See These Christians, How They 'Fisk' Each Other?

A recent exchange of warm regards between John Gehring at Faith in Public Life and the U.S.C.C.B.’s media office raised some eyebrows. Gehring had penned a June background memo for media aimed at countering some of the inevitably anti-Obama subtext of the U.S.C.C.B.’sFortnight for Freedom (a memo to the press not quite the odd bird depicted by Catholic avengers on the Internet; we get press releases all the time aimed at bending coverage, though I can’t recall having received one from Faith in Public Life before explicitly bannered as “background.”)

The media relations office eventually fired off a response; all well and good, grownups at odds over public policy, having an e-conversation with the good old fourth estate serving as mediator.

The U.S.C.C.B. response took the form of what has become an internet era classic, a fisking, a point-by-point takedown of the opponent’s missive—also not something unheard of. But what “sounded” a tad odd, coming from the bishops and not a wiseacre blogger like me, was the opening salvo that may have had more Glenn Beck than Prince of Peace in it. Mentioning George Soros in any context is red meat for a certain kind of contemporary conservative and his inclusion in the U.S.C.C.B. memo produced the predictable reaction at several Web sites. (Just take a gander at the invective at this site.) 

Now Gehring in turn has fired off a response to the response. We may yet see a response to the response to the response, but I’m not sure, being a member of the easily distracted lamestream media, if I won’t have moved on to the another internecine squabble by then.

The story behind this story was the subject of a recent NPR report, which featured Gehring and some of the media's go-to Catholic talking heads. You can tune in to that here.

Tom Maher
4 years 10 months ago
John Gehring of Faith in Public Life media memo needed to be refuted.  For example one of the points that Gehring's memo makes is  "Most Americans and Catholics support the HHS mandate and reject the Church’s concerns."  This assertion is blatantly false.  How could such public misinformation not be refuted by the Church or anyone in the public for its falseness in fact?  

The Church of cousre should actively paritcipate in public debates on public policy especially when the Church itself is impacted by goverenemnt policies as is the case with the HHS mandate.  Silence is not an option.  The Church views on public policy must be made known.
Jim McCrea
4 years 10 months ago
"The Church views on public policy must be made known."

When views become rather blatant threats of coercion, they they need to be curtailed.

Don't miss the best from America

Sign up for our Newsletter to get the Jesuit perspective on news, faith and culture.

The latest from america

Greg Hicks as "Richard III" (photo: Alex Brenner)
It would be fascinating were the producers able to arrange a quick transfer to a venue somewhere near the White House.
David StewartMay 26, 2017
In the hyper-curated, beautiful world that Dev lives in, a scene that conveys the touching, ugly stubbornness of marriage seems totally impossible.
Eloise BlondiauMay 26, 2017
This image released by the Minya governorate media office shows bodies of victims killed when gunmen stormed a bus in Minya, Egypt, Friday, May 26, 2017 (Minya Governorate Media office via AP).
The attack in central Egypt today killed at least 26 people, including children aged 2 to 4, and wounded 25 others.
Gerard O'ConnellMay 26, 2017
The data and facts are clear: If you care about working families and sound economic policy, SNAP is the program for you.
Meghan J. ClarkMay 26, 2017