In All Things
A Pro-Life DNC Chair!
I never thought I would live to see the day. If anyone had any doubts about Barack Obama’s willingness to listen to pro-life Democrats, his selection of Virginia Governor Tim Kaine to head the Democratic National Committee should settle those doubts. Obama means business.
Governor Kaine is clearly one of the president-elect’s favorite fellow politicians. He was on the short-list for the vice-presidency but his lack of foreign policy credentials was deemed an insurmountable hurdle. But, Kaine is also pro-life. There are those in the GOP who will contest the point. They correctly point out that Kaine said during his campaign that he would enforce the law and the law is Roe v. Wade. Of course, this was a mere statement of fact. The Governor of Virginia, like the Governor of any other state, must abide by the laws of the United States. We fought a great and terrible civil war, much of it on the soil of Virginia, on precisely this point.
But, Kaine said more than that he would enforce the laws. He took the time to explain his opposition to abortion and to capital punishment. In historically Republican and conservative Virginia, Kaine’s opposition to capital punishment was even more of an impediment to his election than his opposition to abortion! He explained why his Catholic views were important to him, and how he saw those views making different claims upon his conscience and upon his veto power. Most importantly, he was not afraid to admit that there is some ambivalence about how religious views intersect with the duties of public office. NARAL refused to endorse his candidacy.
It would be wrong to think that either abortion or capital punishment were the decisive issues in the 2005 Virginia gubernatorial race. Taxes and transportation funding were the main points of contention. But, Kaine’s willingness to talk about his views on traditional moral issues, to say nothing of his biography which includes a year with the Jesuit Volunteer Corps in Honduras, kept him from being tarred as a typical, ACLU-loving liberal. Having dodged the caricature, he got a hearing on the issues over which a governor really has some clout, namely, taxes and transportation. While his fellow Democrats lost all other statewide races, Kaine won a surprisingly easy victory as Governor.
So far, there has been no comment from NARAL or NOW on the selection, which has not been officially announced. It will be curious to see if pro-abortion groups take to the airwaves in protest the way gay rights groups did over the selection of the Reverend Rick Warren to give the invocation at the Inauguration. And, it will be even more curious to see how Team Obama responds. They stuck to their guns on Warren and my fingers are crossed they will do the same on Kaine.
Comments (19) |
2808 Views
Add Comments (registration required)
Comments
Kaine claims a personal, religious opposition to abortion, but nonetheless supports legal abortions. That's not different from Democrats in presidential elections past like Mario Cuomo -- who made famous the "personally opposed but" statement that has rankled pro-life advocates.
Kaine told the Washington Post, during his 2001 campaign for Lt. Governor, that he "opposes efforts to restrict abortions" and that he "opposes efforts to require a parent's consent before a minor gets an abortion."
Then, facing more intense scrutiny in his 2005 gubernatorial bid, Kaine changed positions and said he favors abortion limits.
However, his flip-flop didn't catch leading pro-life advocates off guard.
"When Timothy Kaine was running for Lt. Governor, he supported abortion," former National Right to Life political director Carol Tobias told LifeNews.com in 2005. "Four years later, after seeing pro-abortion Democrats continue to lose election after election, Mr. Kaine now sings a different tune."
Tobias said she didn't believe Kaine's supposed change of position is real.
Recognizing Kaine as the more pro-abortion of the candidates in the race, the director of NARAL's Virginia affiliate said, "Between these two men, we see more hope ... in Kaine's candidacy, and we are eager and willing to work with him on these important issues should he be elected."
From http://www.lifenews.com/nat4700.html
He now says he has a faith-based opposition to abortion. I would rather he have a natural law opposition, since we have plenty of Catholic pols that say they personally believe abortion is wrong yet nonetheless vote for it.
And do you really think he is not going to be promoting pro-abortion Democrats? Well here is hoping that he at least promotes pro-life ones.
You haven't. Hope you're young and in good health.
They cynical among us might also comment that for some people, to be pro-life is to support a revocation of federal supremacy on the abortion issue (which would bleed into all areas of law, including race), treating abortion as a gynocological crime - as it was prior to Roe and/or supporting a Life Amendment - which would ultimately require constitutional Republican majorities in Congress and in 3/4 of the state legislatures. I doubt any Democrat, or even most Republicans, could meet those standards.
The ability for the Governor to call himself pro-life is the movement's own fault, since it is very amorphous on its legislative agenda, speaking only in code about what it wants to do (using words like "Federalism" when there proposal would make Hamilton - the founder of the Federalist movement go into fits). That bit of wiggle room allows Kaine to claim he is pro-life, or Biden Kerry to say they are personally pro-life.
If the pro-life movement does not like this, they need to get very specific about what they stand for.
All should read a recent piece in the Wall Street Journal by Anne Hendershott. It is understandable the Michael Sean Winters and others think one can be Catholic and pro-abortion at the same time. They have been misled by the likes of Rev. Joseph Fuchs, the Rev. Robert Drinan, and the Revs. Giles Milhaven, Richard McCormick and Charles Curran. Jeffery Miller and others who have posted a comment have it right. Timothy Kaine may say he is opposed to abortion, but his actions contradict this. To read the Wall Street Journal article, go to: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123086375678148323.html
Does anyone remember back when the Jesuits SUPPORTED the Church and its teachings?
What determines personhood is the definition of a Person.
From the Merriam-Webster On Line Dictionary:
Person: Human,Individual
It is not pro-abortion to believe that states cannot trumpt federal supremacy on civil rights matters; that absent federal action to change the status of the unborn, it is illicit to regulate abortion as a gynecological procedure; and that possibly as a matter of policy, the criminalization of abortion that would ensue if the legal status of the unborn in the first trimester would change is not advisable due to negative consequences for society and those who wish to use obstetric services. This is called supporting the rule of law.
Until the Right to Life movement comes to grips with the fact that Roe was rightly decided given the circumstances of the time, it will not make progress in passing any kind of legal restriction on abortion. Instead, it will be seen as an arm of the Republican Party, to be ignored by thinking Catholics, who are tired of opportunism in the name of morality.
Please tell me this post was supposed to be satirical.
The thing is, in terms of politics, I don't know of a single thoroughly "pro-life" official. There are always the exceptions. My understanding, and certainly my strongly-held personal view, is that all abortion is murder all the time. Further, that artificial contraception is the doorway to abortion and the culture of death. The political right-wing in the U.S. has managed to grab hold of the "pro-life" medal, and get lots of votes from Catholics and evangelicals on that basis alone. This then gives them power to pursue other, less pro-life programs.
Many Catholics and evangelicals claim that abortion is a non-negotiable. Fine. But what about the exceptions? What about birth control? Haven't they "negotiated" away their absolute belief in abortion as murder by voting for candidates who favor the exceptions?
A person is a Human Individual in every location, which includes inside or outside of their Mother's Womb.
You cannot go back to the days of regulating abortion with fines. The rights of the unborn need to be recognized by competent legal authority (the national government) in order for abortion to be regulated. Barring such legal recognition, the regulation of abortion is unconstitutional.
Look, I am trying to help. Insanity is doing something over and over and expecting a different result. I've decided to stop drinking the Kool-Aid. When the pro-life movement becomes more than an opportunistic Republican recruiting tool (meaning no disrespect for non-GOP pro-lifers, I am attacking the leadership here), I might give it a second look. For now, I have lost my patience with it and the Bishops who support it.
Add Comments (registration required)
* The opinions expressed here are those of our contributors, and do not necessarily reflect the editorial opinion of America magazine.