rome suburb on the Mediterranean Sea, May 19 (CNS photo/L'Osservatore Romano).
Vatican leaders seem quietly confident that the meeting will go well.
Gerard O'ConnellMay 22, 2017